StockComparison Logo
vs

IRM vs CHT

Comparison between Iron Mountain Inc (IRM, Company) and Chunghwa Telecom (CHT, Company).

IRM is from the Real Estate sector, while CHT is from the Communication Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceIRM has outperformed CHT, delivering a return of +27.3% compared to +6.2%

IRM vs CHT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
IRM
$37B
CHT
$37B
Max Drawdown
IRM
55.71%
Winner
CHT
48.20%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
IRM
0.87
CHT
0.34
5Y Beta
IRM
0.97
Winner
CHT
0.19
Industry
IRM
Reit - Specialty
CHT
Telecom Services
P/E Ratio
IRM
128.40
Winner
CHT
28.01
Forward P/E
IRM
62.50
Winner
CHT
26.53
PEG Ratio
Winner
IRM
0.99
CHT
2.99
Dividend Yield
IRM
2.63%
Winner
CHT
3.59%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
IRM
10.96%
CHT
1.89%
5Y EPS CAGR
IRM
-3.13%
Winner
CHT
1.31%
Debt to Equity
Winner
IRM
-1407.64%
CHT
10.03%
Free Cash Flow Yield
IRM
-1.73%
Winner
CHT
4.25%
P/S Ratio
IRM
5.18
Winner
CHT
0.15
P/B Ratio
IRM
1732.39
Winner
CHT
2.79

IRM vs CHT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
IRM
+1.66%
Winner
CHT
+6.21%
3M
Winner
IRM
+18.25%
CHT
+6.73%
6M
Winner
IRM
+55.47%
CHT
+10.80%
1Y
Winner
IRM
+27.88%
CHT
+3.33%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
IRM
+27.26%
CHT
+6.21%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
IRM
+18.88%
CHT
+6.81%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
IRM
+14.89%
CHT
+10.50%

IRM vs CHT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearIRMCHT
2026+53.97%+10.16%
2025-18.01%+15.49%
2024+57.51%+0.63%
2023+46.96%+9.01%
2022+1.94%-9.52%
2021+93.15%+12.87%
2020+5.56%+8.87%
2019+6.96%+9.33%
2018-7.72%+3.67%
2017+21.19%+15.98%
2016+28.26%+10.57%
2015-26.26%+6.34%
2014+53.68%-0.47%
2013-1.94%+0.10%
2012+15.95%+7.65%
2011+27.60%+38.86%
2010+10.94%+43.01%
2009-8.19%+34.35%
2008-31.13%-14.41%
2007+34.57%+2.08%
2006-1.69%+11.40%
2005+41.63%-6.57%
2004+16.64%+59.36%
2003+18.92%-2.62%
2002+11.94%N/A
2001+32.73%N/A
2000+4.04%N/A
1999+33.80%N/A

IRM vs CHT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for IRM was -55.71%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 1209 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CHT was -44.43%, occurring on Oct 24, 2008. Recovery took 595 trading sessions.

The current IRM drawdown is -3.72%. The current CHT drawdown is -0.24%.

RankIRMCHT
#1-55.71%
Dec 26, 2007 - Oct 11, 2012
-44.43%
Mar 24, 2008 - Aug 2, 2010
#2-39.05%
Oct 28, 2024 - Apr 30, 2026
-25.11%
May 8, 2006 - Feb 20, 2008
#3-37.87%
Nov 24, 2017 - Jan 26, 2021
-23.72%
Feb 23, 2022 - Sep 26, 2024
#4-36.43%
Feb 5, 2015 - May 9, 2016
-19.37%
Aug 3, 2005 - May 2, 2006
#5-36.42%
Nov 9, 2005 - Feb 22, 2006
-18.37%
Jul 20, 2011 - Jul 11, 2013
#6-34.78%
May 15, 2002 - Nov 14, 2002
-16.10%
Aug 11, 2016 - Jan 2, 2018
#7-34.76%
May 10, 2013 - Sep 29, 2014
-12.38%
Apr 19, 2004 - Jul 9, 2004
#8-25.74%
Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 1, 2001
-12.26%
Oct 30, 2003 - Jan 28, 2004
#9-23.16%
Feb 22, 2006 - Aug 9, 2007
-11.57%
Feb 25, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005
#10-22.91%
Oct 27, 2004 - Aug 25, 2005
-11.03%
Aug 19, 2025 - Jun 11, 2026
#11-22.77%
Jul 26, 2016 - Aug 28, 2017
-10.59%
Jul 22, 2013 - Aug 22, 2014
#12-22.62%
Apr 20, 2022 - Feb 2, 2023
-9.47%
Apr 10, 2018 - Oct 4, 2019
#13-19.95%
Dec 28, 2021 - Mar 23, 2022
-9.39%
Sep 26, 2024 - May 2, 2025
#14-16.49%
Mar 6, 2001 - Jun 8, 2001
-8.68%
Mar 18, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004
#15-14.21%
Apr 23, 2003 - Jan 6, 2004
-7.76%
Aug 28, 2014 - Feb 27, 2015

Correlation

Correlation between IRM and CHT is 0.81 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.81
-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

IRM vs CHT dividend yield comparison.

YearIRMCHT
20261.37%0.00%
20253.88%4.00%
20242.60%3.91%
20233.63%3.91%
20224.96%4.35%
20214.73%3.67%
20208.39%3.67%
20197.69%3.91%
20187.32%4.44%
20175.93%3.64%
20166.17%4.32%
20157.07%3.88%
201413.88%4.51%
20133.56%4.68%
201216.49%8.89%
20113.04%5.74%
20101.50%4.97%
20090.00%4.89%
20080.00%6.49%
20070.00%5.78%
20060.00%5.32%
20050.00%6.34%
20040.00%10.10%

Select Stocks to Compare