StockComparison Logo
vs

LNT vs CTSH

Comparison between Alliant Energy Corp (LNT, Company) and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company).

LNT is from the Utilities sector, while CTSH is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceLNT has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +9.4% compared to -9.6%

LNT vs CTSH - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
LNT
$20B
Winner
CTSH
$20B
Max Drawdown
Winner
LNT
58.43%
CTSH
71.38%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
LNT
1.37
CTSH
-1.68
5Y Beta
Winner
LNT
0.14
CTSH
0.75
Industry
LNT
Utilities - Regulated Electric
CTSH
Information Technology Services
P/E Ratio
LNT
23.70
Winner
CTSH
8.94
Forward P/E
LNT
21.93
Winner
CTSH
7.26
PEG Ratio
LNT
2.39
CTSH
N/A
Dividend Yield
LNT
2.81%
Winner
CTSH
3.13%
5Y Dividends CAGR
LNT
10.62%
Winner
CTSH
12.05%
5Y EPS CAGR
LNT
4.98%
Winner
CTSH
10.11%
Debt to Equity
LNT
148.30%
Winner
CTSH
3.77%
Free Cash Flow Yield
LNT
-7.55%
Winner
CTSH
12.57%

LNT vs CTSH - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
LNT
+3.41%
CTSH
-24.44%
3M
Winner
LNT
+10.00%
CTSH
-34.10%
6M
Winner
LNT
+18.21%
CTSH
-53.65%
1Y
Winner
LNT
+30.74%
CTSH
-48.11%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
LNT
+9.39%
CTSH
-9.62%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
LNT
+10.24%
CTSH
-2.58%
Max(CAGR)
LNT
+10.99%
Winner
CTSH
+15.07%

LNT vs CTSH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearLNTCTSH
2026+17.96%-51.28%
2025+14.75%+10.38%
2024+18.16%+5.04%
2023-4.12%+33.43%
2022-6.56%-35.16%
2021+25.37%+13.13%
2020-1.20%+34.18%
2019+36.97%-0.47%
2018+3.57%-9.57%
2017+15.92%+26.47%
2016+25.78%-3.61%
2015-2.74%+13.95%
2014+35.56%+6.56%
2013+18.62%+32.62%
2012+3.98%+12.42%
2011+23.95%-14.66%
2010+26.88%+56.60%
2009+7.94%+137.08%
2008-24.47%-43.97%
2007+10.97%-12.71%
2006+37.17%+52.28%
2005+3.68%+20.18%
2004+19.82%+79.90%
2003+54.50%+89.51%
2002-40.82%+88.30%
2001+4.65%+23.70%
2000+27.20%-24.36%
1999-1.11%+114.82%

LNT vs CTSH Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LNT was -51.65%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 958 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.

The current CTSH drawdown is -55.64%.

RankLNTCTSH
#1-51.65%
Apr 25, 2007 - Feb 10, 2011
-71.38%
Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002
#2-50.02%
Oct 3, 2001 - Jul 19, 2004
-69.06%
Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010
#3-33.54%
Feb 18, 2020 - May 21, 2021
-55.64%
Feb 14, 2025 - Jun 25, 2026
#4-25.62%
Aug 17, 2022 - Sep 16, 2024
-49.77%
Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021
#5-22.38%
Jan 24, 2000 - Feb 9, 2001
-43.77%
Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025
#6-21.03%
Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 8, 2016
-35.68%
Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000
#7-17.13%
Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 21, 2011
-34.31%
Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013
#8-17.09%
Nov 14, 2017 - Oct 8, 2018
-31.60%
Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017
#9-15.39%
Apr 6, 2022 - Aug 17, 2022
-30.65%
Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003
#10-13.98%
Sep 6, 2005 - Feb 2, 2006
-28.10%
Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004
#11-13.89%
Feb 26, 2001 - Oct 3, 2001
-25.36%
Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000
#12-12.15%
Jul 5, 2016 - Mar 24, 2017
-19.21%
Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014
#13-12.09%
Aug 20, 2021 - Mar 25, 2022
-18.87%
May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021
#14-11.59%
Apr 30, 2013 - Jul 18, 2013
-17.85%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005
#15-11.08%
Dec 11, 2018 - Mar 4, 2019
-17.00%
Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between LNT and CTSH is 0.90 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.90
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

LNT vs CTSH dividend yield comparison.

YearLNTCTSH
20261.40%1.69%
20253.12%1.49%
20243.25%1.56%
20233.53%1.54%
20223.10%1.89%
20212.62%1.08%
20202.95%1.07%
20192.60%1.29%
20183.17%1.26%
20172.96%0.63%
20163.10%0.00%
20153.52%0.00%
20143.07%0.00%
20133.64%0.00%
20123.07%0.00%
20113.85%0.00%
20104.30%0.00%
20094.96%0.00%
20084.80%0.00%
20073.12%0.00%
20063.05%0.00%
20053.75%0.00%
20043.54%0.00%
20034.02%0.00%
200212.08%0.00%
20016.59%0.00%
20006.27%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare