LIT vs FAS
Comparison between Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT, ETF) and DIREXION DAILY FINANCIAL BULL 3X SHARES (FAS, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceFAS has outperformed LIT, delivering a return of +4.6% compared to +3.3%
LIT vs FAS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LIT vs FAS - Holdings Comparison
LIT and FAS have 1 common holdings. Overlap is -4.62%
LIT's top 25 holdings weight is 94.55%. FAS's top 25 holdings weight is 86.94%.
| Rank | LIT | FAS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | RIO TINTO PLC ADR (RIO) - 20.59% | DREYFUS GOVT CASH MAN INS (n/a) - 21.29% |
| #2 | NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 5.49% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B (BRK-B) - 8.67% |
| #3 | ALBEMARLE CORP (ALB) - 5.48% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (JPM) - 8.09% |
| #4 | TDK CORP (n/a) - 5.47% | GOLDMAN SACHS FIN GOV 465 INSTITUT (n/a) - 5.53% |
| #5 | SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD (n/a) - 5.04% | VISA INC CLASS A (V) - 5.37% |
| #6 | PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP (n/a) - 4.62% | MASTERCARD INC CLASS A (MA) - 3.93% |
| #7 | TESLA INC (TSLA) - 4.28% | GOLDMAN FINL SQ TRSRY INST 506 (n/a) - 3.59% |
| #8 | PLS GROUP LTD (n/a) - 3.59% | DREYFUS TRSRY SECURITIES CASH MGMT (n/a) - 3.46% |
| #9 | CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 3.43% | BANK OF AMERICA CORP (BAC) - 3.39% |
| #10 | EVE ENERGY CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 3.35% | THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (GS) - 2.92% |
| #11 | LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD (n/a) - 3.35% | MORGAN STANLEY (MS) - 2.37% |
| #12 | BYD CO LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 3.18% | WELLS FARGO & CO (WFC) - 2.35% |
| #13 | GANFENG LITHIUM GROUP CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 3.13% | CITIGROUP INC (C) - 2.17% |
| #14 | SOCIEDAD QUIMICA Y MINERA DE CHILE SA ADR (SQM) - 3.05% | AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (AXP) - 1.63% |
| #15 | GUANGZHOU TINCI MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 2.57% | BLACKROCK INC (BLK) - 1.52% |
| #16 | TIANQI LITHIUM CORP CLASS A (n/a) - 2.52% | CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (SCHW) - 1.46% |
| #17 | ENERSYS (ENS) - 2.37% | S&P GLOBAL INC (SPGI) - 1.23% |
| #18 | MINERAL RESOURCES LTD (n/a) - 2.32% | CHUBB LTD (CB) - 1.16% |
| #19 | ECOPRO BM CO LTD ORDINARY SHARES (n/a) - 2.07% | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP (COF) - 1.14% |
| #20 | WUXI LEAD INTELLIGENT EQUIPMENT CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 2.01% | PROGRESSIVE CORP (PGR) - 1.14% |
| #21 | SINOMINE RESOURCE GROUP CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 1.56% | CME GROUP INC CLASS A (CME) - 1.00% |
| #22 | YUNNAN ENERGY NEW MATERIAL (GROUP) CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 1.48% | BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (BNY) - 0.95% |
| #23 | SUNWODA ELECTRONIC CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 1.23% | BLACKSTONE INC (BX) - 0.87% |
| #24 | IGO LTD (n/a) - 1.22% | PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC (PNC) - 0.87% |
| #25 | SHANGHAI PUTAILAI NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 1.15% | INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE INC (ICE) - 0.84% |
| Total Holdings | 43 | 82 |
LIT vs FAS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LIT vs FAS - Annual Returns (2008 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LIT | FAS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +18.15% | -18.94% |
| 2025 | +62.68% | +22.20% |
| 2024 | -18.14% | +82.86% |
| 2023 | -11.19% | +13.54% |
| 2022 | -31.14% | -44.79% |
| 2021 | +27.65% | +125.70% |
| 2020 | +124.89% | -36.19% |
| 2019 | +2.89% | +112.21% |
| 2018 | -30.27% | -33.41% |
| 2017 | +61.44% | +63.15% |
| 2016 | +25.33% | +49.22% |
| 2015 | -10.50% | -8.83% |
| 2014 | -12.26% | +42.99% |
| 2013 | -11.83% | +109.19% |
| 2012 | -0.45% | +73.17% |
| 2011 | -39.23% | -55.93% |
| 2010 | +43.01% | +7.53% |
| 2009 | N/A | -42.40% |
| 2008 | N/A | +21.68% |
LIT vs FAS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LIT was -65.93%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for FAS was -91.61%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 1268 trading sessions.
The current LIT drawdown is -15.63%. The current FAS drawdown is -25.04%.
| Rank | LIT | FAS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -65.93% Nov 8, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025 | -91.61% Dec 8, 2008 - Dec 20, 2013 |
| #2 | -61.91% Jan 3, 2011 - Oct 5, 2020 | -85.99% Feb 14, 2020 - Apr 28, 2021 |
| #3 | -25.78% Feb 16, 2021 - Jul 7, 2021 | -66.89% Jan 12, 2022 - Oct 16, 2024 |
| #4 | -9.57% Sep 15, 2021 - Oct 18, 2021 | -53.73% Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 24, 2019 |
| #5 | -9.57% Jan 7, 2021 - Feb 16, 2021 | -53.35% Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 14, 2016 |
| #6 | -8.43% Aug 5, 2010 - Sep 13, 2010 | -43.11% Feb 6, 2025 - Dec 22, 2025 |
| #7 | -8.20% Aug 12, 2021 - Sep 15, 2021 | -43.03% Nov 28, 2008 - Dec 8, 2008 |
| #8 | -7.32% Jul 12, 2021 - Jul 22, 2021 | -40.88% Jan 6, 2026 - Mar 27, 2026 |
| #9 | -6.96% Nov 8, 2010 - Dec 6, 2010 | -30.14% Nov 19, 2008 - Nov 24, 2008 |
| #10 | -6.02% Jul 22, 2021 - Jul 29, 2021 | -24.26% Jun 4, 2021 - Aug 11, 2021 |
| #11 | -4.01% Nov 24, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020 | -22.51% Nov 29, 2024 - Jan 30, 2025 |
| #12 | -3.65% Dec 8, 2020 - Dec 15, 2020 | -21.48% Nov 3, 2021 - Jan 7, 2022 |
| #13 | -3.64% Nov 9, 2020 - Nov 16, 2020 | -19.70% Jul 26, 2019 - Oct 30, 2019 |
| #14 | -3.01% Oct 12, 2020 - Oct 29, 2020 | -19.60% Jan 15, 2014 - Mar 6, 2014 |
| #15 | -2.58% Dec 28, 2020 - Dec 30, 2020 | -19.30% Sep 18, 2014 - Oct 31, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between LIT and FAS is 0.65 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2008 - 2026)
LIT vs FAS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LIT | FAS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| 2025 | 0.49% | 8.21% |
| 2024 | 0.93% | 0.76% |
| 2023 | 1.11% | 1.77% |
| 2022 | 0.99% | 0.91% |
| 2021 | 0.22% | 0.60% |
| 2020 | 0.40% | 0.47% |
| 2019 | 1.85% | 0.62% |
| 2018 | 2.52% | 1.43% |
| 2017 | 3.26% | 0.11% |
| 2016 | 2.15% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 0.24% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 1.07% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 0.32% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 2.42% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.13% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.16% | 0.35% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.40% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 0.18% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks