KMB vs TRI
Comparison between Kimberly-Clark Corp (KMB, Company) and Thomson-Reuters Corp (TRI, Company).
KMB is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while TRI is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceKMB has outperformed TRI, delivering a return of -0.1% compared to -1.5%
KMB vs TRI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
KMB vs TRI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
KMB vs TRI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | KMB | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +10.59% | -32.64% |
| 2025 | -19.62% | -17.06% |
| 2024 | +11.01% | +12.82% |
| 2023 | -8.02% | +28.64% |
| 2022 | -1.23% | -0.97% |
| 2021 | +10.86% | +51.02% |
| 2020 | +2.28% | +15.80% |
| 2019 | +26.98% | +53.97% |
| 2018 | -0.80% | +14.09% |
| 2017 | +8.63% | +2.50% |
| 2016 | -7.09% | +22.07% |
| 2015 | +13.74% | -2.07% |
| 2014 | +19.60% | +13.45% |
| 2013 | +25.04% | +33.37% |
| 2012 | +19.67% | +12.37% |
| 2011 | +22.43% | -27.57% |
| 2010 | +2.32% | +17.92% |
| 2009 | +24.02% | +16.31% |
| 2008 | -20.42% | -26.04% |
| 2007 | +4.61% | -0.57% |
| 2006 | +18.00% | +22.33% |
| 2005 | -4.91% | +0.75% |
| 2004 | +16.83% | -2.37% |
| 2003 | +27.89% | +37.12% |
| 2002 | -18.38% | -12.38% |
| 2001 | -12.04% | N/A |
| 2000 | +12.64% | N/A |
| 1999 | +5.97% | N/A |
KMB vs TRI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for KMB was -36.99%, occurring on Mar 10, 2003. Recovery took 874 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TRI was -63.45%, occurring on Jun 22, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current KMB drawdown is -21.51%. The current TRI drawdown is -59.95%.
| Rank | KMB | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -36.99% Mar 8, 2001 - Sep 1, 2004 | -63.45% Jul 14, 2025 - Jun 22, 2026 |
| #2 | -35.10% Jun 5, 2007 - Nov 23, 2009 | -56.41% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2013 |
| #3 | -34.07% Mar 10, 2025 - Apr 7, 2026 | -35.36% Feb 19, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 |
| #4 | -33.24% Nov 17, 1999 - Oct 30, 2000 | -26.73% Jun 28, 2002 - May 20, 2003 |
| #5 | -25.55% Aug 12, 2020 - Apr 25, 2023 | -24.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Feb 13, 2023 |
| #6 | -24.62% Mar 15, 2017 - Apr 22, 2019 | -20.38% Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 3, 2018 |
| #7 | -23.66% Mar 4, 2020 - Jul 23, 2020 | -18.30% Jan 2, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 |
| #8 | -18.72% Apr 27, 2023 - Jun 17, 2024 | -17.36% Oct 22, 2015 - Apr 26, 2016 |
| #9 | -18.11% Jul 5, 2016 - Mar 15, 2017 | -14.34% Jun 27, 2023 - Nov 17, 2023 |
| #10 | -16.13% Feb 14, 2005 - Sep 11, 2006 | -13.21% Feb 17, 2005 - Aug 10, 2005 |
| #11 | -14.67% Sep 9, 2024 - Mar 7, 2025 | -11.96% May 24, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 |
| #12 | -12.84% Sep 3, 2004 - Feb 3, 2005 | -11.63% Nov 14, 2013 - Jul 9, 2014 |
| #13 | -12.77% Dec 4, 2000 - Feb 20, 2001 | -11.24% Sep 19, 2005 - Feb 15, 2006 |
| #14 | -12.12% Aug 5, 2015 - Oct 16, 2015 | -11.20% Apr 15, 2015 - Oct 12, 2015 |
| #15 | -12.05% Apr 19, 2013 - Oct 23, 2013 | -10.65% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between KMB and TRI is 0.82 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
KMB vs TRI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | KMB | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.34% | 3.29% |
| 2025 | 5.00% | 1.80% |
| 2024 | 3.72% | 1.35% |
| 2023 | 3.88% | 4.68% |
| 2022 | 3.42% | 1.56% |
| 2021 | 3.19% | 1.76% |
| 2020 | 3.17% | 1.86% |
| 2019 | 3.00% | 2.01% |
| 2018 | 3.51% | 2.87% |
| 2017 | 3.22% | 3.17% |
| 2016 | 3.22% | 3.11% |
| 2015 | 2.77% | 3.54% |
| 2014 | 7.04% | 4.51% |
| 2013 | 3.10% | 3.44% |
| 2012 | 3.51% | 4.41% |
| 2011 | 3.81% | 4.65% |
| 2010 | 4.19% | 3.11% |
| 2009 | 3.77% | 3.47% |
| 2008 | 4.40% | 2.77% |
| 2007 | 3.06% | 1.80% |
| 2006 | 2.88% | 2.12% |
| 2005 | 3.02% | 2.28% |
| 2004 | 3.97% | 2.14% |
| 2003 | 2.30% | 3.18% |
| 2002 | 2.53% | 1.33% |
| 2001 | 1.87% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.53% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks