LCUT vs EBMT
Comparison between Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT, Company) and Eagle Bancorp Montana Inc (EBMT, Company).
LCUT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while EBMT is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceEBMT has outperformed LCUT, delivering a return of +4.9% compared to -8.9%
LCUT vs EBMT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LCUT vs EBMT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LCUT vs EBMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LCUT | EBMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +124.78% | +22.03% |
| 2025 | -27.17% | +39.38% |
| 2024 | -17.32% | -0.87% |
| 2023 | -10.24% | -0.30% |
| 2022 | -52.58% | -27.45% |
| 2021 | +9.06% | +12.65% |
| 2020 | +112.18% | -0.14% |
| 2019 | -28.96% | +32.88% |
| 2018 | -40.19% | -17.74% |
| 2017 | -4.82% | -0.86% |
| 2016 | +38.41% | +80.00% |
| 2015 | -20.45% | +17.49% |
| 2014 | +12.82% | +3.22% |
| 2013 | +48.02% | +7.03% |
| 2012 | -13.38% | +9.16% |
| 2011 | -17.76% | -6.29% |
| 2010 | +97.19% | +29.67% |
| 2009 | +91.69% | +47.53% |
| 2008 | -71.96% | -22.38% |
| 2007 | -21.91% | -2.53% |
| 2006 | -20.78% | -3.30% |
| 2005 | +32.26% | +2.87% |
| 2004 | +1.40% | -2.88% |
| 2003 | +264.25% | +55.62% |
| 2002 | -17.12% | +56.07% |
| 2001 | -8.43% | +44.50% |
| 2000 | +39.49% | +29.08% |
| 1999 | -5.65% | N/A |
LCUT vs EBMT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LCUT was -96.52%, occurring on Mar 13, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for EBMT was -51.84%, occurring on Oct 23, 2023. Recovery took 1227 trading sessions.
The current LCUT drawdown is -61.07%. The current EBMT drawdown is -3.52%.
| Rank | LCUT | EBMT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -96.52% May 3, 2006 - Mar 13, 2009 | -51.84% Mar 15, 2021 - Feb 2, 2026 |
| #2 | -48.71% Jul 2, 2004 - Jul 15, 2005 | -46.25% Apr 6, 2004 - Mar 5, 2010 |
| #3 | -44.64% Jun 21, 2000 - Jun 19, 2003 | -45.82% Jan 21, 2020 - Dec 8, 2020 |
| #4 | -26.67% Sep 29, 2005 - Mar 29, 2006 | -26.68% Nov 29, 2017 - Nov 27, 2019 |
| #5 | -21.02% Dec 30, 2003 - Mar 29, 2004 | -22.85% Apr 25, 2000 - Aug 29, 2000 |
| #6 | -19.78% Dec 9, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000 | -21.20% Mar 31, 2010 - Jan 12, 2011 |
| #7 | -18.33% Feb 8, 2000 - Apr 17, 2000 | -20.00% Apr 7, 2000 - Apr 25, 2000 |
| #8 | -15.94% May 17, 2000 - Jun 21, 2000 | -19.95% Dec 21, 2016 - Nov 29, 2017 |
| #9 | -14.89% Aug 2, 2005 - Sep 15, 2005 | -17.51% Apr 1, 2011 - Jul 22, 2013 |
| #10 | -13.04% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 9, 1999 | -16.98% Mar 21, 2001 - May 7, 2001 |
| #11 | -10.04% Oct 30, 2003 - Nov 24, 2003 | -16.24% May 21, 2003 - Oct 3, 2003 |
| #12 | -6.61% Oct 13, 2003 - Oct 30, 2003 | -14.81% May 7, 2001 - Jul 20, 2001 |
| #13 | -5.78% Apr 28, 2004 - May 5, 2004 | -13.31% Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 9, 2026 |
| #14 | -5.72% May 18, 2004 - Jun 23, 2004 | -12.75% Oct 6, 2003 - Jan 16, 2004 |
| #15 | -4.95% Feb 1, 2000 - Feb 4, 2000 | -12.50% Jul 20, 2001 - Sep 27, 2001 |
Correlation
Correlation between LCUT and EBMT is 0.09 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
LCUT vs EBMT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LCUT | EBMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.49% | 1.23% |
| 2025 | 4.30% | 2.89% |
| 2024 | 2.88% | 3.69% |
| 2023 | 2.53% | 3.51% |
| 2022 | 2.24% | 3.25% |
| 2021 | 1.06% | 1.94% |
| 2020 | 1.12% | 1.81% |
| 2019 | 2.45% | 1.75% |
| 2018 | 1.69% | 2.21% |
| 2017 | 1.03% | 1.62% |
| 2016 | 0.96% | 1.49% |
| 2015 | 1.17% | 2.47% |
| 2014 | 0.87% | 2.69% |
| 2013 | 0.75% | 2.64% |
| 2012 | 0.94% | 2.76% |
| 2011 | 0.62% | 2.87% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 2.56% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.15% |
| 2008 | 7.06% | 4.31% |
| 2007 | 1.93% | 2.99% |
| 2006 | 1.52% | 2.58% |
| 2005 | 1.21% | 2.20% |
| 2004 | 1.57% | 1.98% |
| 2003 | 1.48% | 1.61% |
| 2002 | 5.24% | 1.95% |
| 2001 | 4.17% | 2.19% |
| 2000 | 3.45% | 1.29% |
| 1999 | 1.19% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks