MSGS vs CIG-C

Comparison between Madison Square Garden Sports Corp - Class A (MSGS, Company) and Cia Energetica DE Minas Gerais - Cemig (CIG-C, Company).

MSGS is from the Communication Services sector, while CIG-C is from the Utilities sector.

5-Year PerformanceMSGS has outperformed CIG-C, delivering a return of +18.4% compared to +12.4%

MSGS vs CIG-C - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	MSGS(COMPANY)	CIG-C(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$8.85B	$8.84B
Max Drawdown	41.57%	84.66%
Sharpe Ratio	2.21	0.76
5Y Beta	0.66	0.32
Industry	Entertainment	Utilities - Regulated Electric
P/E Ratio	-254.05	9.73
Forward P/E	72.46	13.46
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.33
Dividend Yield	N/A	40.80%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	14.18%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	3.49%
Debt to Equity	-87.49%	69.27%
Free Cash Flow Yield	0.60%	6.77%
P/S Ratio	8.17	0.20
P/B Ratio	1.57	1.60

Market Cap

Winner

MSGS

$8.85B

CIG-C

$8.84B

Max Drawdown

Winner

MSGS

41.57%

CIG-C

84.66%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

MSGS

2.21

CIG-C

0.76

5Y Beta

MSGS

0.66

Winner

CIG-C

0.32

Industry

MSGS

Entertainment

CIG-C

Utilities - Regulated Electric

P/E Ratio

Winner

MSGS

-254.05

CIG-C

9.73

Forward P/E

MSGS

72.46

Winner

CIG-C

13.46

PEG Ratio

MSGS

N/A

CIG-C

0.33

Dividend Yield

MSGS

N/A

CIG-C

40.80%

5Y Dividends CAGR

MSGS

N/A

CIG-C

14.18%

5Y EPS CAGR

MSGS

N/A

CIG-C

3.49%

Debt to Equity

Winner

MSGS

-87.49%

CIG-C

69.27%

Free Cash Flow Yield

MSGS

0.60%

Winner

CIG-C

6.77%

P/S Ratio

MSGS

8.17

Winner

CIG-C

0.20

P/B Ratio

Winner

MSGS

1.57

CIG-C

1.60

MSGS vs CIG-C - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	MSGS	CIG-C
1 month	+7.27%	-4.79%
3 months	+24.78%	+3.49%
6 months	+51.09%	+22.63%
1 year	+90.10%	+25.91%
5 years(CAGR)	+18.44%	+12.35%
10 years(CAGR)	+16.83%	+13.99%
Max(CAGR)	+16.10%	+0.38%

Winner

MSGS

+7.27%

CIG-C

-4.79%

Winner

MSGS

+24.78%

CIG-C

+3.49%

Winner

MSGS

+51.09%

CIG-C

+22.63%

Winner

MSGS

+90.10%

CIG-C

+25.91%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

MSGS

+18.44%

CIG-C

+12.35%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

MSGS

+16.83%

CIG-C

+13.99%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

MSGS

+16.10%

CIG-C

+0.38%

MSGS vs CIG-C - Annual Returns (2014 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	MSGS	CIG-C
2026	+51.81%	+20.35%
2025	+15.94%	+23.67%
2024	+24.80%	+3.47%
2023	+0.31%	+8.62%
2022	+8.37%	-1.59%
2021	-3.03%	+19.91%
2020	+19.29%	-12.47%
2019	+10.76%	+2.19%
2018	+27.82%	+113.35%
2017	+20.73%	-24.76%
2016	+11.33%	+71.78%
2015	+1.45%	-66.34%
2014	N/A	-19.31%

MSGS vs CIG-C Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MSGS was -41.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 449 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CIG-C was -84.44%, occurring on Jan 21, 2016. Recovery took 2883 trading sessions.

The current MSGS drawdown is -0.18%. The current CIG-C drawdown is -21.14%.

Rank	MSGS	CIG-C
#1	-41.57% Jul 6, 2018 - Apr 20, 2020	-84.44% Oct 8, 2014 - Mar 27, 2026
#2	-33.28% Mar 1, 2021 - Apr 11, 2023	-24.94% Apr 14, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026
#3	-25.54% Dec 16, 2024 - Dec 12, 2025	-10.86% Sep 22, 2014 - Oct 7, 2014
#4	-22.82% Oct 15, 2015 - Jul 22, 2016	-1.04% Mar 27, 2026 - Mar 31, 2026
#5	-22.36% Apr 20, 2020 - Dec 28, 2020	-0.91% Mar 31, 2026 - Apr 2, 2026
#6	-22.36% Jul 31, 2023 - Oct 3, 2024	-0.60% Apr 6, 2026 - Apr 8, 2026
#7	-15.83% May 4, 2023 - Jul 28, 2023	N/A
#8	-14.19% Aug 18, 2016 - Mar 3, 2017	N/A
#9	-13.16% Jan 6, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021	N/A
#10	-10.08% Feb 18, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026	N/A
#11	-9.49% Nov 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2018	N/A
#12	-8.10% Jun 11, 2026 - Jun 17, 2026	N/A
#13	-7.36% Sep 6, 2017 - Nov 3, 2017	N/A
#14	-6.56% Apr 6, 2017 - Jul 19, 2017	N/A
#15	-5.72% Jun 20, 2018 - Jun 28, 2018	N/A

Correlation

Correlation between MSGS and CIG-C is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.78

-101

Dividend Comparison (2016 - 2026)

MSGS vs CIG-C dividend yield comparison.

Year	MSGS	CIG-C
2026	0.00%	4.40%
2025	0.00%	9.26%
2024	0.00%	7.82%
2023	0.00%	3.72%
2022	3.82%	7.83%
2021	0.00%	6.79%
2020	36.97%	3.37%
2019	0.00%	2.87%
2018	0.00%	0.23%
2017	0.00%	1.41%
2016	0.00%	6.86%