LCUT vs WHWK

Comparison between Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT, Company) and Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK, Company).

LCUT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while WHWK is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceLCUT has outperformed WHWK, delivering a return of -11.4% compared to -31.4%

LCUT vs WHWK - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	LCUT(COMPANY)	WHWK(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$192M	$192M
Max Drawdown	96.70%	98.67%
Sharpe Ratio	1.29	1.57
5Y Beta	0.91	1.12
Industry	Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances	Biotechnology
P/E Ratio	-6.95	-1.66
Forward P/E	12.64	2.66
PEG Ratio	-0.07	-0.00
Dividend Yield	1.97%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	-3.58%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	88.33%
Debt to Equity	2.56%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	9.37%	-56.11%
P/S Ratio	0.29	30.04
P/B Ratio	0.99	1.64

Market Cap

Winner

LCUT

$192M

WHWK

$192M

Max Drawdown

Winner

LCUT

96.70%

WHWK

98.67%

Sharpe Ratio

LCUT

1.29

Winner

WHWK

1.57

5Y Beta

Winner

LCUT

0.91

WHWK

1.12

Industry

LCUT

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

WHWK

Biotechnology

P/E Ratio

Winner

LCUT

-6.95

WHWK

-1.66

Forward P/E

LCUT

12.64

Winner

WHWK

2.66

PEG Ratio

Winner

LCUT

-0.07

WHWK

-0.00

Dividend Yield

LCUT

1.97%

WHWK

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

LCUT

-3.58%

WHWK

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

LCUT

N/A

WHWK

88.33%

Debt to Equity

LCUT

2.56%

Winner

WHWK

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

LCUT

9.37%

WHWK

-56.11%

P/S Ratio

Winner

LCUT

0.29

WHWK

30.04

P/B Ratio

Winner

LCUT

0.99

WHWK

1.64

LCUT vs WHWK - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	LCUT	WHWK
1 month	+4.35%	+16.92%
3 months	+56.99%	+13.25%
6 months	+163.46%	+70.29%
1 year	+116.03%	+161.11%
5 years(CAGR)	-11.39%	-31.39%
10 years(CAGR)	-3.22%	-27.98%
Max(CAGR)	+3.59%	-27.98%

LCUT

+4.35%

Winner

WHWK

+16.92%

Winner

LCUT

+56.99%

WHWK

+13.25%

Winner

LCUT

+163.46%

WHWK

+70.29%

LCUT

+116.03%

Winner

WHWK

+161.11%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

LCUT

-11.39%

WHWK

-31.39%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

LCUT

-3.22%

WHWK

-27.98%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

LCUT

+3.59%

WHWK

-27.98%

LCUT vs WHWK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	LCUT	WHWK
2026	+129.26%	+92.62%
2025	-27.17%	-22.93%
2024	-17.32%	+53.90%
2023	-10.24%	-83.59%
2022	-52.58%	-48.62%
2021	+9.06%	+53.33%
2020	+112.18%	+53.13%
2019	-28.96%	-68.64%
2018	-40.19%	-66.00%
2017	-4.82%	-20.83%
2016	+38.41%	N/A
2015	-20.45%	N/A
2014	+12.82%	N/A
2013	+48.02%	N/A
2012	-13.38%	N/A
2011	-17.76%	N/A
2010	+97.19%	N/A
2009	+91.69%	N/A
2008	-71.96%	N/A
2007	-21.91%	N/A
2006	-20.78%	N/A
2005	+32.26%	N/A
2004	+1.40%	N/A
2003	+264.25%	N/A
2002	-17.12%	N/A
2001	-8.43%	N/A
2000	+39.49%	N/A
1999	-5.65%	N/A

LCUT vs WHWK Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LCUT was -96.52%, occurring on Mar 13, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for WHWK was -98.67%, occurring on Jul 2, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current LCUT drawdown is -60.29%. The current WHWK drawdown is -95.25%.

Rank	LCUT	WHWK
#1	-96.52% May 3, 2006 - Mar 13, 2009	-98.67% Oct 10, 2017 - Jul 2, 2024
#2	-48.71% Jul 2, 2004 - Jul 15, 2005	-7.69% Sep 22, 2017 - Oct 10, 2017
#3	-44.64% Jun 21, 2000 - Jun 19, 2003	-2.15% Aug 15, 2017 - Sep 14, 2017
#4	-26.67% Sep 29, 2005 - Mar 29, 2006	-0.83% Aug 8, 2017 - Aug 15, 2017
#5	-21.02% Dec 30, 2003 - Mar 29, 2004	-0.80% Sep 14, 2017 - Sep 21, 2017
#6	-19.78% Dec 9, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000	N/A
#7	-18.33% Feb 8, 2000 - Apr 17, 2000	N/A
#8	-15.94% May 17, 2000 - Jun 21, 2000	N/A
#9	-14.89% Aug 2, 2005 - Sep 15, 2005	N/A
#10	-13.04% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 9, 1999	N/A
#11	-10.04% Oct 30, 2003 - Nov 24, 2003	N/A
#12	-6.61% Oct 13, 2003 - Oct 30, 2003	N/A
#13	-5.78% Apr 28, 2004 - May 5, 2004	N/A
#14	-5.72% May 18, 2004 - Jun 23, 2004	N/A
#15	-4.95% Feb 1, 2000 - Feb 4, 2000	N/A