LULU vs IESC

Comparison between Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU, Company) and IES Holdings Inc (IESC, Company).

LULU is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while IESC is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceIESC has outperformed LULU, delivering a return of +68.5% compared to -17.6%

LULU vs IESC - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	LULU(COMPANY)	IESC(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$14B	$14B
Max Drawdown	92.26%	96.92%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.88	1.77
5Y Beta	1.17	2.13
Industry	Apparel Retail	Engineering & Construction
P/E Ratio	8.67	35.69
Forward P/E	10.47	208.33
PEG Ratio	0.63	0.70
5Y EPS CAGR	24.33%	50.20%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	3.26%
Free Cash Flow Yield	6.83%	2.63%
P/S Ratio	1.28	3.76
P/B Ratio	3.06	12.38

Market Cap

LULU

$14B

Winner

IESC

$14B

Max Drawdown

Winner

LULU

92.26%

IESC

96.92%

Sharpe Ratio

LULU

-1.88

Winner

IESC

1.77

5Y Beta

Winner

LULU

1.17

IESC

2.13

Industry

LULU

Apparel Retail

IESC

Engineering & Construction

P/E Ratio

Winner

LULU

8.67

IESC

35.69

Forward P/E

Winner

LULU

10.47

IESC

208.33

PEG Ratio

Winner

LULU

0.63

IESC

0.70

5Y EPS CAGR

LULU

24.33%

Winner

IESC

50.20%

Debt to Equity

Winner

LULU

0.00%

IESC

3.26%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

LULU

6.83%

IESC

2.63%

P/S Ratio

Winner

LULU

1.28

IESC

3.76

P/B Ratio

Winner

LULU

3.06

IESC

12.38

LULU vs IESC - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	LULU	IESC
1 month	-26.79%	+28.91%
3 months	-32.47%	+31.66%
6 months	-30.20%	+87.05%
1 year	-62.65%	+159.60%
5 years(CAGR)	-17.65%	+68.55%
10 years(CAGR)	+6.97%	+48.54%
Max(CAGR)	+12.06%	+16.88%

LULU

-26.79%

Winner

IESC

+28.91%

LULU

-32.47%

Winner

IESC

+31.66%

LULU

-30.20%

Winner

IESC

+87.05%

LULU

-62.65%

Winner

IESC

+159.60%

5Y(CAGR)

LULU

-17.65%

Winner

IESC

+68.55%

10Y(CAGR)

LULU

+6.97%

Winner

IESC

+48.54%

Max(CAGR)

LULU

+12.06%

Winner

IESC

+16.88%

LULU vs IESC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	LULU	IESC
2026	-43.48%	+67.65%
2025	-44.18%	+85.52%
2024	-24.33%	+159.50%
2023	+58.11%	+118.36%
2022	-17.33%	-32.17%
2021	+9.83%	+11.91%
2020	+49.10%	+83.21%
2019	+87.82%	+60.78%
2018	+52.60%	-8.80%
2017	+17.56%	-12.66%
2016	+16.34%	+66.67%
2015	-5.19%	+45.09%
2014	-4.78%	+40.55%
2013	-20.25%	+19.78%
2012	+62.09%	+143.24%
2011	+30.37%	-47.89%
2010	+121.35%	-40.64%
2009	+286.39%	-49.91%
2008	-82.31%	-51.95%
2007	+69.18%	+3.70%
2006	N/A	+4292.59%
2005	N/A	-91.06%
2004	N/A	-48.12%
2003	N/A	+134.18%
2002	N/A	-31.25%
2001	N/A	-12.93%
2000	N/A	-39.08%
1999	N/A	-7.54%

LULU vs IESC Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LULU was -92.26%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 790 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for IESC was -96.92%, occurring on Nov 10, 2005. Recovery took 1635 trading sessions.

The current LULU drawdown is -76.70%. The current IESC drawdown is -2.15%.

Rank	LULU	IESC
#1	-92.26% Oct 22, 2007 - Dec 9, 2010	-96.92% Nov 10, 1999 - May 15, 2006
#2	-76.70% Dec 29, 2023 - May 15, 2026	-94.89% Jul 9, 2007 - Oct 6, 2020
#3	-54.73% Jun 10, 2013 - Feb 26, 2018	-54.28% Jun 8, 2021 - Jun 28, 2023
#4	-47.29% Feb 20, 2020 - May 21, 2020	-51.36% May 16, 2006 - Feb 22, 2007
#5	-46.12% Nov 16, 2021 - Dec 8, 2023	-49.23% Jan 22, 2025 - Jul 16, 2025
#6	-33.56% May 3, 2012 - May 10, 2013	-35.14% Nov 29, 2024 - Jan 22, 2025
#7	-31.60% Jul 20, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012	-31.40% May 10, 2024 - Aug 23, 2024
#8	-30.30% Sep 28, 2018 - Mar 28, 2019	-24.65% Aug 23, 2024 - Sep 26, 2024
#9	-28.41% Sep 2, 2020 - Jul 23, 2021	-21.80% Dec 11, 2025 - Feb 9, 2026
#10	-18.67% Apr 21, 2011 - Jun 21, 2011	-20.27% Sep 1, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023
#11	-15.15% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007	-18.09% Oct 24, 2025 - Dec 8, 2025
#12	-12.58% Feb 11, 2011 - Mar 28, 2011	-18.02% Feb 20, 2026 - Apr 8, 2026
#13	-11.93% Oct 10, 2007 - Oct 16, 2007	-17.35% Oct 20, 2020 - Nov 13, 2020
#14	-11.10% Sep 24, 2021 - Oct 26, 2021	-13.78% Apr 8, 2024 - Apr 29, 2024
#15	-10.57% Jun 3, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020	-12.64% Feb 8, 2021 - Mar 5, 2021