MPA vs COMB
Comparison between BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA, ETF) and GRANITESHARES BLOOMBERG COMMODITY BROAD STRATEGY NO K-1 ETF (COMB, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceCOMB has outperformed MPA, delivering a return of +10.3% compared to -1.4%
MPA vs COMB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MPA vs COMB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MPA vs COMB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MPA | COMB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.97% | +20.77% |
| 2025 | +0.55% | +14.51% |
| 2024 | +6.14% | +5.89% |
| 2023 | +8.38% | -6.04% |
| 2022 | -30.62% | +14.58% |
| 2021 | +18.49% | +26.25% |
| 2020 | +8.74% | -2.87% |
| 2019 | +16.73% | +6.97% |
| 2018 | -8.13% | -11.88% |
| 2017 | +5.79% | +4.97% |
| 2016 | +1.69% | N/A |
| 2015 | +7.67% | N/A |
| 2014 | +19.02% | N/A |
| 2013 | -17.83% | N/A |
| 2012 | +9.22% | N/A |
| 2011 | +24.24% | N/A |
| 2010 | +7.57% | N/A |
| 2009 | +43.74% | N/A |
| 2008 | -28.52% | N/A |
| 2007 | -2.68% | N/A |
| 2006 | -0.10% | N/A |
| 2005 | +3.08% | N/A |
| 2004 | +10.03% | N/A |
| 2003 | +11.46% | N/A |
| 2002 | +10.51% | N/A |
| 2001 | +18.13% | N/A |
| 2000 | +10.32% | N/A |
| 1999 | -4.57% | N/A |
MPA vs COMB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MPA was -44.76%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 587 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for COMB was -33.50%, occurring on Apr 21, 2020. Recovery took 735 trading sessions.
The current MPA drawdown is -17.05%. The current COMB drawdown is -8.74%.
| Rank | MPA | COMB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -44.76% May 8, 2007 - Sep 3, 2009 | -33.50% May 23, 2018 - Apr 26, 2021 |
| #2 | -38.09% Dec 14, 2021 - Oct 27, 2022 | -26.48% Jun 7, 2022 - Jan 22, 2026 |
| #3 | -25.90% Feb 24, 2020 - Nov 24, 2020 | -10.79% Mar 8, 2022 - Apr 18, 2022 |
| #4 | -24.32% Jan 7, 2013 - Jan 12, 2015 | -10.77% Oct 25, 2021 - Jan 26, 2022 |
| #5 | -17.24% Aug 19, 2010 - Sep 12, 2011 | -8.74% May 12, 2026 - Jun 9, 2026 |
| #6 | -17.14% Sep 8, 2016 - Aug 7, 2019 | -8.24% Apr 18, 2022 - Jun 6, 2022 |
| #7 | -16.26% Mar 25, 2004 - Oct 18, 2004 | -7.69% Jan 29, 2026 - Mar 4, 2026 |
| #8 | -11.62% Jun 12, 2003 - Jan 5, 2004 | -6.50% Jul 29, 2021 - Sep 13, 2021 |
| #9 | -10.87% Mar 8, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012 | -5.81% Jan 26, 2018 - May 21, 2018 |
| #10 | -10.66% Nov 2, 1999 - Feb 4, 2000 | -5.75% May 24, 2017 - Jul 28, 2017 |
| #11 | -10.48% Feb 4, 2000 - Jul 7, 2000 | -5.49% Jun 10, 2021 - Jul 2, 2021 |
| #12 | -10.40% Oct 7, 2002 - May 6, 2003 | -5.26% Nov 6, 2017 - Jan 2, 2018 |
| #13 | -9.99% Aug 12, 2005 - Mar 8, 2007 | -5.06% Mar 18, 2026 - Mar 31, 2026 |
| #14 | -9.97% Mar 3, 2015 - Dec 22, 2015 | -4.38% Apr 6, 2026 - Apr 28, 2026 |
| #15 | -9.70% Feb 8, 2005 - Jun 7, 2005 | -3.76% May 11, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between MPA and COMB is 0.30 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
MPA vs COMB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MPA | COMB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.11% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 6.98% | 9.05% |
| 2024 | 6.02% | 2.48% |
| 2023 | 3.63% | 6.57% |
| 2022 | 5.60% | 30.85% |
| 2021 | 3.94% | 15.83% |
| 2020 | 4.12% | 0.07% |
| 2019 | 4.16% | 1.48% |
| 2018 | 5.40% | 0.97% |
| 2017 | 5.22% | 0.20% |
| 2016 | 5.56% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 5.94% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 6.19% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 6.93% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 5.51% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 5.81% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 6.45% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 5.43% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 6.98% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 5.00% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.11% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.06% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.22% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.36% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 6.58% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.00% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 2.58% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks