LEO vs TCPB
Comparison between BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO, ETF) and THRIVENT CORE PLUS BOND ETF (TCPB, ETF).
LEO vs TCPB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
Winner
LEO
$427M
TCPB
$425M
Expense Ratio
LEO
N/A
TCPB
0.39%
Max Drawdown
LEO
54.53%
Winner
TCPB
3.97%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
LEO
1.07
TCPB
0.35
5Y Beta
LEO
0.17
Winner
TCPB
0.05
5Y Dividends CAGR
LEO
-7.57%
TCPB
N/A
LEO vs TCPB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
LEO
+0.09%
TCPB
-0.06%
3M
Winner
LEO
+0.44%
TCPB
-0.85%
6M
Winner
LEO
+3.35%
TCPB
+0.40%
1Y
Winner
LEO
+14.63%
TCPB
+5.23%
5Y(CAGR)
LEO
-2.39%
TCPB
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
LEO
+1.13%
TCPB
N/A
Max(CAGR)
LEO
+4.81%
Winner
TCPB
+4.97%
LEO vs TCPB - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LEO | TCPB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.84% | +0.14% |
| 2025 | +8.40% | +6.29% |
| 2024 | +6.40% | N/A |
| 2023 | -1.05% | N/A |
| 2022 | -23.74% | N/A |
| 2021 | +5.05% | N/A |
| 2020 | +4.86% | N/A |
| 2019 | +22.72% | N/A |
| 2018 | -12.42% | N/A |
| 2017 | +8.83% | N/A |
| 2016 | +3.50% | N/A |
| 2015 | +11.03% | N/A |
| 2014 | +15.50% | N/A |
| 2013 | -16.60% | N/A |
| 2012 | +14.70% | N/A |
| 2011 | +23.10% | N/A |
| 2010 | +3.15% | N/A |
| 2009 | +46.92% | N/A |
| 2008 | -27.48% | N/A |
| 2007 | -7.07% | N/A |
| 2006 | +13.96% | N/A |
| 2005 | +7.55% | N/A |
| 2004 | -7.35% | N/A |
| 2003 | +10.84% | N/A |
| 2002 | +6.78% | N/A |
| 2001 | +22.11% | N/A |
LEO vs TCPB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LEO was -47.31%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 671 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TCPB was -2.74%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current LEO drawdown is -17.31%. The current TCPB drawdown is -1.61%.
| Rank | LEO | TCPB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -47.31% May 7, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010 | -2.74% Feb 27, 2026 - Mar 27, 2026 |
| #2 | -41.48% Aug 27, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023 | -2.63% Apr 4, 2025 - Jun 26, 2025 |
| #3 | -30.28% Feb 25, 2020 - Feb 5, 2021 | -1.20% Oct 27, 2025 - Jan 14, 2026 |
| #4 | -23.62% Jan 8, 2013 - Nov 3, 2015 | -1.15% Sep 16, 2025 - Oct 16, 2025 |
| #5 | -21.68% Jan 21, 2004 - Sep 7, 2005 | -1.07% Jun 30, 2025 - Jul 30, 2025 |
| #6 | -19.81% Sep 10, 2010 - Oct 12, 2011 | -0.92% Mar 3, 2025 - Apr 1, 2025 |
| #7 | -17.32% Aug 1, 2017 - Jul 2, 2019 | -0.72% Sep 11, 2025 - Sep 16, 2025 |
| #8 | -12.16% Jul 8, 2016 - Jul 11, 2017 | -0.65% Jul 30, 2025 - Aug 1, 2025 |
| #9 | -11.77% Oct 1, 2002 - Apr 29, 2003 | -0.62% Jan 14, 2026 - Feb 5, 2026 |
| #10 | -11.61% Jun 12, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004 | -0.46% Aug 13, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025 |
| #11 | -9.85% Aug 28, 2001 - Dec 31, 2001 | -0.29% Aug 28, 2025 - Sep 4, 2025 |
| #12 | -8.30% Sep 7, 2005 - Mar 29, 2006 | -0.26% Aug 5, 2025 - Aug 13, 2025 |
| #13 | -6.69% Mar 12, 2012 - May 9, 2012 | -0.19% Oct 22, 2025 - Oct 27, 2025 |
| #14 | -6.02% Nov 29, 2012 - Jan 8, 2013 | -0.15% Sep 8, 2025 - Sep 10, 2025 |
| #15 | -5.98% Dec 31, 2001 - Apr 5, 2002 | -0.15% Feb 26, 2025 - Feb 28, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between LEO and TCPB is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
0.91
-101
Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)
LEO vs TCPB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LEO | TCPB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.99% | 1.82% |
| 2025 | 4.03% | 3.85% |
| 2024 | 3.77% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 4.37% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 5.66% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 4.84% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 4.95% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 4.94% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 5.96% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 5.97% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 6.14% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 6.04% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 7.11% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 7.74% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 6.16% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 6.61% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 7.54% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 6.32% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 8.94% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 6.13% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.03% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.51% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 7.38% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 7.32% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 7.14% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.74% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: LEO vs SPYTCPB vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks