MICC vs CUBE

Comparison between The Magnum Ice Cream Company N.V. (MICC, Company) and CubeSmart (CUBE, Company).

MICC is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while CUBE is from the Real Estate sector.

MICC vs CUBE - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	MICC(COMPANY)	CUBE(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$9.01B	$8.98B
Max Drawdown	34.27%	93.97%
Sharpe Ratio	0.57	0.04
5Y Beta	0.62	0.48
Industry	Packaged Foods	Reit - Industrial
P/E Ratio	15.97	27.71
Forward P/E	14.39	23.75
PEG Ratio	0.62	5.33
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.24%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	14.35%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	10.22%
Debt to Equity	16.80%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	1.00%	6.81%
P/S Ratio	1.17	8.05
P/B Ratio	12.33	3.39

Market Cap

Winner

MICC

$9.01B

CUBE

$8.98B

Max Drawdown

Winner

MICC

34.27%

CUBE

93.97%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

MICC

0.57

CUBE

0.04

5Y Beta

MICC

0.62

Winner

CUBE

0.48

Industry

MICC

Packaged Foods

CUBE

Reit - Industrial

P/E Ratio

Winner

MICC

15.97

CUBE

27.71

Forward P/E

Winner

MICC

14.39

CUBE

23.75

PEG Ratio

Winner

MICC

0.62

CUBE

5.33

Dividend Yield

MICC

N/A

CUBE

5.24%

5Y Dividends CAGR

MICC

N/A

CUBE

14.35%

5Y EPS CAGR

MICC

N/A

CUBE

10.22%

Debt to Equity

MICC

16.80%

Winner

CUBE

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

MICC

1.00%

Winner

CUBE

6.81%

P/S Ratio

Winner

MICC

1.17

CUBE

8.05

P/B Ratio

MICC

12.33

Winner

CUBE

3.39

MICC vs CUBE - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	MICC	CUBE
1 month	+24.81%	+2.43%
3 months	+2.87%	-1.39%
6 months	+9.42%	+10.25%
1 year	N/A	+0.80%
5 years(CAGR)	N/A	+2.95%
10 years(CAGR)	N/A	+6.73%
Max(CAGR)	+21.33%	+8.36%

Winner

MICC

+24.81%

CUBE

+2.43%

Winner

MICC

+2.87%

CUBE

-1.39%

MICC

+9.42%

Winner

CUBE

+10.25%

MICC

N/A

CUBE

+0.80%

5Y(CAGR)

MICC

N/A

CUBE

+2.95%

10Y(CAGR)

MICC

N/A

CUBE

+6.73%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

MICC

+21.33%

CUBE

+8.36%

MICC vs CUBE - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	MICC	CUBE
2026	+5.32%	+14.61%
2025	+6.23%	-10.06%
2024	N/A	-7.33%
2023	N/A	+23.26%
2022	N/A	-23.50%
2021	N/A	+81.53%
2020	N/A	+12.35%
2019	N/A	+16.61%
2018	N/A	+4.77%
2017	N/A	+13.35%
2016	N/A	-8.83%
2015	N/A	+40.52%
2014	N/A	+42.72%
2013	N/A	+11.44%
2012	N/A	+42.08%
2011	N/A	+13.30%
2010	N/A	+33.91%
2009	N/A	+71.49%
2008	N/A	-47.75%
2007	N/A	-52.66%
2006	N/A	+1.40%
2005	N/A	+28.83%
2004	N/A	+3.71%

MICC vs CUBE Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MICC was -34.27%, occurring on Apr 29, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CUBE was -93.14%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1665 trading sessions.

The current MICC drawdown is -17.84%. The current CUBE drawdown is -19.91%.

Rank	MICC	CUBE
#1	-34.27% Feb 11, 2026 - Apr 29, 2026	-93.14% Feb 21, 2007 - Oct 1, 2013
#2	-9.11% Dec 15, 2025 - Jan 16, 2026	-41.44% Sep 4, 2019 - Oct 12, 2020
#3	-3.89% Jan 26, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026	-36.95% Dec 31, 2021 - Aug 23, 2024
#4	-3.43% Jan 20, 2026 - Jan 26, 2026	-31.93% Sep 16, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025
#5	-2.75% Dec 8, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025	-27.85% Mar 31, 2016 - May 10, 2018
#6	-1.82% Feb 6, 2026 - Feb 11, 2026	-26.88% Feb 22, 2006 - Sep 26, 2006
#7	N/A	-22.38% Oct 18, 2013 - Aug 18, 2014
#8	N/A	-16.36% Jul 6, 2018 - Mar 25, 2019
#9	N/A	-12.67% Jan 6, 2016 - Mar 16, 2016
#10	N/A	-12.27% Feb 5, 2015 - Jul 16, 2015
#11	N/A	-11.95% Sep 8, 2021 - Oct 28, 2021
#12	N/A	-10.41% Oct 15, 2020 - Jan 20, 2021
#13	N/A	-10.39% Sep 12, 2005 - Dec 1, 2005
#14	N/A	-10.19% Oct 13, 2006 - Feb 2, 2007
#15	N/A	-8.21% Aug 18, 2015 - Sep 23, 2015