MMS vs CWT
Comparison between Maximus Inc (MMS, Company) and California Water Service Group (CWT, Company).
MMS is from the Industrials sector, while CWT is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceCWT has outperformed MMS, delivering a return of -1.3% compared to -6.9%
MMS vs CWT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MMS vs CWT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MMS vs CWT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MMS | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -32.94% | +20.52% |
| 2025 | +15.66% | -0.56% |
| 2024 | -9.23% | -10.67% |
| 2023 | +15.04% | -14.49% |
| 2022 | -7.38% | -14.14% |
| 2021 | +10.48% | +36.49% |
| 2020 | -0.95% | +8.60% |
| 2019 | +16.05% | +13.02% |
| 2018 | -8.24% | +8.62% |
| 2017 | +29.44% | +36.99% |
| 2016 | +2.89% | +50.02% |
| 2015 | +4.97% | -2.76% |
| 2014 | +29.01% | +13.13% |
| 2013 | +36.58% | +27.66% |
| 2012 | +52.34% | +4.24% |
| 2011 | +25.71% | +0.31% |
| 2010 | +30.92% | +4.11% |
| 2009 | +40.69% | -17.22% |
| 2008 | -6.54% | +30.29% |
| 2007 | +29.04% | -3.71% |
| 2006 | -16.62% | +8.87% |
| 2005 | +21.10% | +7.39% |
| 2004 | -20.81% | +41.17% |
| 2003 | +45.36% | +18.55% |
| 2002 | -36.15% | -1.59% |
| 2001 | +22.80% | +4.86% |
| 2000 | +7.51% | +0.59% |
| 1999 | +47.57% | +1.03% |
MMS vs CWT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MMS was -61.45%, occurring on Apr 4, 2003. Recovery took 1551 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CWT was -38.22%, occurring on Jan 10, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current MMS drawdown is -41.39%. The current CWT drawdown is -21.55%.
| Rank | MMS | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -61.45% Aug 14, 2001 - Oct 17, 2007 | -38.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jan 10, 2025 |
| #2 | -51.72% Jan 26, 2000 - May 2, 2001 | -31.27% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 22, 2003 |
| #3 | -45.12% Jan 22, 2026 - Jun 30, 2026 | -30.88% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 17, 2008 |
| #4 | -44.20% Oct 31, 2007 - Sep 23, 2009 | -26.71% Dec 31, 2008 - Feb 19, 2013 |
| #5 | -40.41% Apr 19, 2021 - Jul 16, 2024 | -25.99% Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #6 | -38.81% Sep 13, 2019 - Feb 4, 2021 | -25.15% Apr 21, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 |
| #7 | -34.96% Nov 6, 2015 - Dec 6, 2017 | -22.54% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 12, 2016 |
| #8 | -30.37% Sep 30, 2024 - Jan 7, 2026 | -21.98% Nov 30, 2017 - Nov 16, 2018 |
| #9 | -25.41% Jul 7, 2011 - Nov 11, 2011 | -21.54% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 |
| #10 | -23.26% Oct 22, 2013 - Nov 12, 2014 | -21.46% Jan 10, 2007 - Aug 8, 2007 |
| #11 | -16.79% Apr 23, 2010 - Dec 3, 2010 | -18.56% Aug 9, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 |
| #12 | -15.45% Aug 5, 2015 - Nov 6, 2015 | -17.83% Jun 18, 2003 - Apr 27, 2004 |
| #13 | -15.34% Dec 28, 2017 - Dec 3, 2018 | -14.80% Dec 30, 2004 - Jun 1, 2005 |
| #14 | -14.50% Dec 23, 1999 - Jan 24, 2000 | -14.76% Jul 5, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016 |
| #15 | -13.11% Dec 3, 2018 - Feb 5, 2019 | -14.67% Mar 25, 2014 - Jun 27, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between MMS and CWT is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
MMS vs CWT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MMS | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.15% | 1.31% |
| 2025 | 1.39% | 2.86% |
| 2024 | 1.61% | 2.47% |
| 2023 | 1.36% | 2.01% |
| 2022 | 1.53% | 1.65% |
| 2021 | 1.41% | 1.28% |
| 2020 | 1.53% | 1.57% |
| 2019 | 1.38% | 1.53% |
| 2018 | 0.59% | 1.57% |
| 2017 | 0.25% | 1.59% |
| 2016 | 0.32% | 2.04% |
| 2015 | 0.32% | 2.88% |
| 2014 | 0.33% | 2.64% |
| 2013 | 0.41% | 2.77% |
| 2012 | 0.57% | 3.43% |
| 2011 | 0.80% | 3.37% |
| 2010 | 0.91% | 3.19% |
| 2009 | 0.96% | 3.20% |
| 2008 | 1.14% | 2.52% |
| 2007 | 1.04% | 3.13% |
| 2006 | 1.30% | 3.57% |
| 2005 | 1.09% | 2.98% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 4.11% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 4.74% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 5.42% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 4.13% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks