LCII vs KMT
Comparison between LCI Industries (LCII, Company) and Kennametal Inc (KMT, Company).
LCII is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while KMT is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceKMT has outperformed LCII, delivering a return of +1.4% compared to -2.8%
LCII vs KMT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LCII vs KMT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LCII vs KMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LCII | KMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -13.12% | +17.95% |
| 2025 | +24.98% | +24.07% |
| 2024 | -14.70% | -2.98% |
| 2023 | +37.96% | +9.92% |
| 2022 | -39.55% | -32.27% |
| 2021 | +24.24% | +4.12% |
| 2020 | +23.61% | -0.23% |
| 2019 | +64.61% | +12.66% |
| 2018 | -47.77% | -31.15% |
| 2017 | +13.82% | +54.96% |
| 2016 | +86.94% | +68.38% |
| 2015 | +25.85% | -44.74% |
| 2014 | +1.11% | -29.60% |
| 2013 | +59.41% | +23.15% |
| 2012 | +38.86% | +8.51% |
| 2011 | +4.25% | -9.22% |
| 2010 | +12.74% | +47.61% |
| 2009 | +67.89% | +11.07% |
| 2008 | -55.70% | -38.46% |
| 2007 | +9.21% | +30.29% |
| 2006 | -14.55% | +13.95% |
| 2005 | +55.49% | +4.44% |
| 2004 | +29.64% | +27.01% |
| 2003 | +71.60% | +14.68% |
| 2002 | +47.25% | -10.85% |
| 2001 | +82.82% | +44.42% |
| 2000 | -37.84% | -6.39% |
| 1999 | +0.00% | +16.66% |
LCII vs KMT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LCII was -87.55%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for KMT was -70.10%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 809 trading sessions.
The current LCII drawdown is -31.27%. The current KMT drawdown is -21.36%.
| Rank | LCII | KMT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -87.55% Oct 5, 2007 - Jun 10, 2013 | -70.10% Oct 31, 2007 - Jan 18, 2011 |
| #2 | -53.87% Dec 18, 2017 - Jul 29, 2020 | -69.26% Jan 12, 2018 - Mar 4, 2026 |
| #3 | -50.98% Dec 9, 1999 - Jul 23, 2001 | -68.20% Dec 31, 2013 - Dec 13, 2017 |
| #4 | -47.21% Dec 6, 2021 - Jan 20, 2026 | -41.82% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 8, 2001 |
| #5 | -41.75% Feb 13, 2026 - Jun 17, 2026 | -35.07% May 23, 2002 - Jan 12, 2004 |
| #6 | -40.64% Apr 20, 2006 - Aug 2, 2007 | -34.76% Mar 15, 2012 - Sep 16, 2013 |
| #7 | -24.98% Jun 8, 2004 - May 9, 2005 | -33.78% Jul 19, 2011 - Feb 8, 2012 |
| #8 | -24.35% Mar 31, 2014 - Feb 24, 2015 | -26.24% May 6, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026 |
| #9 | -24.16% Jan 27, 2017 - Sep 29, 2017 | -24.97% May 8, 2006 - Mar 22, 2007 |
| #10 | -23.23% Mar 4, 2002 - Apr 29, 2002 | -24.70% Aug 10, 2001 - Nov 19, 2001 |
| #11 | -20.73% May 14, 2002 - Jun 5, 2003 | -20.27% Mar 8, 2001 - Apr 25, 2001 |
| #12 | -19.95% Aug 3, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020 | -18.34% Jul 19, 2007 - Oct 24, 2007 |
| #13 | -18.32% Apr 26, 2021 - Nov 10, 2021 | -18.33% Mar 4, 2026 - May 6, 2026 |
| #14 | -17.82% Sep 2, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016 | -17.69% Dec 1, 2004 - Nov 2, 2005 |
| #15 | -17.00% Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 26, 2021 | -14.88% Jan 18, 2011 - Jul 1, 2011 |
Correlation
Correlation between LCII and KMT is 0.62 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
LCII vs KMT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LCII | KMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.17% | 1.18% |
| 2025 | 3.79% | 2.82% |
| 2024 | 4.16% | 3.33% |
| 2023 | 3.34% | 3.10% |
| 2022 | 4.38% | 3.33% |
| 2021 | 2.21% | 2.23% |
| 2020 | 2.16% | 2.21% |
| 2019 | 2.38% | 2.17% |
| 2018 | 3.52% | 2.40% |
| 2017 | 1.58% | 1.65% |
| 2016 | 1.30% | 2.56% |
| 2015 | 3.28% | 3.96% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| 2013 | 3.91% | 1.31% |
| 2012 | 6.20% | 1.50% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| 2010 | 6.60% | 1.22% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.85% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.16% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.15% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.33% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.41% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.71% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.97% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 2.33% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.51% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks