MED vs TUSK

Comparison between Medifast Inc (MED, Company) and Mammoth Energy Services Inc (TUSK, Company).

MED is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while TUSK is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceTUSK has outperformed MED, delivering a return of -2.3% compared to -44.6%

MED vs TUSK - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	MED(COMPANY)	TUSK(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$137M	$137M
Max Drawdown	97.16%	98.58%
Sharpe Ratio	0.03	0.50
5Y Beta	0.64	0.84
Industry	Personal Services	Conglomerates
P/E Ratio	-5.29	13.34
Forward P/E	12.48	17.54
PEG Ratio	0.97	0.00
5Y Dividends CAGR	36.14%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.92%	-72.36%
P/S Ratio	0.43	2.51
P/B Ratio	0.74	0.48

Market Cap

Winner

MED

$137M

TUSK

$137M

Max Drawdown

Winner

MED

97.16%

TUSK

98.58%

Sharpe Ratio

MED

0.03

Winner

TUSK

0.50

5Y Beta

Winner

MED

0.64

TUSK

0.84

Industry

MED

Personal Services

TUSK

Conglomerates

P/E Ratio

Winner

MED

-5.29

TUSK

13.34

Forward P/E

Winner

MED

12.48

TUSK

17.54

PEG Ratio

MED

0.97

Winner

TUSK

0.00

5Y Dividends CAGR

MED

36.14%

TUSK

N/A

Debt to Equity

MED

0.00%

TUSK

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

MED

2.92%

TUSK

-72.36%

P/S Ratio

Winner

MED

0.43

TUSK

2.51

P/B Ratio

MED

0.74

Winner

TUSK

0.48

MED vs TUSK - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	MED	TUSK
1 month	+9.78%	-5.16%
3 months	-4.49%	+17.60%
6 months	+6.69%	+26.18%
1 year	-6.48%	+17.13%
5 years(CAGR)	-44.57%	-2.28%
10 years(CAGR)	-7.87%	-14.04%
Max(CAGR)	+18.01%	-14.04%

Winner

MED

+9.78%

TUSK

-5.16%

MED

-4.49%

Winner

TUSK

+17.60%

MED

+6.69%

Winner

TUSK

+26.18%

MED

-6.48%

Winner

TUSK

+17.13%

5Y(CAGR)

MED

-44.57%

Winner

TUSK

-2.28%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

MED

-7.87%

TUSK

-14.04%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

MED

+18.01%

TUSK

-14.04%

MED vs TUSK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	MED	TUSK
2026	+16.54%	+49.24%
2025	-38.23%	-37.92%
2024	-74.91%	-32.13%
2023	-38.30%	-33.73%
2022	-44.02%	+348.19%
2021	+11.51%	-58.45%
2020	+82.55%	+103.20%
2019	-10.87%	-88.38%
2018	+75.31%	-11.08%
2017	+70.80%	+27.63%
2016	+50.07%	+14.63%
2015	-5.01%	N/A
2014	+28.64%	N/A
2013	-0.61%	N/A
2012	+76.88%	N/A
2011	-54.01%	N/A
2010	-13.09%	N/A
2009	+416.55%	N/A
2008	+11.52%	N/A
2007	-60.28%	N/A
2006	+132.78%	N/A
2005	+47.19%	N/A
2004	-74.84%	N/A
2003	+166.04%	N/A
2002	+2318.18%	N/A
2001	+57.14%	N/A
2000	-58.82%	N/A
1999	+0.00%	N/A

MED vs TUSK Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MED was -96.79%, occurring on Jul 23, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for TUSK was -98.55%, occurring on Apr 7, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current MED drawdown is -95.89%. The current TUSK drawdown is -92.65%.

Rank	MED	TUSK
#1	-96.79% May 28, 2021 - Jul 23, 2026	-98.55% Jun 22, 2018 - Apr 7, 2020
#2	-85.56% Nov 6, 2003 - Jun 2, 2006	-50.78% Mar 1, 2017 - Jan 8, 2018
#3	-83.16% Jun 21, 2006 - Sep 16, 2009	-19.17% Jan 23, 2018 - Feb 26, 2018
#4	-81.33% Jan 14, 2000 - Feb 8, 2002	-15.36% Dec 6, 2016 - Jan 13, 2017
#5	-80.80% Dec 7, 1999 - Jan 13, 2000	-13.33% Oct 24, 2016 - Nov 15, 2016
#6	-78.91% Sep 12, 2018 - Jan 25, 2021	-13.18% May 21, 2018 - May 29, 2018
#7	-64.63% May 13, 2010 - Aug 15, 2016	-12.82% Mar 12, 2018 - Apr 4, 2018
#8	-57.39% Nov 8, 1999 - Dec 7, 1999	-11.74% Apr 18, 2018 - May 17, 2018
#9	-52.90% Dec 28, 2009 - May 12, 2010	-8.47% Jun 6, 2018 - Jun 21, 2018
#10	-37.87% Jan 8, 2003 - Apr 21, 2003	-4.92% Jan 20, 2017 - Feb 3, 2017
#11	-35.00% Mar 8, 2002 - Aug 5, 2002	-4.52% Apr 4, 2018 - Apr 18, 2018
#12	-32.60% Jul 14, 2003 - Nov 6, 2003	-4.19% Feb 3, 2017 - Feb 14, 2017
#13	-27.65% Aug 12, 2002 - Sep 16, 2002	-4.02% May 29, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018
#14	-27.16% Jun 5, 2003 - Jul 11, 2003	-3.84% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 19, 2018
#15	-24.94% Jun 2, 2006 - Jun 21, 2006	-2.93% Jan 9, 2018 - Jan 11, 2018