StockComparison Logo
vs

MAR vs CNQ

Comparison between Marriott International Inc - Class A (MAR, Company) and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ, Company).

MAR is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while CNQ is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceCNQ has outperformed MAR, delivering a return of +27.7% compared to +20.1%

MAR vs CNQ - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
MAR
$96B
CNQ
$95B
Max Drawdown
Winner
MAR
75.92%
CNQ
85.40%
Sharpe Ratio
MAR
1.25
Winner
CNQ
1.71
5Y Beta
MAR
1.05
Winner
CNQ
0.57
Industry
MAR
Lodging
CNQ
Oil & Gas E&p
P/E Ratio
MAR
34.87
Winner
CNQ
12.24
Forward P/E
MAR
31.06
Winner
CNQ
13.62
PEG Ratio
MAR
3.03
Winner
CNQ
0.15
Dividend Yield
MAR
0.76%
Winner
CNQ
5.15%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
MAR
47.14%
CNQ
26.57%
5Y EPS CAGR
MAR
18.24%
CNQ
N/A
Debt to Equity
Winner
MAR
-0.56%
CNQ
44.46%
Free Cash Flow Yield
MAR
2.68%
Winner
CNQ
6.24%
P/S Ratio
MAR
13.63
Winner
CNQ
2.46
P/B Ratio
MAR
443.63
Winner
CNQ
3.06

MAR vs CNQ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
MAR
+1.32%
CNQ
-4.11%
3M
MAR
+6.84%
Winner
CNQ
+14.71%
6M
MAR
+21.82%
Winner
CNQ
+43.76%
1Y
MAR
+37.50%
Winner
CNQ
+55.52%
5Y(CAGR)
MAR
+20.11%
Winner
CNQ
+27.71%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
MAR
+18.83%
CNQ
+18.39%
Max(CAGR)
MAR
+13.52%
Winner
CNQ
+16.60%

MAR vs CNQ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearMARCNQ
2026+12.90%+30.92%
2025+14.15%+13.74%
2024+26.99%-1.65%
2023+54.22%+31.66%
2022-8.61%+40.31%
2021+32.44%+80.91%
2020-12.57%-17.44%
2019+42.97%+36.24%
2018-17.84%-31.52%
2017+66.58%+13.77%
2016+28.56%+54.53%
2015-12.70%-26.51%
2014+61.32%-4.38%
2013+29.17%+16.22%
2012+25.92%-25.68%
2011-25.46%-16.43%
2010+51.27%+21.44%
2009+38.07%+69.80%
2008-40.31%-46.25%
2007-27.32%+50.65%
2006+42.26%+5.17%
2005+7.74%+145.96%
2004+37.37%+67.11%
2003+36.79%+69.98%
2002-17.17%+25.53%
2001-0.38%-12.45%
2000+39.42%-1.37%
1999-5.62%N/A

MAR vs CNQ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MAR was -75.59%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1649 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CNQ was -80.77%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 3261 trading sessions.

The current MAR drawdown is -6.74%. The current CNQ drawdown is -11.12%.

RankMARCNQ
#1-75.59%
Apr 18, 2007 - Nov 1, 2013
-80.77%
Jun 18, 2008 - Jun 2, 2021
#2-61.26%
Dec 26, 2019 - Feb 24, 2021
-37.34%
Sep 15, 2000 - May 14, 2003
#3-46.10%
May 22, 2001 - May 21, 2004
-35.85%
Apr 10, 2024 - Jan 29, 2026
#4-30.92%
Jan 29, 2018 - Dec 12, 2019
-34.46%
Feb 6, 2006 - May 7, 2007
#5-30.50%
Feb 10, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025
-31.51%
Apr 20, 2022 - Aug 28, 2023
#6-30.49%
Mar 2, 2015 - Dec 7, 2016
-29.76%
Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 21, 2008
#7-29.95%
Apr 20, 2022 - Jul 10, 2023
-25.45%
Sep 1, 2005 - Dec 12, 2005
#8-25.38%
Nov 15, 1999 - May 15, 2000
-19.02%
Jun 15, 2021 - Oct 4, 2021
#9-19.21%
Feb 16, 2022 - Apr 19, 2022
-17.56%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 3, 2005
#10-19.15%
Jan 23, 2001 - May 2, 2001
-16.41%
Jul 19, 2007 - Sep 13, 2007
#11-18.03%
Apr 11, 2024 - Oct 9, 2024
-14.72%
Oct 22, 2004 - Jan 27, 2005
#12-17.47%
Jul 11, 2005 - Apr 4, 2006
-14.15%
Mar 27, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#13-17.46%
Feb 24, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021
-14.03%
Apr 15, 2004 - Jun 24, 2004
#14-17.13%
Jul 27, 2000 - Nov 14, 2000
-12.99%
Aug 12, 2005 - Aug 31, 2005
#15-15.38%
Nov 8, 2021 - Feb 8, 2022
-12.42%
Jan 5, 2004 - Mar 1, 2004

Correlation

Correlation between MAR and CNQ is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.91
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

MAR vs CNQ dividend yield comparison.

YearMARCNQ
20260.19%1.02%
20250.85%5.01%
20240.86%5.02%
20230.87%4.17%
20220.67%6.31%
20210.00%3.78%
20200.36%5.26%
20191.22%3.49%
20181.44%4.56%
20170.95%3.08%
20161.39%2.94%
20151.42%4.21%
20140.99%2.92%
20131.30%1.70%
20121.31%1.46%
20117.28%0.96%
20100.50%0.68%
20091.27%0.58%
20081.74%1.00%
20070.84%0.46%
20060.50%0.66%
20050.60%0.55%
20040.52%1.11%
20030.64%1.19%
20020.84%0.80%
20010.78%0.79%
20000.55%0.00%
19990.17%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare