StockComparison Logo
vs

LVS vs CHT

Comparison between Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS, Company) and Chunghwa Telecom (CHT, Company).

LVS is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while CHT is from the Communication Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCHT has outperformed LVS, delivering a return of +4.3% compared to +3.7%

LVS vs CHT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
LVS
$31B
Winner
CHT
$32B
Max Drawdown
LVS
99.02%
Winner
CHT
48.20%
Sharpe Ratio
LVS
-0.24
Winner
CHT
-0.22
5Y Beta
LVS
0.92
Winner
CHT
0.17
Industry
LVS
Resorts & Casinos
CHT
Telecom Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
LVS
18.73
CHT
26.70
Forward P/E
Winner
LVS
15.58
CHT
26.53
PEG Ratio
Winner
LVS
0.63
CHT
6.00
Dividend Yield
LVS
2.45%
Winner
CHT
3.88%
5Y EPS CAGR
LVS
N/A
CHT
0.68%
Debt to Equity
Winner
LVS
0.00%
CHT
10.03%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
LVS
8.59%
CHT
5.03%
P/S Ratio
LVS
2.29
Winner
CHT
0.14
P/B Ratio
LVS
55.03
Winner
CHT
2.74

LVS vs CHT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
LVS
-0.93%
CHT
-0.98%
3M
LVS
-11.69%
Winner
CHT
+1.32%
6M
LVS
-18.06%
Winner
CHT
+5.50%
1Y
LVS
-10.25%
Winner
CHT
-3.05%
5Y(CAGR)
LVS
+3.69%
Winner
CHT
+4.32%
10Y(CAGR)
LVS
+1.68%
Winner
CHT
+5.46%
Max(CAGR)
LVS
+2.11%
Winner
CHT
+10.18%

LVS vs CHT - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearLVSCHT
2026-28.45%+4.64%
2025+33.24%+15.49%
2024+1.80%+0.63%
2023+0.51%+9.01%
2022+23.73%-9.52%
2021-35.05%+12.87%
2020-14.19%+8.87%
2019+34.00%+9.33%
2018-21.12%+3.67%
2017+36.42%+15.98%
2016+30.05%+10.57%
2015-17.88%+6.34%
2014-24.69%-0.47%
2013+65.48%+0.10%
2012+12.57%+7.65%
2011-6.27%+38.86%
2010+176.47%+43.01%
2009+110.72%+34.35%
2008-94.09%-14.41%
2007+12.01%+2.08%
2006+131.33%+11.40%
2005-18.64%-6.57%
2004+3.09%+59.36%
2003N/A-2.62%

LVS vs CHT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LVS was -99.02%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CHT was -44.43%, occurring on Oct 24, 2008. Recovery took 595 trading sessions.

The current LVS drawdown is -49.40%. The current CHT drawdown is -5.60%.

RankLVSCHT
#1-99.02%
Oct 2, 2007 - Mar 9, 2009
-44.43%
Mar 24, 2008 - Aug 2, 2010
#2-43.98%
Dec 17, 2004 - Feb 16, 2006
-25.11%
May 8, 2006 - Feb 20, 2008
#3-32.93%
Jan 16, 2007 - Sep 11, 2007
-23.72%
Feb 23, 2022 - Sep 26, 2024
#4-23.70%
Jun 30, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006
-19.37%
Aug 3, 2005 - May 2, 2006
#5-15.73%
May 5, 2006 - Jun 29, 2006
-18.37%
Jul 20, 2011 - Jul 11, 2013
#6-11.76%
Mar 6, 2006 - Mar 30, 2006
-16.10%
Aug 11, 2016 - Jan 2, 2018
#7-8.61%
Dec 4, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007
-12.38%
Apr 19, 2004 - Jul 9, 2004
#8-6.20%
Apr 17, 2006 - May 4, 2006
-12.26%
Oct 30, 2003 - Jan 28, 2004
#9-4.50%
Sep 25, 2007 - Oct 2, 2007
-11.57%
Feb 25, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005
#10-4.38%
Feb 23, 2006 - Mar 6, 2006
-11.03%
Aug 19, 2025 - Jun 11, 2026
#11-3.20%
Nov 14, 2006 - Nov 24, 2006
-10.59%
Jul 22, 2013 - Aug 22, 2014
#12-3.03%
Mar 30, 2006 - Apr 4, 2006
-9.47%
Apr 10, 2018 - Oct 4, 2019
#13-2.82%
Sep 18, 2007 - Sep 24, 2007
-9.39%
Sep 26, 2024 - May 2, 2025
#14-2.60%
Nov 27, 2006 - Dec 4, 2006
-8.68%
Mar 18, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004
#15-2.49%
Apr 7, 2006 - Apr 12, 2006
-7.76%
Aug 28, 2014 - Feb 27, 2015

Correlation

Correlation between LVS and CHT is 0.45 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.45
-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

LVS vs CHT dividend yield comparison.

YearLVSCHT
20261.96%3.93%
20251.54%4.00%
20241.56%3.91%
20230.81%3.91%
20220.00%4.35%
20210.00%3.67%
20201.33%3.67%
20194.46%3.91%
20185.76%4.44%
20174.20%3.64%
20165.39%4.32%
20155.93%3.88%
20143.44%4.51%
20131.78%4.68%
20128.12%8.89%
20110.00%5.74%
20100.00%4.97%
20090.00%4.89%
20080.00%6.49%
20070.00%5.78%
20060.00%5.32%
20050.00%6.34%
20040.00%10.10%

Select Stocks to Compare