StockComparison Logo
vs

MSGS vs FCFS

Comparison between Madison Square Garden Sports Corp - Class A (MSGS, Company) and FirstCash Holdings Inc (FCFS, Company).

MSGS is from the Communication Services sector, while FCFS is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceFCFS has outperformed MSGS, delivering a return of +23.0% compared to +18.4%

MSGS vs FCFS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
MSGS
$9.34B
FCFS
$9.33B
Max Drawdown
Winner
MSGS
41.57%
FCFS
82.10%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
MSGS
2.45
FCFS
1.77
5Y Beta
MSGS
0.66
Winner
FCFS
0.35
Industry
MSGS
Entertainment
FCFS
Credit Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
MSGS
-268.16
FCFS
28.09
Forward P/E
MSGS
72.46
Winner
FCFS
21.23
PEG Ratio
MSGS
N/A
FCFS
0.61
Dividend Yield
MSGS
N/A
FCFS
0.73%
5Y Dividends CAGR
MSGS
N/A
FCFS
13.16%
5Y EPS CAGR
MSGS
N/A
FCFS
18.87%
Debt to Equity
Winner
MSGS
-87.49%
FCFS
98.09%
Free Cash Flow Yield
MSGS
0.57%
Winner
FCFS
6.57%
P/S Ratio
MSGS
8.62
Winner
FCFS
2.59
P/B Ratio
Winner
MSGS
1.57
FCFS
4.38

MSGS vs FCFS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
MSGS
+14.40%
FCFS
-6.09%
3M
Winner
MSGS
+24.39%
FCFS
+13.79%
6M
Winner
MSGS
+67.29%
FCFS
+35.16%
1Y
Winner
MSGS
+105.86%
FCFS
+68.70%
5Y(CAGR)
MSGS
+18.41%
Winner
FCFS
+22.97%
10Y(CAGR)
MSGS
+16.66%
Winner
FCFS
+18.17%
Max(CAGR)
MSGS
+16.19%
Winner
FCFS
+17.98%

MSGS vs FCFS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearMSGSFCFS
2026+52.08%+39.88%
2025+15.94%+57.22%
2024+24.80%-1.89%
2023+0.31%+24.87%
2022+8.37%+18.97%
2021-3.03%+13.47%
2020+19.29%-12.96%
2019+10.76%+13.51%
2018+27.82%+7.83%
2017+20.73%+44.66%
2016+11.33%+28.45%
2015+1.45%-31.18%
2014N/A-10.08%
2013N/A+23.26%
2012N/A+41.73%
2011N/A+9.42%
2010N/A+36.58%
2009N/A+15.51%
2008N/A+34.60%
2007N/A-41.79%
2006N/A+78.23%
2005N/A+9.62%
2004N/A+53.28%
2003N/A+140.76%
2002N/A+40.82%
2001N/A+210.80%
2000N/A-71.88%
1999N/A-10.81%

MSGS vs FCFS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MSGS was -41.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 449 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FCFS was -82.10%, occurring on Nov 15, 2000. Recovery took 613 trading sessions.

The current FCFS drawdown is -6.09%.

RankMSGSFCFS
#1-41.57%
Jul 6, 2018 - Apr 20, 2020
-82.10%
Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002
#2-33.28%
Mar 1, 2021 - Apr 11, 2023
-71.13%
Dec 28, 2006 - Sep 24, 2010
#3-25.54%
Dec 16, 2024 - Dec 12, 2025
-52.47%
Nov 29, 2013 - Sep 25, 2017
#4-22.82%
Oct 15, 2015 - Jul 22, 2016
-50.15%
Jul 24, 2019 - Apr 27, 2023
#5-22.36%
Apr 20, 2020 - Dec 28, 2020
-38.17%
Dec 23, 2004 - Nov 3, 2005
#6-22.36%
Jul 31, 2023 - Oct 3, 2024
-34.05%
Jun 3, 2002 - Dec 17, 2002
#7-15.83%
May 4, 2023 - Jul 28, 2023
-34.00%
Sep 19, 2011 - Jan 17, 2013
#8-14.19%
Aug 18, 2016 - Mar 3, 2017
-31.86%
Apr 8, 2004 - Nov 10, 2004
#9-13.16%
Jan 6, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021
-27.76%
Jun 6, 2018 - Apr 25, 2019
#10-10.08%
Feb 18, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
-24.68%
Apr 18, 2006 - Oct 16, 2006
#11-9.49%
Nov 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2018
-23.38%
Apr 23, 2024 - Apr 24, 2025
#12-7.36%
Sep 6, 2017 - Nov 3, 2017
-22.18%
Dec 17, 2002 - Apr 17, 2003
#13-6.56%
Apr 6, 2017 - Jul 19, 2017
-16.67%
Sep 24, 2003 - Oct 22, 2003
#14-5.72%
Jun 20, 2018 - Jun 28, 2018
-16.18%
Mar 28, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013
#15-5.51%
Jan 16, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026
-15.30%
May 5, 2023 - Oct 17, 2023

Correlation

Correlation between MSGS and FCFS is 0.92 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.92
-101

Dividend Comparison (2016 - 2026)

MSGS vs FCFS dividend yield comparison.

YearMSGSFCFS
20260.00%0.38%
20250.00%1.00%
20240.00%1.41%
20230.00%1.25%
20223.82%1.45%
20210.00%1.56%
202036.97%1.54%
20190.00%1.27%
20180.00%1.26%
20170.00%1.14%
20160.00%1.20%

Select Stocks to Compare