LW vs M
Comparison between Lamb Weston Holdings Inc (LW, Company) and Macy`s Inc (M, Company).
LW is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while M is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceM has outperformed LW, delivering a return of +8.6% compared to -8.9%
LW vs M - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LW vs M - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LW vs M - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LW | M |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +10.45% | +4.15% |
| 2025 | -34.91% | +39.70% |
| 2024 | -36.11% | -10.88% |
| 2023 | +25.27% | +4.24% |
| 2022 | +41.71% | -22.25% |
| 2021 | -15.08% | +136.37% |
| 2020 | -5.08% | -28.42% |
| 2019 | +18.12% | -40.21% |
| 2018 | +34.39% | +18.46% |
| 2017 | +53.23% | -23.99% |
| 2016 | +24.79% | +4.14% |
| 2015 | N/A | -45.34% |
| 2014 | N/A | +25.63% |
| 2013 | N/A | +42.26% |
| 2012 | N/A | +21.93% |
| 2011 | N/A | +28.15% |
| 2010 | N/A | +49.66% |
| 2009 | N/A | +55.19% |
| 2008 | N/A | -57.15% |
| 2007 | N/A | -29.97% |
| 2006 | N/A | +13.31% |
| 2005 | N/A | +16.60% |
| 2004 | N/A | +26.62% |
| 2003 | N/A | +58.78% |
| 2002 | N/A | -28.92% |
| 2001 | N/A | +18.96% |
| 2000 | N/A | -30.53% |
| 1999 | N/A | +18.60% |
LW vs M Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LW was -64.56%, occurring on Apr 1, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for M was -91.86%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current LW drawdown is -57.34%. The current M drawdown is -48.24%.
| Rank | LW | M |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.56% Jul 3, 2023 - Apr 1, 2026 | -91.86% Jul 16, 2015 - Apr 1, 2020 |
| #2 | -53.05% Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 5, 2023 | -87.41% Mar 23, 2007 - Mar 12, 2013 |
| #3 | -28.84% Nov 13, 2018 - Nov 15, 2019 | -55.14% Jan 10, 2000 - Feb 25, 2004 |
| #4 | -10.99% Jan 23, 2018 - Apr 5, 2018 | -24.68% Aug 1, 2005 - Apr 5, 2006 |
| #5 | -10.11% Aug 6, 2018 - Oct 4, 2018 | -21.47% Apr 5, 2004 - Nov 15, 2004 |
| #6 | -9.79% Jun 2, 2017 - Oct 2, 2017 | -17.66% Oct 26, 2006 - Mar 8, 2007 |
| #7 | -6.40% Dec 12, 2016 - Dec 23, 2016 | -15.52% May 8, 2006 - Sep 8, 2006 |
| #8 | -6.29% May 10, 2018 - Jun 25, 2018 | -15.43% Jul 9, 2013 - Nov 13, 2013 |
| #9 | -5.86% Mar 2, 2023 - Mar 29, 2023 | -11.68% Aug 26, 2014 - Nov 20, 2014 |
| #10 | -4.84% May 19, 2023 - Jun 13, 2023 | -11.20% Apr 5, 2005 - May 16, 2005 |
| #11 | -4.77% Apr 6, 2017 - May 16, 2017 | -9.91% Mar 4, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004 |
| #12 | -4.35% Jan 17, 2023 - Feb 15, 2023 | -9.46% Jan 17, 2014 - Feb 25, 2014 |
| #13 | -3.68% Apr 27, 2018 - May 8, 2018 | -9.43% Apr 8, 2015 - Jun 12, 2015 |
| #14 | -3.54% Jul 13, 2018 - Aug 3, 2018 | -9.14% Apr 2, 2014 - Aug 21, 2014 |
| #15 | -3.52% Dec 30, 2016 - Feb 1, 2017 | -8.42% Jan 8, 2015 - Apr 2, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between LW and M is -0.20 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
LW vs M dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LW | M |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.66% | 1.65% |
| 2025 | 3.53% | 3.31% |
| 2024 | 2.15% | 4.10% |
| 2023 | 1.04% | 3.29% |
| 2022 | 1.10% | 3.05% |
| 2021 | 1.48% | 1.15% |
| 2020 | 1.17% | 3.36% |
| 2019 | 0.93% | 8.88% |
| 2018 | 1.04% | 5.07% |
| 2017 | 1.33% | 5.99% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 4.17% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 3.98% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.81% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.78% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 2.05% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.79% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.19% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 5.10% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.33% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.16% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.80% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks