LAD vs CLF
Comparison between Lithia Motors Inc - Class A (LAD, Company) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company).
LAD is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while CLF is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceLAD has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of -5.1% compared to -12.0%
LAD vs CLF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LAD vs CLF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LAD vs CLF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LAD | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -19.97% | -21.65% |
| 2025 | -4.01% | +39.20% |
| 2024 | +10.83% | -52.45% |
| 2023 | +64.95% | +21.62% |
| 2022 | -30.82% | -25.86% |
| 2021 | +4.86% | +50.97% |
| 2020 | +100.29% | +88.69% |
| 2019 | +89.01% | +10.16% |
| 2018 | -32.82% | -2.66% |
| 2017 | +17.04% | -16.26% |
| 2016 | -4.96% | +403.59% |
| 2015 | +23.12% | -77.52% |
| 2014 | +27.61% | -71.27% |
| 2013 | +79.17% | -30.80% |
| 2012 | +71.54% | -38.56% |
| 2011 | +49.69% | -23.00% |
| 2010 | +80.14% | +63.25% |
| 2009 | +149.09% | +57.60% |
| 2008 | -74.04% | -46.54% |
| 2007 | -48.37% | +112.27% |
| 2006 | -6.17% | +5.86% |
| 2005 | +22.27% | +76.79% |
| 2004 | +8.42% | +95.85% |
| 2003 | +64.99% | +147.09% |
| 2002 | -23.46% | +7.53% |
| 2001 | +60.71% | -14.70% |
| 2000 | -29.68% | -24.00% |
| 1999 | -8.59% | +8.53% |
LAD vs CLF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LAD was -95.16%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 1626 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current LAD drawdown is -33.77%. The current CLF drawdown is -89.10%.
| Rank | LAD | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -95.16% Mar 27, 2006 - Sep 7, 2012 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 |
| #2 | -64.23% May 7, 2002 - Mar 8, 2004 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 |
| #3 | -61.15% Nov 27, 2019 - Jul 10, 2020 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 |
| #4 | -55.47% Mar 17, 2021 - Oct 20, 2022 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 |
| #5 | -44.79% Dec 1, 2015 - Jan 12, 2018 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 |
| #6 | -44.69% Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 24, 2019 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 |
| #7 | -42.47% May 15, 2001 - Jan 4, 2002 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #8 | -41.82% Nov 1, 1999 - May 9, 2001 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 |
| #9 | -33.46% Jul 3, 2014 - Mar 19, 2015 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 |
| #10 | -32.35% Mar 8, 2004 - Jul 26, 2005 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 |
| #11 | -26.32% Oct 1, 2013 - Apr 29, 2014 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 |
| #12 | -20.19% Aug 18, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 |
| #13 | -19.62% Aug 3, 2005 - Dec 14, 2005 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 |
| #14 | -19.11% Oct 7, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 |
| #15 | -16.59% Jan 4, 2002 - Mar 8, 2002 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between LAD and CLF is -0.18 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
LAD vs CLF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LAD | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 0.66% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 0.58% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 0.58% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 0.79% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 0.46% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 0.42% | 0.82% |
| 2019 | 0.81% | 3.10% |
| 2018 | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.93% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 0.98% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 0.71% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.70% | 8.40% |
| 2013 | 0.56% | 2.29% |
| 2012 | 1.26% | 5.59% |
| 2011 | 1.19% | 1.35% |
| 2010 | 1.05% | 0.65% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| 2008 | 14.42% | 1.37% |
| 2007 | 4.08% | 0.50% |
| 2006 | 1.81% | 0.98% |
| 2005 | 1.27% | 0.68% |
| 2004 | 1.12% | 0.19% |
| 2003 | 0.56% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.19% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 6.96% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks