LEO vs DDLS

Comparison between BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO, ETF) and WISDOMTREE DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL SMALLCAP EQUITY FUND (DDLS, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceDDLS has outperformed LEO, delivering a return of +10.0% compared to -4.1%

LEO vs DDLS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	LEO(ETF)	DDLS(ETF)
Net Assets	$420M	$421M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.48%
Max Drawdown	54.53%	39.42%
Sharpe Ratio	0.57	0.85
5Y Beta	0.18	0.62
5Y Dividends CAGR	-6.11%	16.34%

Net Assets

LEO

$420M

Winner

DDLS

$421M

Expense Ratio

LEO

N/A

DDLS

0.48%

Max Drawdown

LEO

54.53%

Winner

DDLS

39.42%

Sharpe Ratio

LEO

0.57

Winner

DDLS

0.85

5Y Beta

Winner

LEO

0.18

DDLS

0.62

5Y Dividends CAGR

LEO

-6.11%

Winner

DDLS

16.34%

LEO vs DDLS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	LEO	DDLS
1 month	-0.65%	+2.86%
3 months	-2.22%	+2.09%
6 months	-2.68%	+0.94%
1 year	+10.17%	+15.29%
5 years(CAGR)	-4.07%	+9.95%
10 years(CAGR)	+0.87%	+9.87%
Max(CAGR)	+4.69%	+10.05%

LEO

-0.65%

Winner

DDLS

+2.86%

LEO

-2.22%

Winner

DDLS

+2.09%

LEO

-2.68%

Winner

DDLS

+0.94%

LEO

+10.17%

Winner

DDLS

+15.29%

5Y(CAGR)

LEO

-4.07%

Winner

DDLS

+9.95%

10Y(CAGR)

LEO

+0.87%

Winner

DDLS

+9.87%

Max(CAGR)

LEO

+4.69%

Winner

DDLS

+10.05%

LEO vs DDLS - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	LEO	DDLS
2026	+0.05%	+9.59%
2025	+8.40%	+28.36%
2024	+6.40%	+11.28%
2023	-1.05%	+14.21%
2022	-23.74%	-10.87%
2021	+5.05%	+17.66%
2020	+4.86%	-4.05%
2019	+22.72%	+24.61%
2018	-12.42%	-17.35%
2017	+8.83%	+25.36%
2016	+3.50%	+14.45%
2015	+11.03%	N/A
2014	+15.50%	N/A
2013	-16.60%	N/A
2012	+14.70%	N/A
2011	+23.10%	N/A
2010	+3.15%	N/A
2009	+46.92%	N/A
2008	-27.48%	N/A
2007	-7.07%	N/A
2006	+13.96%	N/A
2005	+7.55%	N/A
2004	-7.35%	N/A
2003	+10.84%	N/A
2002	+6.78%	N/A
2001	+22.11%	N/A

LEO vs DDLS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LEO was -47.31%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 671 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for DDLS was -36.80%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 277 trading sessions.

The current LEO drawdown is -18.76%.

Rank	LEO	DDLS
#1	-47.31% May 7, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010	-36.80% Jan 2, 2020 - Feb 8, 2021
#2	-41.48% Aug 27, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023	-23.10% Jan 26, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019
#3	-30.28% Feb 25, 2020 - Feb 5, 2021	-19.88% Sep 3, 2021 - Dec 21, 2023
#4	-23.62% Jan 8, 2013 - Nov 3, 2015	-11.66% Mar 19, 2025 - Apr 28, 2025
#5	-21.68% Jan 21, 2004 - Sep 7, 2005	-10.69% Feb 26, 2026 - Aug 13, 2026
#6	-19.81% Sep 10, 2010 - Oct 12, 2011	-7.98% Apr 19, 2016 - Aug 16, 2016
#7	-17.32% Aug 1, 2017 - Jul 2, 2019	-7.49% Jul 16, 2024 - Aug 21, 2024
#8	-12.16% Jul 8, 2016 - Jul 11, 2017	-6.01% Sep 26, 2024 - Mar 17, 2025
#9	-11.77% Oct 1, 2002 - Apr 29, 2003	-4.18% Oct 27, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025
#10	-11.61% Jun 12, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004	-3.64% Aug 23, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024
#11	-9.85% Aug 28, 2001 - Dec 31, 2001	-3.52% Jun 14, 2021 - Jul 26, 2021
#12	-8.30% Sep 7, 2005 - Mar 29, 2006	-3.51% Sep 7, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016
#13	-6.69% Mar 12, 2012 - May 9, 2012	-3.33% Dec 28, 2023 - Feb 22, 2024
#14	-6.02% Nov 29, 2012 - Jan 8, 2013	-3.31% May 31, 2024 - Jul 5, 2024
#15	-5.98% Dec 31, 2001 - Apr 5, 2002	-3.22% Nov 8, 2017 - Dec 13, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between LEO and DDLS is 0.24 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

0.24

-101

Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)

LEO vs DDLS dividend yield comparison.

Year	LEO	DDLS
2026	3.52%	1.86%
2025	4.03%	3.80%
2024	3.77%	4.11%
2023	4.37%	4.05%
2022	5.66%	5.44%
2021	4.84%	3.18%
2020	4.95%	3.16%
2019	4.94%	3.68%
2018	5.96%	1.75%
2017	5.97%	1.60%
2016	6.14%	3.47%
2015	6.04%	0.00%
2014	7.11%	0.00%
2013	7.74%	0.00%
2012	6.16%	0.00%
2011	6.61%	0.00%
2010	7.54%	0.00%
2009	6.32%	0.00%
2008	8.94%	0.00%
2007	6.13%	0.00%
2006	5.03%	0.00%
2005	6.51%	0.00%
2004	7.38%	0.00%
2003	7.32%	0.00%
2002	7.14%	0.00%
2001	5.74%	0.00%