MCI vs HAP
Comparison between Barings Corporate Investors (MCI, ETF) and VANECK NATURAL RESOURCES ETF (HAP, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceMCI has outperformed HAP, delivering a return of +12.1% compared to +11.2%
MCI vs HAP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MCI vs HAP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MCI vs HAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MCI | HAP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -1.97% | +16.41% |
| 2025 | -2.24% | +33.91% |
| 2024 | +25.47% | -3.97% |
| 2023 | +44.43% | +3.89% |
| 2022 | -5.06% | +6.89% |
| 2021 | +28.28% | +24.01% |
| 2020 | -15.03% | +5.73% |
| 2019 | +20.89% | +18.58% |
| 2018 | +2.87% | -11.67% |
| 2017 | +6.96% | +15.77% |
| 2016 | -3.80% | +25.98% |
| 2015 | +19.34% | -19.85% |
| 2014 | +14.78% | -6.34% |
| 2013 | +2.90% | +4.62% |
| 2012 | -4.33% | +5.13% |
| 2011 | +24.49% | -12.33% |
| 2010 | +31.19% | +13.27% |
| 2009 | +44.56% | +38.05% |
| 2008 | -27.72% | -35.61% |
| 2007 | -6.42% | N/A |
| 2006 | +23.05% | N/A |
| 2005 | +15.14% | N/A |
| 2004 | +35.66% | N/A |
| 2003 | +28.22% | N/A |
| 2002 | -0.10% | N/A |
| 2001 | -0.01% | N/A |
| 2000 | +18.33% | N/A |
| 1999 | +15.71% | N/A |
MCI vs HAP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MCI was -57.11%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 887 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for HAP was -50.73%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 534 trading sessions.
The current MCI drawdown is -21.36%. The current HAP drawdown is -4.42%.
| Rank | MCI | HAP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -57.11% Feb 7, 2007 - Aug 16, 2010 | -50.73% Sep 23, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 |
| #2 | -44.64% Feb 14, 2020 - Aug 11, 2021 | -44.07% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 |
| #3 | -27.61% Feb 20, 2025 - May 11, 2026 | -40.58% Jul 3, 2014 - Jan 2, 2018 |
| #4 | -24.09% Aug 15, 2016 - Feb 22, 2019 | -30.48% Apr 5, 2011 - Jun 19, 2014 |
| #5 | -22.89% Aug 27, 2001 - Aug 21, 2003 | -25.66% Apr 20, 2022 - Jun 12, 2025 |
| #6 | -20.91% Jan 18, 2022 - Jun 13, 2023 | -11.27% May 10, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022 |
| #7 | -20.24% May 26, 2011 - Oct 6, 2011 | -10.24% Sep 3, 2008 - Sep 23, 2008 |
| #8 | -20.21% Jan 17, 2012 - Jan 16, 2013 | -8.31% Mar 2, 2026 - May 13, 2026 |
| #9 | -19.37% Feb 16, 2000 - May 26, 2000 | -8.02% Mar 3, 2011 - Mar 30, 2011 |
| #10 | -17.12% May 22, 2013 - Nov 17, 2014 | -7.26% Jan 14, 2021 - Feb 12, 2021 |
| #11 | -13.04% Mar 7, 2001 - May 15, 2001 | -7.18% May 13, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026 |
| #12 | -12.54% Feb 14, 2005 - Jun 17, 2005 | -5.68% Mar 15, 2021 - Apr 15, 2021 |
| #13 | -12.46% Dec 5, 2011 - Jan 17, 2012 | -5.48% Nov 11, 2010 - Dec 10, 2010 |
| #14 | -12.18% Dec 17, 1999 - Feb 16, 2000 | -4.56% Jan 12, 2022 - Feb 7, 2022 |
| #15 | -11.79% Nov 18, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 | -4.14% Nov 12, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between MCI and HAP is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MCI vs HAP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MCI | HAP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.25% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 8.82% | 2.27% |
| 2024 | 8.29% | 2.65% |
| 2023 | 7.70% | 3.27% |
| 2022 | 7.31% | 3.28% |
| 2021 | 6.01% | 2.16% |
| 2020 | 7.28% | 2.45% |
| 2019 | 7.12% | 2.80% |
| 2018 | 8.16% | 2.85% |
| 2017 | 7.86% | 2.02% |
| 2016 | 7.75% | 1.99% |
| 2015 | 6.96% | 3.00% |
| 2014 | 7.55% | 2.51% |
| 2013 | 8.04% | 2.22% |
| 2012 | 10.47% | 2.38% |
| 2011 | 7.50% | 1.96% |
| 2010 | 7.07% | 0.81% |
| 2009 | 8.61% | 0.73% |
| 2008 | 11.22% | 0.27% |
| 2007 | 8.51% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 7.11% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 7.62% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 7.58% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.46% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 7.39% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 9.08% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 12.55% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 6.83% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks