MDLZ vs AMT
Comparison between Mondelez International Inc - Class A (MDLZ, Company) and American Tower Corp (AMT, Company).
MDLZ is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while AMT is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceMDLZ has outperformed AMT, delivering a return of +2.4% compared to -6.4%
MDLZ vs AMT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MDLZ vs AMT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MDLZ vs AMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MDLZ | AMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +18.16% | +1.17% |
| 2025 | -6.67% | +0.36% |
| 2024 | -16.92% | -13.33% |
| 2023 | +11.85% | +3.98% |
| 2022 | +3.45% | -24.04% |
| 2021 | +16.99% | +35.83% |
| 2020 | +10.03% | +0.10% |
| 2019 | +40.92% | +49.22% |
| 2018 | -3.39% | +14.56% |
| 2017 | -2.73% | +37.08% |
| 2016 | +2.96% | +11.50% |
| 2015 | +23.80% | -0.83% |
| 2014 | +6.05% | +26.35% |
| 2013 | +34.64% | +2.43% |
| 2012 | +7.06% | +33.09% |
| 2011 | +22.02% | +16.93% |
| 2010 | +19.29% | +18.82% |
| 2009 | +4.02% | +43.13% |
| 2008 | -13.02% | -28.90% |
| 2007 | -5.45% | +12.11% |
| 2006 | +31.08% | +36.56% |
| 2005 | -16.93% | +49.23% |
| 2004 | +13.65% | +67.73% |
| 2003 | -16.00% | +181.04% |
| 2002 | +13.65% | -64.66% |
| 2001 | +9.74% | -73.88% |
| 2000 | N/A | +29.24% |
| 1999 | N/A | +61.35% |
MDLZ vs AMT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MDLZ was -42.49%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2224 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for AMT was -98.70%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 2747 trading sessions.
The current MDLZ drawdown is -12.79%. The current AMT drawdown is -33.19%.
| Rank | MDLZ | AMT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -42.49% Jun 18, 2002 - Apr 15, 2011 | -98.70% Mar 10, 2000 - Feb 10, 2011 |
| #2 | -29.74% Feb 14, 2020 - Oct 13, 2020 | -45.32% Sep 8, 2021 - Oct 4, 2023 |
| #3 | -29.14% May 11, 2023 - Jan 7, 2026 | -30.29% Feb 13, 2020 - Apr 9, 2020 |
| #4 | -22.29% Oct 22, 2015 - May 15, 2017 | -26.02% Jul 29, 2020 - Jun 7, 2021 |
| #5 | -18.76% Jun 2, 2017 - Jan 31, 2019 | -19.19% Nov 2, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 |
| #6 | -18.34% Jan 21, 2022 - Nov 30, 2022 | -18.95% May 21, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 |
| #7 | -16.39% Jul 14, 2014 - Nov 18, 2014 | -18.30% Feb 11, 2011 - Oct 24, 2011 |
| #8 | -12.46% Aug 6, 2015 - Oct 22, 2015 | -16.81% Jan 21, 2000 - Feb 10, 2000 |
| #9 | -12.05% Nov 28, 2014 - May 7, 2015 | -15.63% Nov 28, 2014 - Nov 2, 2015 |
| #10 | -11.05% Apr 23, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013 | -14.31% Sep 4, 2019 - Feb 10, 2020 |
| #11 | -10.59% Jan 10, 2014 - Apr 28, 2014 | -14.00% Jul 22, 2016 - Mar 21, 2017 |
| #12 | -10.51% Oct 4, 2012 - Jan 17, 2013 | -12.48% Nov 8, 2017 - Aug 3, 2018 |
| #13 | -10.45% Jul 27, 2021 - Dec 16, 2021 | -11.73% Apr 9, 2020 - Jun 1, 2020 |
| #14 | -9.83% Dec 4, 2020 - Mar 22, 2021 | -10.87% Feb 16, 2000 - Feb 29, 2000 |
| #15 | -9.81% Oct 13, 2020 - Dec 4, 2020 | -9.20% Dec 20, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between MDLZ and AMT is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)
MDLZ vs AMT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MDLZ | AMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.60% | 2.06% |
| 2025 | 3.60% | 3.87% |
| 2024 | 3.00% | 3.53% |
| 2023 | 2.24% | 2.99% |
| 2022 | 2.21% | 2.77% |
| 2021 | 2.01% | 1.78% |
| 2020 | 2.05% | 2.02% |
| 2019 | 1.98% | 1.64% |
| 2018 | 2.40% | 1.99% |
| 2017 | 1.92% | 1.84% |
| 2016 | 1.62% | 2.05% |
| 2015 | 1.43% | 1.87% |
| 2014 | 1.60% | 1.42% |
| 2013 | 1.53% | 1.38% |
| 2012 | 61.68% | 1.16% |
| 2011 | 3.10% | 0.58% |
| 2010 | 3.68% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 4.27% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 4.17% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 3.19% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.69% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.09% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.16% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.05% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.44% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks