MFEM vs GGT
Comparison between PIMCO RAFI DYNAMIC MULTI-FACTOR EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF (MFEM, ETF) and Gabelli Multimedia Trust Inc (GGT, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceMFEM has outperformed GGT, delivering a return of +7.2% compared to -2.4%
MFEM vs GGT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MFEM vs GGT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MFEM vs GGT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MFEM | GGT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +19.99% | +10.82% |
| 2025 | +25.82% | +14.58% |
| 2024 | +6.16% | -2.58% |
| 2023 | +14.55% | +20.63% |
| 2022 | -20.63% | -33.05% |
| 2021 | +10.12% | +21.97% |
| 2020 | +9.82% | +13.07% |
| 2019 | +14.99% | +26.38% |
| 2018 | -15.89% | -15.26% |
| 2017 | +4.82% | +39.84% |
| 2016 | N/A | +8.78% |
| 2015 | N/A | -15.82% |
| 2014 | N/A | -7.27% |
| 2013 | N/A | +68.66% |
| 2012 | N/A | +36.68% |
| 2011 | N/A | -15.10% |
| 2010 | N/A | +34.27% |
| 2009 | N/A | +39.45% |
| 2008 | N/A | -61.95% |
| 2007 | N/A | +10.15% |
| 2006 | N/A | +28.06% |
| 2005 | N/A | +0.08% |
| 2004 | N/A | +17.11% |
| 2003 | N/A | +36.60% |
| 2002 | N/A | -30.06% |
| 2001 | N/A | -12.61% |
| 2000 | N/A | -37.99% |
| 1999 | N/A | +14.05% |
MFEM vs GGT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MFEM was -43.32%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 735 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GGT was -80.99%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 3374 trading sessions.
The current MFEM drawdown is -8.31%. The current GGT drawdown is -18.54%.
| Rank | MFEM | GGT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -43.32% Jan 26, 2018 - Dec 28, 2020 | -80.99% Dec 10, 1999 - May 13, 2013 |
| #2 | -31.39% Jun 4, 2021 - Sep 26, 2024 | -57.31% Feb 21, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020 |
| #3 | -19.22% Oct 7, 2024 - Jun 24, 2025 | -49.91% Jul 2, 2021 - Nov 9, 2023 |
| #4 | -12.86% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026 | -38.59% Dec 27, 2013 - May 25, 2017 |
| #5 | -8.31% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026 | -23.78% Jun 14, 2018 - Sep 12, 2019 |
| #6 | -7.46% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 27, 2021 | -12.73% Oct 5, 2017 - Jan 22, 2018 |
| #7 | -6.04% Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021 | -12.13% May 23, 2013 - Jul 5, 2013 |
| #8 | -6.02% May 11, 2026 - May 26, 2026 | -7.91% Jun 14, 2021 - Jun 24, 2021 |
| #9 | -4.76% May 7, 2021 - May 28, 2021 | -7.89% Jan 29, 2018 - Mar 7, 2018 |
| #10 | -4.46% Sep 17, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025 | -7.78% Aug 1, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013 |
| #11 | -4.16% Nov 12, 2025 - Dec 26, 2025 | -7.35% Mar 21, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018 |
| #12 | -3.96% Sep 11, 2017 - Oct 16, 2017 | -6.81% Mar 22, 2021 - Apr 13, 2021 |
| #13 | -3.68% Nov 24, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017 | -6.73% Apr 15, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021 |
| #14 | -3.64% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 12, 2025 | -6.69% Sep 13, 2019 - Feb 19, 2020 |
| #15 | -3.51% Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026 | -6.40% Aug 1, 2017 - Sep 21, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between MFEM and GGT is 0.68 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
MFEM vs GGT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MFEM | GGT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.54% | 8.43% |
| 2025 | 2.77% | 20.95% |
| 2024 | 5.89% | 19.58% |
| 2023 | 4.01% | 15.52% |
| 2022 | 7.01% | 16.45% |
| 2021 | 29.96% | 10.14% |
| 2020 | 1.70% | 11.05% |
| 2019 | 2.37% | 10.97% |
| 2018 | 1.18% | 12.75% |
| 2017 | 0.21% | 9.56% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 11.46% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 12.53% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 10.49% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 7.41% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 10.19% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 13.96% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 7.31% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 12.81% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 5.82% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 5.14% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 5.91% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.67% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 14.55% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks