MSFU vs FCG
Comparison between DIREXION DAILY MSFT BULL 2X SHARES (MSFU, ETF) and FIRST TRUST NATURAL GAS ETF (FCG, ETF).
MSFU vs FCG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MSFU vs FCG - Holdings Comparison
MSFU and FCG have 0 common holdings. Overlap is 0.00%
MSFU's top 25 holdings weight is 13.40%. FCG's top 25 holdings weight is 87.53%.
| Rank | MSFU | FCG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | MICROSOFT CORP (MSFT) - 13.40% | DEVON ENERGY CORP (DVN) - 7.85% |
| #2 | N/A | EOG RESOURCES INC (EOG) - 4.75% |
| #3 | N/A | WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP (WES) - 4.72% |
| #4 | N/A | DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) - 4.52% |
| #5 | N/A | OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORP (OXY) - 4.49% |
| #6 | N/A | CONOCOPHILLIPS (COP) - 4.44% |
| #7 | N/A | HESS MIDSTREAM LP CLASS A (HESM) - 4.42% |
| #8 | N/A | APA CORP (APA) - 3.95% |
| #9 | N/A | EQT CORP (EQT) - 3.90% |
| #10 | N/A | PERMIAN RESOURCES CORP CLASS A (PR) - 3.82% |
| #11 | N/A | OVINTIV INC (OVV) - 3.70% |
| #12 | N/A | SM ENERGY CO (SM) - 3.58% |
| #13 | N/A | ANTERO RESOURCES CORP (AR) - 3.34% |
| #14 | N/A | EXPAND ENERGY CORP ORDINARY SHARES NEW (EXE) - 3.32% |
| #15 | N/A | CHORD ENERGY CORP ORDINARY SHARES NEW (CHRD) - 3.02% |
| #16 | N/A | WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD ADR (WDS) - 3.02% |
| #17 | N/A | RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC) - 2.99% |
| #18 | N/A | MATADOR RESOURCES CO (MTDR) - 2.85% |
| #19 | N/A | BAYTEX ENERGY CORP (BTE) - 2.72% |
| #20 | N/A | MURPHY OIL CORP (MUR) - 2.48% |
| #21 | N/A | CNX RESOURCES CORP (CNX) - 2.46% |
| #22 | N/A | NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO (NFG) - 2.18% |
| #23 | N/A | MAGNOLIA OIL & GAS CORP CLASS A (MGY) - 1.80% |
| #24 | N/A | CRESCENT ENERGY CO CLASS A (CRGY) - 1.64% |
| #25 | N/A | GULFPORT ENERGY CORP ORDINARY SHARES (NEW) (GPOR) - 1.57% |
| Total Holdings | 1 | 42 |
MSFU vs FCG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MSFU vs FCG - Annual Returns (2007 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MSFU | FCG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -28.30% | +21.06% |
| 2025 | +15.26% | -4.15% |
| 2024 | +8.05% | +3.63% |
| 2023 | +83.14% | +8.47% |
| 2022 | -13.28% | +41.72% |
| 2021 | N/A | +95.33% |
| 2020 | N/A | -22.08% |
| 2019 | N/A | -18.11% |
| 2018 | N/A | -36.53% |
| 2017 | N/A | -11.75% |
| 2016 | N/A | +18.51% |
| 2015 | N/A | -59.21% |
| 2014 | N/A | -41.30% |
| 2013 | N/A | +23.13% |
| 2012 | N/A | -16.27% |
| 2011 | N/A | -7.96% |
| 2010 | N/A | +6.63% |
| 2009 | N/A | +40.87% |
| 2008 | N/A | -47.62% |
| 2007 | N/A | +12.78% |
MSFU vs FCG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MSFU was -59.69%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for FCG was -97.20%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current MSFU drawdown is -46.79%. The current FCG drawdown is -75.14%.
| Rank | MSFU | FCG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -59.69% Aug 4, 2025 - Mar 27, 2026 | -97.20% Jun 18, 2008 - Mar 23, 2020 |
| #2 | -48.11% Jul 5, 2024 - Jul 15, 2025 | -16.09% Jun 15, 2007 - Oct 12, 2007 |
| #3 | -29.17% Sep 12, 2022 - Mar 16, 2023 | -11.85% Jan 14, 2008 - Feb 20, 2008 |
| #4 | -20.16% Jul 18, 2023 - Nov 10, 2023 | -11.29% Nov 6, 2007 - Jan 3, 2008 |
| #5 | -18.48% Mar 21, 2024 - Jun 12, 2024 | -11.01% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 |
| #6 | -8.42% Jun 15, 2023 - Jul 18, 2023 | -5.88% May 20, 2008 - Jun 9, 2008 |
| #7 | -8.28% Apr 6, 2023 - Apr 26, 2023 | -5.70% Apr 21, 2008 - May 6, 2008 |
| #8 | -6.86% Nov 28, 2023 - Jan 12, 2024 | -4.23% Oct 18, 2007 - Oct 26, 2007 |
| #9 | -6.65% Feb 9, 2024 - Mar 14, 2024 | -4.03% Jun 4, 2007 - Jun 15, 2007 |
| #10 | -5.60% Jun 5, 2023 - Jun 14, 2023 | -3.27% Jan 3, 2008 - Jan 14, 2008 |
| #11 | -4.61% Jan 29, 2024 - Feb 2, 2024 | -2.43% Jun 9, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008 |
| #12 | -3.72% Mar 17, 2023 - Mar 24, 2023 | -2.25% Feb 20, 2008 - Feb 25, 2008 |
| #13 | -3.48% Jul 31, 2025 - Aug 4, 2025 | -2.23% May 22, 2007 - May 30, 2007 |
| #14 | -3.42% May 22, 2023 - May 25, 2023 | -1.59% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2007 |
| #15 | -3.21% Mar 14, 2024 - Mar 21, 2024 | -1.38% Oct 29, 2007 - Oct 31, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between MSFU and FCG is -0.05 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2007 - 2026)
MSFU vs FCG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MSFU | FCG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.46% | 0.51% |
| 2025 | 8.15% | 2.86% |
| 2024 | 7.00% | 2.76% |
| 2023 | 2.11% | 3.25% |
| 2022 | 0.54% | 3.04% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.73% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 3.82% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.87% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.46% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 1.56% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 1.70% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 4.79% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.33% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 0.34% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.40% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 1.23% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.10% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks