StockComparison Logo
vs

L vs CHRW

Comparison between Loews Corp (L, Company) and C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc (CHRW, Company).

L is from the Financial Services sector, while CHRW is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCHRW has outperformed L, delivering a return of +20.3% compared to +16.6%

L vs CHRW - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
L
$23B
Winner
CHRW
$23B
Max Drawdown
L
66.01%
Winner
CHRW
43.44%
Sharpe Ratio
L
1.19
Winner
CHRW
1.95
5Y Beta
Winner
L
0.46
CHRW
0.66
Industry
L
Insurance - Property & Casualty
CHRW
Integrated Freight & Logistics
P/E Ratio
Winner
L
14.66
CHRW
39.02
Forward P/E
Winner
L
12.20
CHRW
33.44
PEG Ratio
Winner
L
0.97
CHRW
2.19
Dividend Yield
L
0.22%
Winner
CHRW
1.21%
5Y Dividends CAGR
L
4.56%
Winner
CHRW
8.94%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
L
15.75%
CHRW
2.50%
Debt to Equity
Winner
L
0.00%
CHRW
78.79%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
L
8.32%
CHRW
3.68%
P/S Ratio
Winner
L
1.27
CHRW
1.44
P/B Ratio
Winner
L
1.28
CHRW
13.81

L vs CHRW - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
L
+5.95%
Winner
CHRW
+11.95%
3M
L
+2.81%
Winner
CHRW
+14.43%
6M
L
+12.03%
Winner
CHRW
+17.56%
1Y
L
+25.75%
Winner
CHRW
+119.75%
5Y(CAGR)
L
+16.59%
Winner
CHRW
+20.31%
10Y(CAGR)
L
+11.41%
Winner
CHRW
+13.99%
Max(CAGR)
L
+9.92%
Winner
CHRW
+14.94%

L vs CHRW - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearLCHRW
2026+9.59%+28.80%
2025+25.47%+59.79%
2024+20.58%+21.85%
2023+19.25%-1.73%
2022+0.81%-13.31%
2021+30.68%+19.07%
2020-14.46%+23.60%
2019+17.03%-3.44%
2018-8.29%-4.31%
2017+7.70%+25.23%
2016+24.72%+21.44%
2015-7.41%-14.01%
2014-10.80%+32.54%
2013+16.79%-5.32%
2012+6.59%-7.46%
2011-3.83%-12.94%
2010+5.39%+37.38%
2009+23.20%+7.19%
2008-43.83%+7.86%
2007+22.76%+26.85%
2006+29.47%+11.07%
2005+37.58%+36.39%
2004+44.03%+48.07%
2003+8.24%+20.46%
2002-18.52%+9.33%
2001+11.69%-2.53%
2000+78.21%+61.78%
1999-9.42%+20.26%

L vs CHRW Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for L was -65.59%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2616 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CHRW was -42.38%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 561 trading sessions.

The current L drawdown is -2.04%.

RankLCHRW
#1-65.59%
Jun 19, 2007 - Nov 6, 2017
-42.38%
May 6, 2008 - Jul 28, 2010
#2-48.52%
Jul 3, 2019 - Apr 29, 2021
-40.56%
Aug 25, 2022 - Dec 12, 2024
#3-45.96%
May 4, 2001 - Nov 29, 2004
-37.68%
Sep 10, 2018 - Aug 10, 2020
#4-41.13%
Nov 8, 1999 - Aug 8, 2000
-35.12%
Jul 7, 2011 - Dec 19, 2014
#5-26.11%
Apr 20, 2022 - Nov 16, 2023
-31.29%
Mar 7, 2000 - May 5, 2000
#6-20.02%
Jan 26, 2018 - Jun 5, 2019
-27.50%
Jul 3, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007
#7-14.30%
Dec 28, 2000 - Feb 5, 2001
-27.33%
Dec 8, 2000 - Mar 22, 2002
#8-12.16%
Apr 1, 2025 - Jul 1, 2025
-25.14%
Apr 16, 2002 - Apr 15, 2003
#9-12.07%
May 14, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
-24.72%
Jul 31, 2000 - Dec 7, 2000
#10-9.82%
Sep 28, 2000 - Oct 27, 2000
-23.29%
Dec 12, 2024 - Jul 31, 2025
#11-9.67%
Mar 9, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001
-20.50%
Jan 6, 2022 - Mar 29, 2022
#12-9.49%
May 5, 2006 - Jul 31, 2006
-20.27%
Dec 24, 2014 - Apr 19, 2016
#13-8.29%
Jan 13, 2006 - Mar 27, 2006
-20.07%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jul 14, 2026
#14-7.99%
Apr 30, 2026 - Jun 26, 2026
-19.86%
May 5, 2000 - Jul 12, 2000
#15-7.36%
Oct 30, 2000 - Nov 10, 2000
-19.85%
Apr 25, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008

Correlation

Correlation between L and CHRW is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.93
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

L vs CHRW dividend yield comparison.

YearLCHRW
20260.11%0.60%
20250.24%1.55%
20240.30%2.38%
20230.36%2.82%
20220.43%2.47%
20210.43%1.93%
20200.56%2.17%
20190.48%2.57%
20180.55%2.24%
20171.58%2.03%
20160.53%2.38%
20150.65%2.53%
20140.59%1.91%
20130.51%2.40%
20120.61%2.12%
20110.66%1.72%
20100.64%1.30%
20090.69%1.65%
20080.88%1.64%
20070.50%1.40%
20060.57%1.39%
20050.63%0.96%
20040.85%0.92%
20031.21%0.95%
20021.35%0.83%
20011.76%0.73%
20000.97%0.54%
19990.00%0.20%

Select Stocks to Compare