MAT vs PHI
Comparison between Mattel Inc (MAT, Company) and PLDT Inc (PHI, Company).
MAT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while PHI is from the Communication Services sector.
5-Year PerformancePHI has outperformed MAT, delivering a return of +1.9% compared to -5.5%
MAT vs PHI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MAT vs PHI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MAT vs PHI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MAT | PHI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -26.90% | -7.47% |
| 2025 | +11.90% | +5.10% |
| 2024 | -5.54% | +0.80% |
| 2023 | +5.53% | +7.55% |
| 2022 | -17.94% | -31.32% |
| 2021 | +24.99% | +32.22% |
| 2020 | +31.20% | +51.15% |
| 2019 | +38.83% | -1.35% |
| 2018 | -37.64% | -28.25% |
| 2017 | -43.75% | +12.73% |
| 2016 | +5.43% | -30.41% |
| 2015 | -5.11% | -29.14% |
| 2014 | -31.80% | +13.92% |
| 2013 | +33.63% | +1.57% |
| 2012 | +36.87% | +10.84% |
| 2011 | +11.49% | +9.71% |
| 2010 | +31.33% | +10.47% |
| 2009 | +24.52% | +29.35% |
| 2008 | -8.70% | -33.36% |
| 2007 | -14.30% | +53.61% |
| 2006 | +50.52% | +51.18% |
| 2005 | -15.00% | +39.11% |
| 2004 | +3.38% | +37.79% |
| 2003 | -1.19% | +259.18% |
| 2002 | +14.27% | -37.82% |
| 2001 | +25.88% | -50.92% |
| 2000 | +13.40% | -36.32% |
| 1999 | -2.57% | +27.93% |
MAT vs PHI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MAT was -81.63%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for PHI was -85.86%, occurring on Oct 22, 2002. Recovery took 1359 trading sessions.
The current MAT drawdown is -62.77%. The current PHI drawdown is -50.01%.
| Rank | MAT | PHI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -81.63% Dec 30, 2013 - Mar 23, 2020 | -85.86% Jan 3, 2000 - Jun 1, 2005 |
| #2 | -61.36% Apr 5, 2007 - Dec 1, 2010 | -73.00% Sep 5, 2014 - Mar 18, 2020 |
| #3 | -38.85% Nov 26, 1999 - Jun 8, 2000 | -47.13% Dec 31, 2007 - Oct 4, 2010 |
| #4 | -34.16% Mar 21, 2003 - Oct 17, 2006 | -23.91% May 15, 2013 - Aug 14, 2014 |
| #5 | -33.60% Jun 8, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001 | -23.88% Oct 7, 2010 - Dec 20, 2011 |
| #6 | -29.05% Jun 21, 2002 - Mar 20, 2003 | -23.65% May 8, 2006 - Sep 15, 2006 |
| #7 | -19.93% Jul 17, 2001 - Oct 25, 2001 | -18.33% Jan 20, 2012 - Jul 3, 2012 |
| #8 | -18.07% Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 10, 2011 | -17.74% Jul 23, 2007 - Aug 31, 2007 |
| #9 | -17.87% Mar 21, 2001 - Jun 29, 2001 | -17.11% Jan 24, 2007 - May 29, 2007 |
| #10 | -14.71% Nov 15, 2001 - Mar 15, 2002 | -13.11% Sep 14, 2012 - Jan 30, 2013 |
| #11 | -13.46% Jul 12, 2013 - Dec 26, 2013 | -12.02% Nov 5, 1999 - Dec 10, 1999 |
| #12 | -10.37% Dec 22, 2010 - Apr 15, 2011 | -9.85% Dec 10, 1999 - Jan 3, 2000 |
| #13 | -10.24% Mar 26, 2012 - Jul 17, 2012 | -9.29% Aug 11, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 |
| #14 | -7.25% Apr 25, 2002 - Jun 10, 2002 | -9.22% Jan 9, 2006 - Jan 27, 2006 |
| #15 | -7.11% Oct 18, 2012 - Nov 30, 2012 | -8.25% Feb 6, 2006 - Mar 17, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between MAT and PHI is 0.81 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MAT vs PHI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MAT | PHI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 4.09% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 7.61% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 7.65% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 8.37% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 9.47% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 4.67% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 5.54% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 6.85% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 2.50% |
| 2017 | 5.92% | 5.00% |
| 2016 | 5.52% | 8.26% |
| 2015 | 5.59% | 7.83% |
| 2014 | 4.91% | 6.52% |
| 2013 | 3.03% | 6.93% |
| 2012 | 3.39% | 6.58% |
| 2011 | 3.31% | 8.99% |
| 2010 | 3.26% | 8.49% |
| 2009 | 3.75% | 6.42% |
| 2008 | 4.69% | 7.97% |
| 2007 | 3.94% | 3.64% |
| 2006 | 2.87% | 2.51% |
| 2005 | 3.16% | 2.60% |
| 2004 | 2.31% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.08% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.26% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.29% | 0.25% |
| 2000 | 1.87% | 0.55% |
| 1999 | 0.69% | 0.10% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks