LQDT vs AOSL

Comparison between Liquidity Services Inc (LQDT, Company) and Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd (AOSL, Company).

LQDT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while AOSL is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceLQDT has outperformed AOSL, delivering a return of +12.6% compared to +11.5%

LQDT vs AOSL - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	LQDT(COMPANY)	AOSL(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.44B	$1.44B
Max Drawdown	95.31%	75.27%
Sharpe Ratio	1.45	1.25
5Y Beta	0.77	2.80
Industry	Internet Retail	Semiconductors
P/E Ratio	46.96	-13.54
Forward P/E	23.53	8.26
PEG Ratio	2.65	-0.04
5Y EPS CAGR	12.50%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.55%
Free Cash Flow Yield	5.42%	-4.20%

Market Cap

LQDT

$1.44B

Winner

AOSL

$1.44B

Max Drawdown

LQDT

95.31%

Winner

AOSL

75.27%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

LQDT

1.45

AOSL

1.25

5Y Beta

Winner

LQDT

0.77

AOSL

2.80

Industry

LQDT

Internet Retail

AOSL

Semiconductors

P/E Ratio

LQDT

46.96

Winner

AOSL

-13.54

Forward P/E

LQDT

23.53

Winner

AOSL

8.26

PEG Ratio

LQDT

2.65

Winner

AOSL

-0.04

5Y EPS CAGR

LQDT

12.50%

AOSL

N/A

Debt to Equity

Winner

LQDT

0.00%

AOSL

0.55%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

LQDT

5.42%

AOSL

-4.20%

LQDT vs AOSL - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	LQDT	AOSL
1 month	+11.84%	+24.67%
3 months	+34.79%	+127.35%
6 months	+19.45%	+139.00%
1 year	+62.48%	+96.89%
5 years(CAGR)	+12.56%	+11.54%
10 years(CAGR)	+18.03%	+12.98%
Max(CAGR)	+5.89%	+6.38%

LQDT

+11.84%

Winner

AOSL

+24.67%

LQDT

+34.79%

Winner

AOSL

+127.35%

LQDT

+19.45%

Winner

AOSL

+139.00%

LQDT

+62.48%

Winner

AOSL

+96.89%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

LQDT

+12.56%

AOSL

+11.54%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

LQDT

+18.03%

AOSL

+12.98%

Max(CAGR)

LQDT

+5.89%

Winner

AOSL

+6.38%

LQDT vs AOSL - Annual Returns (2006 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	LQDT	AOSL
2026	+28.05%	+132.53%
2025	-5.16%	-45.79%
2024	+88.50%	+35.24%
2023	+21.97%	-11.12%
2022	-36.75%	-54.07%
2021	+35.79%	+147.28%
2020	+174.31%	+72.81%
2019	-7.88%	+29.22%
2018	+31.28%	-39.49%
2017	-50.76%	-24.29%
2016	+49.08%	+141.43%
2015	-18.34%	+3.96%
2014	-63.62%	+16.75%
2013	-45.66%	-14.24%
2012	+8.96%	+4.87%
2011	+155.19%	-44.79%
2010	+38.42%	-27.51%
2009	+18.47%	N/A
2008	-33.84%	N/A
2007	-26.95%	N/A
2006	+45.23%	N/A

LQDT vs AOSL Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LQDT was -95.31%, occurring on Mar 27, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for AOSL was -75.27%, occurring on Apr 21, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current LQDT drawdown is -41.94%. The current AOSL drawdown is -26.90%.

Rank	LQDT	AOSL
#1	-95.31% May 9, 2012 - Mar 27, 2020	-75.27% Mar 24, 2022 - Apr 21, 2025
#2	-79.68% Feb 12, 2007 - Jun 23, 2011	-74.90% Nov 28, 2016 - Nov 23, 2020
#3	-53.04% May 31, 2006 - Nov 13, 2006	-61.86% Apr 30, 2010 - Aug 11, 2016
#4	-27.94% Aug 3, 2011 - Sep 1, 2011	-39.56% Feb 12, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021
#5	-20.38% Nov 20, 2006 - Feb 8, 2007	-34.85% Jan 3, 2022 - Mar 22, 2022
#6	-19.83% Sep 28, 2011 - Dec 6, 2011	-20.10% Sep 8, 2016 - Nov 28, 2016
#7	-15.03% May 5, 2006 - May 26, 2006	-19.50% Dec 7, 2020 - Jan 7, 2021
#8	-14.41% Jan 10, 2012 - Feb 13, 2012	-12.80% Jan 22, 2021 - Feb 1, 2021
#9	-12.97% Sep 16, 2011 - Sep 28, 2011	-10.54% Dec 7, 2021 - Dec 23, 2021
#10	-8.67% Sep 6, 2011 - Sep 15, 2011	-7.53% Nov 22, 2021 - Nov 30, 2021
#11	-8.65% Mar 24, 2006 - Apr 19, 2006	-7.09% Dec 2, 2021 - Dec 7, 2021
#12	-7.57% Mar 26, 2012 - Apr 5, 2012	-6.68% Jan 12, 2021 - Jan 21, 2021
#13	-6.75% Dec 16, 2011 - Jan 10, 2012	-5.81% Feb 4, 2021 - Feb 11, 2021
#14	-6.64% Jul 20, 2011 - Aug 2, 2011	-4.90% Mar 22, 2022 - Mar 24, 2022
#15	-6.55% Feb 27, 2012 - Mar 9, 2012	-4.42% Dec 27, 2021 - Dec 29, 2021