StockComparison Logo
vs

MAR vs USB

Comparison between Marriott International Inc - Class A (MAR, Company) and U.S. Bancorp. (USB, Company).

MAR is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while USB is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceMAR has outperformed USB, delivering a return of +22.2% compared to +6.7%

MAR vs USB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
MAR
$98B
USB
$98B
Max Drawdown
Winner
MAR
75.92%
USB
76.78%
Sharpe Ratio
MAR
1.16
Winner
USB
1.61
5Y Beta
MAR
1.00
Winner
USB
0.96
Industry
MAR
Lodging
USB
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
MAR
35.84
Winner
USB
13.13
Forward P/E
MAR
31.75
Winner
USB
12.47
PEG Ratio
MAR
3.12
Winner
USB
0.62
Dividend Yield
MAR
0.73%
Winner
USB
3.29%
5Y Dividends CAGR
MAR
N/A
USB
8.96%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
MAR
18.24%
USB
1.81%
Debt to Equity
Winner
MAR
-0.56%
USB
27.15%
Free Cash Flow Yield
MAR
2.61%
Winner
USB
9.80%
P/S Ratio
MAR
13.33
Winner
USB
3.63
P/B Ratio
MAR
443.63
Winner
USB
1.65

MAR vs USB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
MAR
-4.26%
Winner
USB
+9.51%
3M
MAR
-1.84%
Winner
USB
+13.05%
6M
MAR
+15.19%
Winner
USB
+17.00%
1Y
MAR
+36.64%
Winner
USB
+44.69%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
MAR
+22.23%
USB
+6.71%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
MAR
+19.07%
USB
+8.17%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
MAR
+13.59%
USB
+6.65%

MAR vs USB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearMARUSB
2026+17.81%+20.34%
2025+14.15%+16.41%
2024+26.99%+13.90%
2023+54.22%+2.32%
2022-8.61%-20.67%
2021+32.44%+25.58%
2020-12.57%-17.76%
2019+42.97%+31.73%
2018-17.84%-13.09%
2017+66.58%+6.43%
2016+28.56%+26.94%
2015-12.70%-2.55%
2014+61.32%+15.22%
2013+29.17%+25.53%
2012+25.92%+18.63%
2011-25.46%+2.40%
2010+51.27%+18.85%
2009+38.07%-9.92%
2008-40.31%-15.09%
2007-27.32%-7.84%
2006+42.26%+24.66%
2005+7.74%+0.40%
2004+37.37%+11.29%
2003+36.79%+43.93%
2002-17.17%+7.14%
2001-0.38%-5.32%
2000+39.42%+39.78%
1999-5.62%-34.20%

MAR vs USB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MAR was -75.59%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1649 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for USB was -76.09%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 1019 trading sessions.

The current MAR drawdown is -8.63%. The current USB drawdown is -0.47%.

RankMARUSB
#1-75.59%
Apr 18, 2007 - Nov 1, 2013
-76.09%
Sep 19, 2008 - Oct 4, 2012
#2-61.26%
Dec 26, 2019 - Feb 24, 2021
-53.51%
Nov 16, 1999 - Jul 14, 2003
#3-46.10%
May 22, 2001 - May 21, 2004
-52.12%
Jan 14, 2022 - Dec 10, 2025
#4-30.92%
Jan 29, 2018 - Dec 12, 2019
-51.99%
Dec 17, 2019 - Apr 9, 2021
#5-30.50%
Feb 10, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025
-34.05%
May 1, 2008 - Sep 16, 2008
#6-30.49%
Mar 2, 2015 - Dec 7, 2016
-23.25%
Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 23, 2019
#7-29.95%
Apr 20, 2022 - Jul 10, 2023
-18.57%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 25, 2008
#8-25.38%
Nov 15, 1999 - May 15, 2000
-17.63%
Aug 10, 2015 - Oct 27, 2016
#9-19.21%
Feb 16, 2022 - Apr 19, 2022
-16.21%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026
#10-19.15%
Jan 23, 2001 - May 2, 2001
-13.67%
Dec 31, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004
#11-18.03%
Apr 11, 2024 - Oct 9, 2024
-12.58%
Oct 22, 2021 - Jan 12, 2022
#12-17.47%
Jul 11, 2005 - Apr 4, 2006
-12.36%
Dec 31, 2004 - Nov 11, 2005
#13-17.46%
Feb 24, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021
-12.01%
May 17, 2021 - Oct 5, 2021
#14-17.13%
Jul 27, 2000 - Nov 14, 2000
-11.44%
Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017
#15-15.38%
Nov 8, 2021 - Feb 8, 2022
-11.31%
Oct 4, 2012 - May 20, 2013

Correlation

Correlation between MAR and USB is 0.88 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.88
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

MAR vs USB dividend yield comparison.

YearMARUSB
20260.38%1.63%
20250.85%3.82%
20240.86%4.14%
20230.87%4.46%
20220.67%4.31%
20210.00%3.13%
20200.36%3.61%
20191.22%2.66%
20181.44%2.93%
20170.95%2.16%
20161.39%2.08%
20151.42%2.37%
20140.99%2.15%
20131.30%2.19%
20121.31%2.44%
20117.28%1.85%
20100.50%0.74%
20091.27%0.89%
20081.74%6.80%
20070.84%5.12%
20060.50%3.84%
20050.60%4.12%
20040.52%4.58%
20030.64%2.87%
20020.84%3.68%
20010.78%3.58%
20000.55%4.87%
19990.17%1.33%

Select Stocks to Compare