MSGS vs EMN
Comparison between Madison Square Garden Sports Corp - Class A (MSGS, Company) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company).
MSGS is from the Communication Services sector, while EMN is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceMSGS has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of +14.7% compared to -7.8%
MSGS vs EMN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MSGS vs EMN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MSGS vs EMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MSGS | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +35.80% | +12.57% |
| 2025 | +15.94% | -24.53% |
| 2024 | +24.80% | +5.62% |
| 2023 | +0.31% | +13.61% |
| 2022 | +8.37% | -29.62% |
| 2021 | -3.03% | +25.71% |
| 2020 | +19.29% | +32.48% |
| 2019 | +10.76% | +12.06% |
| 2018 | +27.82% | -20.50% |
| 2017 | +20.73% | +25.08% |
| 2016 | +11.33% | +15.91% |
| 2015 | +1.45% | -9.67% |
| 2014 | N/A | -3.84% |
| 2013 | N/A | +17.63% |
| 2012 | N/A | +72.68% |
| 2011 | N/A | -6.26% |
| 2010 | N/A | +39.87% |
| 2009 | N/A | +90.79% |
| 2008 | N/A | -45.80% |
| 2007 | N/A | +4.61% |
| 2006 | N/A | +17.28% |
| 2005 | N/A | -6.99% |
| 2004 | N/A | +51.49% |
| 2003 | N/A | +10.46% |
| 2002 | N/A | -1.78% |
| 2001 | N/A | -14.35% |
| 2000 | N/A | +9.36% |
| 1999 | N/A | +27.57% |
MSGS vs EMN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MSGS was -41.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 449 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.
The current EMN drawdown is -34.09%.
| Rank | MSGS | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -41.57% Jul 6, 2018 - Apr 20, 2020 | -76.10% May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010 |
| #2 | -33.28% Mar 1, 2021 - Apr 11, 2023 | -62.79% Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 |
| #3 | -25.54% Dec 16, 2024 - Dec 12, 2025 | -49.36% Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #4 | -22.82% Oct 15, 2015 - Jul 22, 2016 | -44.78% May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004 |
| #5 | -22.36% Apr 20, 2020 - Dec 28, 2020 | -37.68% May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012 |
| #6 | -22.36% Jul 31, 2023 - Oct 3, 2024 | -32.81% Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017 |
| #7 | -15.83% May 4, 2023 - Jul 28, 2023 | -32.78% May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001 |
| #8 | -14.19% Aug 18, 2016 - Mar 3, 2017 | -32.38% Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000 |
| #9 | -13.16% Jan 6, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021 | -25.48% Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006 |
| #10 | -10.08% Feb 18, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026 | -22.79% Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022 |
| #11 | -9.49% Nov 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2018 | -20.90% Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 |
| #12 | -7.36% Sep 6, 2017 - Nov 3, 2017 | -17.42% Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 |
| #13 | -6.56% Apr 6, 2017 - Jul 19, 2017 | -13.98% Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013 |
| #14 | -5.72% Jun 20, 2018 - Jun 28, 2018 | -11.60% Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 |
| #15 | -5.51% Jan 16, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026 | -11.57% Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between MSGS and EMN is 0.49 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MSGS vs EMN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MSGS | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 5.22% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 3.57% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 3.54% |
| 2022 | 3.82% | 3.77% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.34% |
| 2020 | 36.97% | 2.66% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 3.18% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 3.15% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 2.26% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.46% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.91% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.55% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 2.53% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 2.13% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.92% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 5.55% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.88% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.98% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.41% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.05% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 4.45% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 4.79% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 4.51% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 3.61% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.92% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks