MHF vs COMB
Comparison between Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund Inc (MHF, ETF) and GRANITESHARES BLOOMBERG COMMODITY BROAD STRATEGY NO K-1 ETF (COMB, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceCOMB has outperformed MHF, delivering a return of +9.9% compared to +1.4%
MHF vs COMB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MHF vs COMB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MHF vs COMB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MHF | COMB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.25% | +19.21% |
| 2025 | +5.62% | +14.51% |
| 2024 | +11.13% | +5.89% |
| 2023 | +3.08% | -6.04% |
| 2022 | -17.27% | +14.58% |
| 2021 | +10.73% | +26.25% |
| 2020 | +2.74% | -2.87% |
| 2019 | +11.83% | +6.97% |
| 2018 | -2.40% | -11.88% |
| 2017 | +7.69% | +4.97% |
| 2016 | -4.81% | N/A |
| 2015 | +6.80% | N/A |
| 2014 | +20.30% | N/A |
| 2013 | -12.41% | N/A |
| 2012 | +6.95% | N/A |
| 2011 | +16.94% | N/A |
| 2010 | +3.58% | N/A |
| 2009 | +18.79% | N/A |
| 2008 | -6.14% | N/A |
| 2007 | -3.49% | N/A |
| 2006 | +15.59% | N/A |
| 2005 | +6.05% | N/A |
| 2004 | -0.82% | N/A |
| 2003 | +9.44% | N/A |
| 2002 | -2.15% | N/A |
| 2001 | +2.25% | N/A |
| 2000 | +21.56% | N/A |
| 1999 | -5.06% | N/A |
MHF vs COMB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MHF was -29.95%, occurring on Oct 6, 2008. Recovery took 412 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for COMB was -33.50%, occurring on Apr 21, 2020. Recovery took 735 trading sessions.
The current MHF drawdown is -5.37%. The current COMB drawdown is -9.92%.
| Rank | MHF | COMB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -29.95% Jul 9, 2008 - Feb 26, 2010 | -33.50% May 23, 2018 - Apr 26, 2021 |
| #2 | -26.72% Oct 25, 2021 - Feb 19, 2025 | -26.48% Jun 7, 2022 - Jan 22, 2026 |
| #3 | -24.97% Feb 25, 2020 - Jan 26, 2021 | -10.79% Mar 8, 2022 - Apr 18, 2022 |
| #4 | -24.71% Sep 26, 2012 - Dec 2, 2015 | -10.77% Oct 25, 2021 - Jan 26, 2022 |
| #5 | -14.28% May 12, 2016 - Sep 19, 2017 | -9.92% May 12, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026 |
| #6 | -14.13% Sep 28, 2010 - Sep 9, 2011 | -8.24% Apr 18, 2022 - Jun 6, 2022 |
| #7 | -13.32% Mar 25, 2025 - Sep 19, 2025 | -7.69% Jan 29, 2026 - Mar 4, 2026 |
| #8 | -13.25% Nov 12, 1999 - Jul 5, 2000 | -6.50% Jul 29, 2021 - Sep 13, 2021 |
| #9 | -12.46% May 10, 2007 - May 30, 2008 | -5.81% Jan 26, 2018 - May 21, 2018 |
| #10 | -11.92% Aug 24, 2001 - Jun 13, 2003 | -5.75% May 24, 2017 - Jul 28, 2017 |
| #11 | -10.85% Mar 23, 2004 - May 26, 2005 | -5.49% Jun 10, 2021 - Jul 2, 2021 |
| #12 | -9.99% Sep 19, 2017 - May 23, 2019 | -5.26% Nov 6, 2017 - Jan 2, 2018 |
| #13 | -9.96% Sep 19, 2025 - Mar 27, 2026 | -5.06% Mar 18, 2026 - Mar 31, 2026 |
| #14 | -9.23% Feb 27, 2012 - May 1, 2012 | -4.38% Apr 6, 2026 - Apr 28, 2026 |
| #15 | -8.80% Jul 1, 2021 - Oct 25, 2021 | -3.76% May 11, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between MHF and COMB is 0.59 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MHF vs COMB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MHF | COMB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.46% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 5.93% | 9.05% |
| 2024 | 5.65% | 2.48% |
| 2023 | 3.78% | 6.57% |
| 2022 | 3.72% | 30.85% |
| 2021 | 3.23% | 15.83% |
| 2020 | 3.75% | 0.07% |
| 2019 | 4.02% | 1.48% |
| 2018 | 4.42% | 0.97% |
| 2017 | 4.14% | 0.20% |
| 2016 | 4.53% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 4.45% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 4.73% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 5.59% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 5.13% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 5.57% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 6.14% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 5.98% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 6.66% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 5.66% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 4.92% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.10% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 7.38% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 7.22% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 7.46% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 7.17% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 7.16% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.34% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks