MAC vs FLG
Comparison between Macerich Company (MAC, Company) and New York Community Bancorp Inc (FLG, Company).
MAC is from the Real Estate sector, while FLG is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceMAC has outperformed FLG, delivering a return of +13.6% compared to -14.9%
MAC vs FLG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MAC vs FLG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MAC vs FLG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MAC | FLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +19.56% | +5.78% |
| 2025 | -5.20% | +36.70% |
| 2024 | +33.42% | -69.65% |
| 2023 | +46.90% | +26.16% |
| 2022 | -32.38% | -25.85% |
| 2021 | +68.64% | +23.21% |
| 2020 | -55.04% | -4.60% |
| 2019 | -31.47% | +33.32% |
| 2018 | -31.52% | -23.52% |
| 2017 | -3.05% | -13.94% |
| 2016 | -7.54% | +4.65% |
| 2015 | +1.57% | +8.63% |
| 2014 | +48.48% | +2.66% |
| 2013 | +4.11% | +34.66% |
| 2012 | +18.93% | +12.20% |
| 2011 | +9.66% | -30.27% |
| 2010 | +43.61% | +38.83% |
| 2009 | +125.69% | +30.55% |
| 2008 | -72.27% | -26.64% |
| 2007 | -15.53% | +15.05% |
| 2006 | +30.43% | +2.79% |
| 2005 | +12.64% | -14.29% |
| 2004 | +51.46% | -23.55% |
| 2003 | +54.68% | +77.44% |
| 2002 | +24.65% | +28.53% |
| 2001 | +55.36% | +45.88% |
| 2000 | +4.10% | +42.77% |
| 1999 | +4.40% | -13.74% |
MAC vs FLG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MAC was -93.28%, occurring on Mar 27, 2009. Recovery took 1566 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FLG was -80.10%, occurring on Apr 30, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current MAC drawdown is -58.35%. The current FLG drawdown is -66.49%.
| Rank | MAC | FLG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -93.28% Feb 7, 2007 - Apr 29, 2013 | -80.10% Jul 31, 2023 - Apr 30, 2024 |
| #2 | -92.92% Aug 1, 2016 - Apr 2, 2020 | -69.83% Feb 27, 2004 - May 4, 2015 |
| #3 | -26.80% Apr 1, 2004 - Aug 27, 2004 | -49.93% Oct 19, 2021 - Jul 27, 2023 |
| #4 | -23.77% Aug 1, 2000 - May 4, 2001 | -45.61% Oct 28, 2015 - Oct 7, 2021 |
| #5 | -22.33% Mar 16, 2015 - Jul 13, 2016 | -44.68% Nov 10, 1999 - Dec 4, 2000 |
| #6 | -21.21% May 20, 2013 - Jul 18, 2014 | -39.04% Aug 16, 2001 - Aug 8, 2002 |
| #7 | -18.69% Jan 20, 2000 - May 1, 2000 | -21.36% Aug 19, 2002 - Apr 10, 2003 |
| #8 | -16.70% Dec 17, 2004 - May 20, 2005 | -11.33% Jul 31, 2015 - Oct 23, 2015 |
| #9 | -14.68% Aug 22, 2001 - Nov 15, 2001 | -11.20% Jul 14, 2003 - Sep 23, 2003 |
| #10 | -14.03% Jun 28, 2002 - Aug 26, 2002 | -10.25% Feb 13, 2001 - Mar 28, 2001 |
| #11 | -13.59% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 5, 2006 | -10.16% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 29, 2001 |
| #12 | -12.53% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 28, 1999 | -6.06% Dec 2, 2003 - Jan 14, 2004 |
| #13 | -11.31% Sep 26, 2002 - Dec 5, 2002 | -6.00% Jun 12, 2003 - Jun 27, 2003 |
| #14 | -10.58% Apr 12, 2002 - Jun 27, 2002 | -5.09% Sep 23, 2003 - Oct 16, 2003 |
| #15 | -8.74% Mar 29, 2006 - Aug 30, 2006 | -4.69% Nov 7, 2003 - Nov 25, 2003 |
Correlation
Correlation between MAC and FLG is 0.50 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MAC vs FLG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MAC | FLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.77% | 0.08% |
| 2025 | 3.68% | 0.32% |
| 2024 | 3.41% | 2.14% |
| 2023 | 4.41% | 6.65% |
| 2022 | 5.51% | 7.91% |
| 2021 | 3.47% | 5.57% |
| 2020 | 10.78% | 6.45% |
| 2019 | 11.14% | 5.66% |
| 2018 | 6.86% | 7.23% |
| 2017 | 4.37% | 5.22% |
| 2016 | 3.88% | 4.27% |
| 2015 | 5.74% | 6.13% |
| 2014 | 3.01% | 6.25% |
| 2013 | 4.01% | 5.93% |
| 2012 | 3.83% | 7.63% |
| 2011 | 4.05% | 8.08% |
| 2010 | 4.43% | 5.31% |
| 2009 | 7.23% | 6.89% |
| 2008 | 17.62% | 8.36% |
| 2007 | 4.12% | 5.69% |
| 2006 | 3.18% | 6.21% |
| 2005 | 3.92% | 6.05% |
| 2004 | 3.95% | 4.67% |
| 2003 | 5.21% | 2.31% |
| 2002 | 7.22% | 2.63% |
| 2001 | 8.05% | 2.35% |
| 2000 | 10.73% | 2.72% |
| 1999 | 2.45% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks