StockComparison Logo
vs

MSGS vs EMN

Comparison between Madison Square Garden Sports Corp - Class A (MSGS, Company) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company).

MSGS is from the Communication Services sector, while EMN is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceMSGS has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of +14.7% compared to -7.8%

MSGS vs EMN - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
MSGS
$8.41B
Winner
EMN
$8.43B
Max Drawdown
Winner
MSGS
41.57%
EMN
76.78%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
MSGS
1.97
EMN
-0.11
5Y Beta
Winner
MSGS
0.68
EMN
1.07
Industry
MSGS
Entertainment
EMN
Specialty Chemicals
P/E Ratio
Winner
MSGS
-241.67
EMN
17.80
Forward P/E
MSGS
72.46
Winner
EMN
11.43
PEG Ratio
MSGS
N/A
EMN
0.63
Dividend Yield
MSGS
N/A
EMN
4.50%
5Y Dividends CAGR
MSGS
N/A
EMN
4.41%
5Y EPS CAGR
MSGS
N/A
EMN
-13.84%
Debt to Equity
Winner
MSGS
-87.49%
EMN
86.87%
Free Cash Flow Yield
MSGS
0.63%
Winner
EMN
5.91%
P/S Ratio
MSGS
7.77
Winner
EMN
0.98
P/B Ratio
MSGS
1.57
Winner
EMN
1.40

MSGS vs EMN - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
MSGS
+5.00%
EMN
-1.64%
3M
Winner
MSGS
+20.61%
EMN
-9.56%
6M
Winner
MSGS
+62.79%
EMN
+21.79%
1Y
Winner
MSGS
+78.66%
EMN
-7.54%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
MSGS
+14.70%
EMN
-7.84%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
MSGS
+15.92%
EMN
+3.01%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
MSGS
+15.08%
EMN
+8.62%

MSGS vs EMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearMSGSEMN
2026+35.80%+12.57%
2025+15.94%-24.53%
2024+24.80%+5.62%
2023+0.31%+13.61%
2022+8.37%-29.62%
2021-3.03%+25.71%
2020+19.29%+32.48%
2019+10.76%+12.06%
2018+27.82%-20.50%
2017+20.73%+25.08%
2016+11.33%+15.91%
2015+1.45%-9.67%
2014N/A-3.84%
2013N/A+17.63%
2012N/A+72.68%
2011N/A-6.26%
2010N/A+39.87%
2009N/A+90.79%
2008N/A-45.80%
2007N/A+4.61%
2006N/A+17.28%
2005N/A-6.99%
2004N/A+51.49%
2003N/A+10.46%
2002N/A-1.78%
2001N/A-14.35%
2000N/A+9.36%
1999N/A+27.57%

MSGS vs EMN Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MSGS was -41.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 449 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.

The current EMN drawdown is -34.09%.

RankMSGSEMN
#1-41.57%
Jul 6, 2018 - Apr 20, 2020
-76.10%
May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010
#2-33.28%
Mar 1, 2021 - Apr 11, 2023
-62.79%
Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020
#3-25.54%
Dec 16, 2024 - Dec 12, 2025
-49.36%
Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025
#4-22.82%
Oct 15, 2015 - Jul 22, 2016
-44.78%
May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004
#5-22.36%
Apr 20, 2020 - Dec 28, 2020
-37.68%
May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012
#6-22.36%
Jul 31, 2023 - Oct 3, 2024
-32.81%
Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017
#7-15.83%
May 4, 2023 - Jul 28, 2023
-32.78%
May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001
#8-14.19%
Aug 18, 2016 - Mar 3, 2017
-32.38%
Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000
#9-13.16%
Jan 6, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021
-25.48%
Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006
#10-10.08%
Feb 18, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
-22.79%
Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022
#11-9.49%
Nov 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2018
-20.90%
Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012
#12-7.36%
Sep 6, 2017 - Nov 3, 2017
-17.42%
Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008
#13-6.56%
Apr 6, 2017 - Jul 19, 2017
-13.98%
Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013
#14-5.72%
Jun 20, 2018 - Jun 28, 2018
-11.60%
Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014
#15-5.51%
Jan 16, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026
-11.57%
Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005

Correlation

Correlation between MSGS and EMN is 0.49 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.49
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

MSGS vs EMN dividend yield comparison.

YearMSGSEMN
20260.00%1.17%
20250.00%5.22%
20240.00%3.57%
20230.00%3.54%
20223.82%3.77%
20210.00%2.34%
202036.97%2.66%
20190.00%3.18%
20180.00%3.15%
20170.00%2.26%
20160.00%2.51%
20150.00%2.46%
20140.00%1.91%
20130.00%1.55%
20120.00%1.59%
20110.00%2.53%
20100.00%2.13%
20090.00%2.92%
20080.00%5.55%
20070.00%2.88%
20060.00%2.98%
20050.00%3.41%
20040.00%3.05%
20030.00%4.45%
20020.00%4.79%
20010.00%4.51%
20000.00%3.61%
19990.00%0.92%

Select Stocks to Compare