MAC vs CLF
Comparison between Macerich Company (MAC, Company) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company).
MAC is from the Real Estate sector, while CLF is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceMAC has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +12.8% compared to -14.0%
MAC vs CLF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MAC vs CLF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MAC vs CLF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MAC | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +35.20% | -10.66% |
| 2025 | -5.20% | +39.20% |
| 2024 | +33.42% | -52.45% |
| 2023 | +46.90% | +21.62% |
| 2022 | -32.38% | -25.86% |
| 2021 | +68.64% | +50.97% |
| 2020 | -55.04% | +88.69% |
| 2019 | -31.47% | +10.16% |
| 2018 | -31.52% | -2.66% |
| 2017 | -3.05% | -16.26% |
| 2016 | -7.54% | +403.59% |
| 2015 | +1.57% | -77.52% |
| 2014 | +48.48% | -71.27% |
| 2013 | +4.11% | -30.80% |
| 2012 | +18.93% | -38.56% |
| 2011 | +9.66% | -23.00% |
| 2010 | +43.61% | +63.25% |
| 2009 | +125.69% | +57.60% |
| 2008 | -72.27% | -46.54% |
| 2007 | -15.53% | +112.27% |
| 2006 | +30.43% | +5.86% |
| 2005 | +12.64% | +76.79% |
| 2004 | +51.46% | +95.85% |
| 2003 | +54.68% | +147.09% |
| 2002 | +24.65% | +7.53% |
| 2001 | +55.36% | -14.70% |
| 2000 | +4.10% | -24.00% |
| 1999 | +4.40% | +8.53% |
MAC vs CLF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MAC was -93.28%, occurring on Mar 27, 2009. Recovery took 1566 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current MAC drawdown is -52.90%. The current CLF drawdown is -87.57%.
| Rank | MAC | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -93.28% Feb 7, 2007 - Apr 29, 2013 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 |
| #2 | -92.92% Aug 1, 2016 - Apr 2, 2020 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 |
| #3 | -26.80% Apr 1, 2004 - Aug 27, 2004 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 |
| #4 | -23.77% Aug 1, 2000 - May 4, 2001 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 |
| #5 | -22.33% Mar 16, 2015 - Jul 13, 2016 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 |
| #6 | -21.21% May 20, 2013 - Jul 18, 2014 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 |
| #7 | -18.69% Jan 20, 2000 - May 1, 2000 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #8 | -16.70% Dec 17, 2004 - May 20, 2005 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 |
| #9 | -14.68% Aug 22, 2001 - Nov 15, 2001 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 |
| #10 | -14.03% Jun 28, 2002 - Aug 26, 2002 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 |
| #11 | -13.59% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 5, 2006 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 |
| #12 | -12.53% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 28, 1999 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 |
| #13 | -11.31% Sep 26, 2002 - Dec 5, 2002 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 |
| #14 | -10.58% Apr 12, 2002 - Jun 27, 2002 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 |
| #15 | -8.74% Mar 29, 2006 - Aug 30, 2006 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between MAC and CLF is 0.09 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MAC vs CLF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MAC | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 3.68% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 3.41% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 4.41% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 5.51% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 3.47% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 10.78% | 0.82% |
| 2019 | 11.14% | 3.10% |
| 2018 | 6.86% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 4.37% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 3.88% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 5.74% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 3.01% | 8.40% |
| 2013 | 4.01% | 2.29% |
| 2012 | 3.83% | 5.59% |
| 2011 | 4.05% | 1.35% |
| 2010 | 4.43% | 0.65% |
| 2009 | 7.23% | 0.55% |
| 2008 | 17.62% | 1.37% |
| 2007 | 4.12% | 0.50% |
| 2006 | 3.18% | 0.98% |
| 2005 | 3.92% | 0.68% |
| 2004 | 3.95% | 0.19% |
| 2003 | 5.21% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 7.22% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 8.05% | 2.19% |
| 2000 | 10.73% | 6.96% |
| 1999 | 2.45% | 1.21% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks