KIM vs ZBH
Comparison between Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM, Company) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc (ZBH, Company).
KIM is from the Real Estate sector, while ZBH is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceKIM has outperformed ZBH, delivering a return of +6.3% compared to -12.5%
KIM vs ZBH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
KIM vs ZBH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
KIM vs ZBH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | KIM | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +18.36% | -8.30% |
| 2025 | -7.49% | -13.07% |
| 2024 | +15.19% | -12.24% |
| 2023 | +5.65% | -3.65% |
| 2022 | -10.54% | +2.54% |
| 2021 | +77.51% | -16.52% |
| 2020 | -19.32% | +4.09% |
| 2019 | +50.49% | +47.42% |
| 2018 | -13.05% | -15.68% |
| 2017 | -24.40% | +17.71% |
| 2016 | +1.38% | +2.23% |
| 2015 | +8.04% | -8.12% |
| 2014 | +32.30% | +24.01% |
| 2013 | +5.34% | +39.03% |
| 2012 | +21.03% | +24.96% |
| 2011 | -7.63% | -2.82% |
| 2010 | +37.72% | -10.56% |
| 2009 | -19.52% | +41.55% |
| 2008 | -46.82% | -39.03% |
| 2007 | -16.33% | -14.20% |
| 2006 | +42.03% | +14.46% |
| 2005 | +16.39% | -15.04% |
| 2004 | +35.26% | +14.46% |
| 2003 | +51.95% | +74.69% |
| 2002 | -1.45% | +37.35% |
| 2001 | +18.99% | +2.62% |
| 2000 | +39.39% | N/A |
| 1999 | +1.58% | N/A |
KIM vs ZBH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for KIM was -85.66%, occurring on Mar 30, 2009. Recovery took 3817 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ZBH was -65.03%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1652 trading sessions.
The current KIM drawdown is -2.94%. The current ZBH drawdown is -50.49%.
| Rank | KIM | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -85.66% Feb 21, 2007 - Apr 19, 2022 | -65.03% Apr 26, 2007 - Nov 14, 2013 |
| #2 | -33.66% Apr 28, 2022 - Sep 11, 2024 | -51.85% Apr 29, 2021 - Apr 29, 2026 |
| #3 | -25.89% Nov 27, 2024 - Apr 17, 2026 | -49.73% Feb 14, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #4 | -20.79% Apr 1, 2004 - Sep 3, 2004 | -40.49% Jul 7, 2004 - Apr 17, 2007 |
| #5 | -15.35% Apr 12, 2002 - Feb 14, 2003 | -26.23% Aug 9, 2016 - Jul 14, 2017 |
| #6 | -15.12% Mar 29, 2006 - Aug 22, 2006 | -26.04% Sep 28, 2018 - Jul 26, 2019 |
| #7 | -14.00% Aug 2, 2005 - Dec 23, 2005 | -24.07% Feb 24, 2015 - May 24, 2016 |
| #8 | -11.20% Nov 3, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000 | -20.18% Jul 17, 2017 - Sep 28, 2018 |
| #9 | -10.77% Aug 21, 2001 - Oct 9, 2001 | -19.22% Mar 4, 2002 - Jul 30, 2002 |
| #10 | -10.28% Dec 30, 2004 - May 18, 2005 | -16.43% Aug 7, 2001 - Oct 16, 2001 |
| #11 | -9.97% Dec 6, 2001 - Apr 10, 2002 | -14.52% Mar 21, 2003 - Aug 6, 2003 |
| #12 | -7.86% Jan 10, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000 | -12.07% Nov 7, 2002 - Feb 18, 2003 |
| #13 | -7.84% Jan 3, 2001 - Apr 26, 2001 | -10.91% Jun 6, 2014 - Oct 28, 2014 |
| #14 | -7.03% Jul 25, 2000 - Dec 5, 2000 | -10.74% Mar 8, 2004 - Apr 16, 2004 |
| #15 | -6.74% Sep 4, 2003 - Nov 6, 2003 | -10.05% Dec 6, 2001 - Jan 30, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between KIM and ZBH is 0.65 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
KIM vs ZBH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | KIM | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.11% | 0.29% |
| 2025 | 4.98% | 1.07% |
| 2024 | 4.14% | 0.91% |
| 2023 | 4.79% | 0.79% |
| 2022 | 3.97% | 0.75% |
| 2021 | 2.76% | 0.76% |
| 2020 | 3.60% | 0.62% |
| 2019 | 5.41% | 0.64% |
| 2018 | 7.65% | 0.93% |
| 2017 | 6.01% | 0.80% |
| 2016 | 4.11% | 0.93% |
| 2015 | 3.68% | 0.86% |
| 2014 | 3.64% | 0.78% |
| 2013 | 4.33% | 0.86% |
| 2012 | 4.04% | 1.08% |
| 2011 | 4.50% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 3.66% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 5.32% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 9.19% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 4.18% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 3.07% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.96% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 4.00% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 4.89% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 6.85% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.00% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.16% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.95% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks