MCS vs UHT
Comparison between Marcus Corp (MCS, Company) and Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT, Company).
MCS is from the Communication Services sector, while UHT is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceMCS has outperformed UHT, delivering a return of -0.3% compared to -4.3%
MCS vs UHT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MCS vs UHT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MCS vs UHT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MCS | UHT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +34.85% | +6.86% |
| 2025 | -25.49% | +15.59% |
| 2024 | +51.31% | -8.75% |
| 2023 | +3.09% | -4.23% |
| 2022 | -20.19% | -15.70% |
| 2021 | +39.86% | -0.90% |
| 2020 | -57.86% | -41.67% |
| 2019 | -18.26% | +99.26% |
| 2018 | +44.08% | -13.35% |
| 2017 | -11.93% | +18.78% |
| 2016 | +78.63% | +40.50% |
| 2015 | +5.33% | +7.36% |
| 2014 | +40.08% | +26.95% |
| 2013 | +5.14% | -18.36% |
| 2012 | +8.76% | +36.86% |
| 2011 | -4.57% | +12.48% |
| 2010 | +3.39% | +22.27% |
| 2009 | -19.67% | +7.59% |
| 2008 | +11.02% | +2.96% |
| 2007 | -39.27% | -3.43% |
| 2006 | +55.85% | +29.47% |
| 2005 | -3.39% | +4.15% |
| 2004 | +59.03% | +15.66% |
| 2003 | +14.54% | +23.74% |
| 2002 | +1.11% | +20.43% |
| 2001 | +19.81% | +33.92% |
| 2000 | +3.00% | +54.26% |
| 1999 | -4.82% | -9.77% |
MCS vs UHT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MCS was -83.84%, occurring on Oct 14, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for UHT was -69.01%, occurring on Apr 17, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current MCS drawdown is -50.09%. The current UHT drawdown is -54.40%.
| Rank | MCS | UHT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -83.84% Jan 29, 2019 - Oct 14, 2020 | -69.01% Feb 13, 2020 - Apr 17, 2024 |
| #2 | -72.89% Dec 27, 2006 - Jul 18, 2014 | -40.55% Sep 18, 2008 - Mar 10, 2010 |
| #3 | -40.88% Nov 12, 1999 - Oct 31, 2000 | -33.64% Apr 12, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 |
| #4 | -31.91% May 1, 2002 - Jan 13, 2004 | -33.12% Jul 19, 2017 - Apr 5, 2019 |
| #5 | -30.39% Jun 21, 2001 - Jan 31, 2002 | -28.18% Feb 7, 2007 - Sep 16, 2008 |
| #6 | -29.41% Apr 27, 2017 - Jul 26, 2018 | -27.00% Apr 1, 2004 - Nov 15, 2004 |
| #7 | -28.87% Dec 20, 2004 - Mar 24, 2006 | -23.77% Jul 25, 2011 - Jun 28, 2012 |
| #8 | -25.21% Jul 18, 2014 - Feb 17, 2015 | -22.55% Jul 11, 2005 - Oct 16, 2006 |
| #9 | -21.00% Nov 10, 2000 - Feb 7, 2001 | -22.40% Mar 24, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016 |
| #10 | -17.84% Mar 12, 2004 - Jul 15, 2004 | -17.80% Dec 13, 2004 - May 3, 2005 |
| #11 | -17.73% Apr 8, 2015 - Jul 5, 2016 | -16.25% May 15, 2001 - Sep 7, 2001 |
| #12 | -15.41% Oct 16, 2018 - Jan 29, 2019 | -15.30% Mar 24, 2010 - Oct 5, 2010 |
| #13 | -12.52% Mar 31, 2006 - Jun 29, 2006 | -15.09% Jul 19, 2002 - Mar 21, 2003 |
| #14 | -12.01% Feb 7, 2001 - May 4, 2001 | -13.88% Sep 28, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016 |
| #15 | -11.88% Jul 5, 2006 - Sep 12, 2006 | -12.40% Jan 10, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between MCS and UHT is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MCS vs UHT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MCS | UHT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.79% | 1.81% |
| 2025 | 1.93% | 7.55% |
| 2024 | 1.30% | 7.85% |
| 2023 | 1.65% | 6.66% |
| 2022 | 0.69% | 5.95% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 4.71% |
| 2020 | 1.26% | 4.29% |
| 2019 | 2.01% | 2.32% |
| 2018 | 1.52% | 4.37% |
| 2017 | 1.83% | 3.51% |
| 2016 | 1.43% | 3.96% |
| 2015 | 2.16% | 5.12% |
| 2014 | 2.00% | 5.24% |
| 2013 | 1.26% | 6.23% |
| 2012 | 12.11% | 4.86% |
| 2011 | 2.70% | 6.22% |
| 2010 | 2.56% | 6.61% |
| 2009 | 2.65% | 7.43% |
| 2008 | 2.09% | 7.11% |
| 2007 | 2.20% | 6.49% |
| 2006 | 28.56% | 5.80% |
| 2005 | 0.94% | 6.94% |
| 2004 | 0.88% | 7.78% |
| 2003 | 1.34% | 8.14% |
| 2002 | 1.55% | 9.14% |
| 2001 | 1.55% | 9.98% |
| 2000 | 1.73% | 11.59% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 3.15% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks