MET vs FANG
Comparison between Metlife Inc (MET, Company) and Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG, Company).
MET is from the Financial Services sector, while FANG is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceFANG has outperformed MET, delivering a return of +22.2% compared to +10.0%
MET vs FANG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MET vs FANG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MET vs FANG - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MET | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +12.28% | +27.56% |
| 2025 | -0.68% | -7.29% |
| 2024 | +25.32% | +9.01% |
| 2023 | -5.22% | +24.53% |
| 2022 | +17.84% | +30.67% |
| 2021 | +39.94% | +124.93% |
| 2020 | -4.75% | -45.88% |
| 2019 | +26.96% | -1.76% |
| 2018 | -15.17% | -27.29% |
| 2017 | +20.73% | +22.28% |
| 2016 | +18.14% | +52.87% |
| 2015 | -7.99% | +11.63% |
| 2014 | +4.36% | +16.85% |
| 2013 | +56.96% | +174.85% |
| 2012 | +5.14% | +9.26% |
| 2011 | -30.90% | N/A |
| 2010 | +24.58% | N/A |
| 2009 | +0.43% | N/A |
| 2008 | -39.80% | N/A |
| 2007 | +3.63% | N/A |
| 2006 | +18.01% | N/A |
| 2005 | +23.28% | N/A |
| 2004 | +22.16% | N/A |
| 2003 | +21.79% | N/A |
| 2002 | -12.17% | N/A |
| 2001 | -6.14% | N/A |
| 2000 | +127.52% | N/A |
MET vs FANG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MET was -82.33%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2306 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FANG was -88.72%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 841 trading sessions.
The current FANG drawdown is -9.60%.
| Rank | MET | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.33% Oct 5, 2007 - Dec 1, 2016 | -88.72% Oct 3, 2018 - Feb 4, 2022 |
| #2 | -55.16% Feb 12, 2020 - Jan 14, 2021 | -42.60% Jun 23, 2014 - May 26, 2016 |
| #3 | -42.73% Dec 8, 2000 - Mar 29, 2004 | -42.10% Jul 17, 2024 - Mar 26, 2026 |
| #4 | -35.09% Nov 25, 2022 - Mar 27, 2024 | -33.47% Jun 7, 2022 - Oct 31, 2022 |
| #5 | -28.35% Nov 2, 2017 - Jan 2, 2020 | -24.11% Feb 15, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017 |
| #6 | -21.97% Nov 27, 2024 - Jun 9, 2026 | -23.95% Nov 15, 2022 - Oct 12, 2023 |
| #7 | -19.45% Apr 20, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022 | -19.42% Nov 5, 2013 - Feb 7, 2014 |
| #8 | -16.22% May 7, 2021 - Oct 20, 2021 | -18.43% May 21, 2018 - Oct 1, 2018 |
| #9 | -15.13% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 8, 2004 | -16.48% Jan 23, 2018 - Mar 26, 2018 |
| #10 | -13.64% May 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 | -14.97% Mar 26, 2018 - May 8, 2018 |
| #11 | -13.60% Oct 20, 2021 - Jan 6, 2022 | -14.42% Mar 25, 2022 - May 26, 2022 |
| #12 | -13.43% Feb 15, 2022 - Mar 30, 2022 | -13.50% Feb 19, 2013 - Mar 5, 2013 |
| #13 | -12.65% Sep 28, 2000 - Oct 31, 2000 | -13.24% Oct 10, 2016 - Nov 30, 2016 |
| #14 | -12.64% Nov 16, 2000 - Dec 4, 2000 | -11.93% Oct 18, 2023 - Feb 14, 2024 |
| #15 | -11.90% Jun 2, 2000 - Jun 29, 2000 | -11.69% May 4, 2026 - May 8, 2026 |
Correlation
Correlation between MET and FANG is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
MET vs FANG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MET | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.31% | 1.12% |
| 2025 | 2.85% | 2.66% |
| 2024 | 2.63% | 5.06% |
| 2023 | 3.12% | 5.15% |
| 2022 | 2.74% | 6.55% |
| 2021 | 3.04% | 1.62% |
| 2020 | 3.88% | 3.10% |
| 2019 | 3.41% | 0.74% |
| 2018 | 4.04% | 0.40% |
| 2017 | 14.52% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 2.92% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 3.06% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 2.45% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.87% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 2.25% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 2.37% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.67% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 2.09% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.12% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.00% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.68% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.78% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.63% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.57% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks