LKFN vs TRS
Comparison between Lakeland Financial Corp (LKFN, Company) and Trimas Corporation (TRS, Company).
LKFN is from the Financial Services sector, while TRS is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceTRS has outperformed LKFN, delivering a return of +7.9% compared to +4.0%
LKFN vs TRS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LKFN vs TRS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LKFN vs TRS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LKFN | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +11.24% | +14.11% |
| 2025 | -12.44% | +49.59% |
| 2024 | +9.01% | -3.73% |
| 2023 | -7.13% | -8.99% |
| 2022 | -5.68% | -24.34% |
| 2021 | +51.91% | +19.30% |
| 2020 | +12.29% | +1.67% |
| 2019 | +23.17% | +17.77% |
| 2018 | -15.08% | +1.07% |
| 2017 | +4.62% | +12.87% |
| 2016 | +60.34% | +29.19% |
| 2015 | +11.37% | -25.35% |
| 2014 | +15.53% | -19.69% |
| 2013 | +48.63% | +37.74% |
| 2012 | +2.38% | +51.97% |
| 2011 | +16.96% | -12.91% |
| 2010 | +26.13% | +184.56% |
| 2009 | -22.51% | +394.16% |
| 2008 | +22.29% | -86.30% |
| 2007 | -16.86% | -9.87% |
| 2006 | +26.70% | N/A |
| 2005 | +3.56% | N/A |
| 2004 | +11.98% | N/A |
| 2003 | +53.66% | N/A |
| 2002 | +34.99% | N/A |
| 2001 | +46.52% | N/A |
| 2000 | -14.01% | N/A |
| 1999 | -12.78% | N/A |
LKFN vs TRS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LKFN was -47.35%, occurring on May 16, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TRS was -93.99%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 752 trading sessions.
The current LKFN drawdown is -16.96%. The current TRS drawdown is -8.22%.
| Rank | LKFN | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -47.35% Jan 14, 2022 - May 16, 2023 | -93.99% Oct 23, 2007 - Oct 18, 2010 |
| #2 | -43.62% Sep 18, 2008 - Jul 7, 2011 | -54.97% Oct 23, 2013 - Jan 12, 2021 |
| #3 | -38.86% Jan 25, 2000 - Aug 9, 2001 | -48.32% Jul 7, 2011 - Dec 10, 2012 |
| #4 | -34.70% Dec 20, 2019 - Aug 7, 2020 | -47.20% Nov 12, 2021 - Aug 21, 2025 |
| #5 | -27.94% Dec 27, 2006 - Sep 18, 2008 | -22.24% Sep 18, 2025 - May 5, 2026 |
| #6 | -25.68% Mar 10, 2021 - Oct 18, 2021 | -22.09% Dec 13, 2010 - Apr 20, 2011 |
| #7 | -24.74% Jan 26, 2004 - Nov 17, 2004 | -21.90% Feb 23, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021 |
| #8 | -24.21% Nov 29, 2017 - Dec 20, 2019 | -19.54% Apr 25, 2011 - Jun 30, 2011 |
| #9 | -21.03% Aug 10, 2020 - Oct 26, 2020 | -14.14% Mar 28, 2013 - May 20, 2013 |
| #10 | -20.93% Jul 9, 2002 - Jun 5, 2003 | -13.58% Jul 5, 2013 - Oct 21, 2013 |
| #11 | -17.92% Nov 1, 1999 - Jan 25, 2000 | -12.22% May 8, 2026 - Jun 18, 2026 |
| #12 | -17.45% Dec 4, 2015 - May 18, 2016 | -9.88% Jun 5, 2007 - Sep 4, 2007 |
| #13 | -16.58% Jul 21, 2011 - Oct 27, 2011 | -9.58% Feb 14, 2013 - Mar 22, 2013 |
| #14 | -16.47% Sep 24, 2012 - May 17, 2013 | -8.30% Jan 22, 2021 - Feb 12, 2021 |
| #15 | -12.92% Dec 30, 2014 - Jun 22, 2015 | -8.22% Jun 30, 2026 - Jul 6, 2026 |
Correlation
Correlation between LKFN and TRS is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
LKFN vs TRS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LKFN | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.69% | 0.19% |
| 2025 | 3.51% | 0.45% |
| 2024 | 2.79% | 0.65% |
| 2023 | 2.82% | 0.63% |
| 2022 | 2.19% | 0.58% |
| 2021 | 1.70% | 0.11% |
| 2020 | 2.24% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.37% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 2.49% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.75% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.53% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.03% | 32.28% |
| 2014 | 1.89% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.46% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 3.23% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 2.40% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 2.89% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 3.59% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.54% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 2.61% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.92% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 2.23% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.07% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.09% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.82% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 3.29% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 4.00% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks