MT vs CLS

Comparison between ArcelorMittal (MT, Company) and Celestica Inc (CLS, Company).

MT is from the Basic Materials sector, while CLS is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceCLS has outperformed MT, delivering a return of +114.2% compared to +15.2%

MT vs CLS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	MT(COMPANY)	CLS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$48B	$48B
Max Drawdown	96.94%	96.93%
Sharpe Ratio	2.01	2.27
5Y Beta	1.28	2.38
Industry	Steel	Electronic Components
P/E Ratio	16.59	61.25
Forward P/E	15.82	41.15
PEG Ratio	0.11	1.00
Dividend Yield	0.98%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	11.35%	N/A
Debt to Equity	24.79%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-2.69%	1.86%
P/S Ratio	0.77	3.21
P/B Ratio	0.87	22.89

Market Cap

Winner

$48B

CLS

$48B

Max Drawdown

96.94%

Winner

CLS

96.93%

Sharpe Ratio

2.01

Winner

CLS

2.27

5Y Beta

Winner

1.28

CLS

2.38

Industry

Steel

CLS

Electronic Components

P/E Ratio

Winner

16.59

CLS

61.25

Forward P/E

Winner

15.82

CLS

41.15

PEG Ratio

Winner

0.11

CLS

1.00

Dividend Yield

0.98%

CLS

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

11.35%

CLS

N/A

Debt to Equity

24.79%

Winner

CLS

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

-2.69%

Winner

CLS

1.86%

P/S Ratio

Winner

0.77

CLS

3.21

P/B Ratio

Winner

0.87

CLS

22.89

MT vs CLS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	MT	CLS
1 month	+3.33%	+17.10%
3 months	+0.17%	+17.65%
6 months	+59.89%	+16.59%
1 year	+111.92%	+289.86%
5 years(CAGR)	+15.21%	+114.23%
10 years(CAGR)	+16.92%	+43.51%
Max(CAGR)	+5.39%	+10.18%

+3.33%

Winner

CLS

+17.10%

+0.17%

Winner

CLS

+17.65%

Winner

+59.89%

CLS

+16.59%

+111.92%

Winner

CLS

+289.86%

5Y(CAGR)

+15.21%

Winner

CLS

+114.23%

10Y(CAGR)

+16.92%

Winner

CLS

+43.51%

Max(CAGR)

+5.39%

Winner

CLS

+10.18%

MT vs CLS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	MT	CLS
2026	+31.74%	+24.19%
2025	+102.52%	+217.62%
2024	-16.41%	+226.49%
2023	+8.57%	+157.97%
2022	-17.23%	+0.54%
2021	+34.13%	+40.71%
2020	+29.31%	-3.12%
2019	-12.23%	-6.45%
2018	-39.18%	-17.26%
2017	+43.41%	-10.96%
2016	+137.07%	+8.62%
2015	-60.43%	-5.97%
2014	-36.59%	+13.76%
2013	+2.53%	+23.52%
2012	-8.10%	+6.54%
2011	-48.80%	-25.66%
2010	-19.09%	-1.22%
2009	+79.03%	+98.74%
2008	-66.82%	-20.38%
2007	+93.01%	-24.77%
2006	+69.10%	-26.39%
2005	-26.22%	-24.46%
2004	+329.92%	-8.97%
2003	+299.55%	-0.13%
2002	+18.92%	-65.90%
2001	-36.36%	-18.50%
2000	-85.71%	+1.88%
1999	+50.80%	+93.04%

MT vs CLS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MT was -96.35%, occurring on Feb 11, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CLS was -96.93%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 6049 trading sessions.

The current MT drawdown is -63.99%. The current CLS drawdown is -11.05%.

Rank	MT	CLS
#1	-96.35% Jun 5, 2008 - Feb 11, 2016	-96.93% Oct 20, 2000 - Nov 7, 2024
#2	-95.62% Jan 14, 2000 - Aug 2, 2004	-53.96% Feb 5, 2025 - Jun 24, 2025
#3	-46.40% Feb 25, 2005 - May 8, 2006	-36.73% Mar 17, 2000 - Jul 14, 2000
#4	-28.64% May 8, 2006 - Oct 19, 2006	-33.23% Dec 29, 1999 - Mar 17, 2000
#5	-28.56% Oct 29, 2007 - Apr 4, 2008	-29.24% Nov 5, 2025 - Apr 13, 2026
#6	-27.60% Dec 1, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005	-29.13% Jan 22, 2025 - Jan 31, 2025
#7	-22.91% Oct 6, 2004 - Oct 26, 2004	-24.63% Sep 5, 2000 - Oct 20, 2000
#8	-20.72% Jul 12, 2007 - Sep 14, 2007	-15.04% Aug 12, 2025 - Sep 4, 2025
#9	-12.06% Sep 13, 2004 - Oct 4, 2004	-14.37% Apr 27, 2026 - Apr 28, 2026
#10	-10.37% Dec 7, 1999 - Dec 21, 1999	-13.67% Jul 20, 2000 - Aug 17, 2000
#11	-9.62% Aug 10, 2004 - Sep 7, 2004	-12.63% Dec 13, 1999 - Dec 17, 1999
#12	-8.75% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 26, 2007	-9.30% Sep 23, 2025 - Oct 9, 2025
#13	-7.75% Dec 11, 2006 - Jan 23, 2007	-9.06% Nov 21, 2024 - Dec 5, 2024
#14	-6.91% Jun 21, 2007 - Jul 9, 2007	-7.23% Dec 6, 2024 - Dec 13, 2024
#15	-6.66% Oct 26, 2006 - Dec 11, 2006	-7.15% Dec 13, 2024 - Jan 8, 2025