StockComparison Logo
vs

MOO vs HTD

Comparison between VANECK AGRIBUSINESS ETF (MOO, ETF) and John Hancock Tax- Advantaged Dividend Income (HTD, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceHTD has outperformed MOO, delivering a return of +8.0% compared to -0.5%

MOO vs HTD - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
MOO
$940M
Winner
HTD
$944M
Expense Ratio
MOO
0.56%
HTD
N/A
Max Drawdown
Winner
MOO
69.53%
HTD
75.51%
Sharpe Ratio
MOO
0.18
Winner
HTD
1.27
5Y Beta
MOO
0.52
Winner
HTD
0.40
P/E Ratio
MOO
23.90
HTD
N/A
Forward P/E
MOO
14.76
HTD
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
MOO
18.30%
HTD
3.94%
Debt to Equity
MOO
56.96%
HTD
N/A

MOO vs HTD - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
MOO
-5.70%
Winner
HTD
+1.26%
3M
MOO
-7.74%
Winner
HTD
+0.98%
6M
MOO
+6.74%
Winner
HTD
+10.35%
1Y
MOO
+6.05%
Winner
HTD
+20.44%
5Y(CAGR)
MOO
-0.48%
Winner
HTD
+8.04%
10Y(CAGR)
MOO
+6.81%
Winner
HTD
+8.51%
Max(CAGR)
MOO
+5.21%
Winner
HTD
+9.52%

MOO vs HTD - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearMOOHTD
2026+4.45%+9.38%
2025+15.58%+14.53%
2024-12.50%+24.58%
2023-7.83%-10.96%
2022-7.72%-5.72%
2021+24.09%+33.51%
2020+14.10%-16.36%
2019+22.54%+40.16%
2018-6.98%-5.89%
2017+21.38%+12.78%
2016+14.26%+21.54%
2015-8.82%+0.25%
2014+0.86%+32.13%
2013+2.62%+5.76%
2012+10.70%+10.05%
2011-11.98%+23.72%
2010+20.29%+23.14%
2009+50.15%+37.35%
2008-50.62%-35.41%
2007+39.44%-2.38%
2006N/A+29.67%
2005N/A+0.65%
2004N/A-5.40%

MOO vs HTD Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MOO was -69.53%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2291 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HTD was -69.69%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 826 trading sessions.

The current MOO drawdown is -20.76%. The current HTD drawdown is -2.60%.

RankMOOHTD
#1-69.53%
Jun 17, 2008 - Jul 24, 2017
-69.69%
May 9, 2007 - Aug 18, 2010
#2-39.51%
Apr 20, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025
-56.55%
Feb 18, 2020 - Jun 9, 2021
#3-36.75%
Jan 13, 2020 - Sep 2, 2020
-31.59%
Aug 18, 2022 - Sep 4, 2024
#4-17.82%
Jan 14, 2008 - Apr 15, 2008
-20.83%
Mar 10, 2004 - Jul 1, 2005
#5-16.95%
Oct 3, 2018 - Jun 19, 2019
-19.60%
Apr 20, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
#6-11.26%
Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 5, 2007
-18.37%
May 21, 2013 - Apr 16, 2014
#7-9.92%
Apr 21, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008
-16.47%
Dec 18, 2017 - Jan 31, 2019
#8-9.28%
Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 20, 2018
-16.45%
Jul 7, 2011 - Aug 29, 2011
#9-7.05%
Nov 5, 2021 - Jan 12, 2022
-15.34%
Sep 7, 2016 - Jan 10, 2017
#10-6.41%
May 7, 2021 - Oct 19, 2021
-13.91%
Jan 22, 2015 - Feb 25, 2016
#11-6.07%
Jul 23, 2019 - Nov 4, 2019
-13.27%
Apr 2, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025
#12-5.70%
Dec 10, 2007 - Dec 21, 2007
-12.48%
Oct 8, 2012 - Feb 7, 2013
#13-5.54%
Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
-12.37%
Aug 4, 2005 - Jul 19, 2006
#14-5.48%
Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021
-10.99%
Aug 11, 2021 - Dec 27, 2021
#15-5.31%
Jan 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2022
-10.72%
Jan 14, 2022 - Apr 1, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between MOO and HTD is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.89
-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

MOO vs HTD dividend yield comparison.

YearMOOHTD
20260.00%3.78%
20252.47%7.51%
20243.41%7.52%
20232.93%8.73%
20222.15%7.36%
20211.17%5.80%
20201.10%7.97%
20191.26%6.06%
20181.69%10.09%
20171.44%8.85%
20162.14%7.30%
20152.89%7.06%
20143.21%6.27%
20131.91%7.16%
20121.84%6.55%
20110.64%6.56%
20100.61%7.32%
20090.96%10.13%
20081.01%15.29%
20070.00%10.49%
20060.00%8.33%
20050.00%8.03%
20040.00%4.84%

Select Stocks to Compare