HYDB vs AOM

Comparison between ISHARES HIGH YIELD SYSTEMATIC BOND ETF (HYDB, ETF) and ISHARES CORE MODERATE ALLOCATION ETF (AOM, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceAOM has outperformed HYDB, delivering a return of +4.8% compared to +4.8%

HYDB vs AOM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	HYDB(ETF)	AOM(ETF)
Net Assets	$1.60B	$1.70B
Expense Ratio	0.35%	0.15%
Max Drawdown	23.21%	21.59%
Sharpe Ratio	1.27	1.79
5Y Beta	0.24	0.39
5Y Dividends CAGR	4.31%	14.67%

Net Assets

HYDB

$1.60B

Winner

AOM

$1.70B

Expense Ratio

HYDB

0.35%

Winner

AOM

0.15%

Max Drawdown

HYDB

23.21%

Winner

AOM

21.59%

Sharpe Ratio

HYDB

1.27

Winner

AOM

1.79

5Y Beta

Winner

HYDB

0.24

AOM

0.39

5Y Dividends CAGR

HYDB

4.31%

Winner

AOM

14.67%

HYDB vs AOM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	HYDB	AOM
1 month	+0.63%	+3.04%
3 months	+0.33%	+2.10%
6 months	+2.89%	+5.81%
1 year	+8.96%	+16.29%
5 years(CAGR)	+4.77%	+4.77%
10 years(CAGR)	+5.54%	+6.32%
Max(CAGR)	+5.54%	+6.75%

HYDB

+0.63%

Winner

AOM

+3.04%

HYDB

+0.33%

Winner

AOM

+2.10%

HYDB

+2.89%

Winner

AOM

+5.81%

HYDB

+8.96%

Winner

AOM

+16.29%

5Y(CAGR)

HYDB

+4.77%

Winner

AOM

+4.77%

10Y(CAGR)

HYDB

+5.54%

Winner

AOM

+6.32%

Max(CAGR)

HYDB

+5.54%

Winner

AOM

+6.75%

HYDB vs AOM - Annual Returns (2008 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	HYDB	AOM
2026	+1.21%	+4.21%
2025	+7.83%	+13.40%
2024	+9.32%	+8.57%
2023	+13.97%	+11.84%
2022	-9.93%	-14.50%
2021	+5.26%	+7.13%
2020	+7.25%	+9.61%
2019	+16.27%	+15.48%
2018	-3.10%	-4.21%
2017	+3.37%	+11.47%
2016	N/A	+6.20%
2015	N/A	-1.18%
2014	N/A	+5.12%
2013	N/A	+8.94%
2012	N/A	+7.99%
2011	N/A	+1.82%
2010	N/A	+7.03%
2009	N/A	+12.74%
2008	N/A	+7.29%

HYDB vs AOM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for HYDB was -21.58%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 161 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for AOM was -19.96%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.

The current HYDB drawdown is -0.13%.

Rank	HYDB	AOM
#1	-21.58% Feb 20, 2020 - Oct 8, 2020	-19.96% Nov 5, 2021 - Jun 18, 2024
#2	-14.28% Dec 28, 2021 - Dec 1, 2023	-16.90% Feb 14, 2020 - Jul 15, 2020
#3	-6.52% Oct 3, 2018 - Feb 5, 2019	-15.69% Jan 5, 2009 - Jul 23, 2009
#4	-5.58% Feb 28, 2025 - Jun 4, 2025	-10.27% Nov 24, 2008 - Dec 8, 2008
#5	-3.37% Jan 26, 2018 - Aug 7, 2018	-8.42% Nov 19, 2008 - Nov 24, 2008
#6	-2.83% Feb 20, 2026 - Apr 14, 2026	-8.06% Jan 26, 2018 - Mar 29, 2019
#7	-2.43% Aug 11, 2017 - Oct 23, 2017	-7.85% Apr 27, 2015 - Jun 8, 2016
#8	-2.21% May 3, 2019 - Jun 18, 2019	-7.34% Jul 22, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012
#9	-1.94% Mar 27, 2024 - May 3, 2024	-6.54% Feb 14, 2025 - May 13, 2025
#10	-1.94% Nov 9, 2021 - Dec 23, 2021	-5.81% Apr 15, 2010 - Sep 20, 2010
#11	-1.77% Dec 6, 2024 - Jan 21, 2025	-5.27% May 21, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013
#12	-1.63% Dec 27, 2023 - Jan 25, 2024	-5.11% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#13	-1.59% Oct 23, 2017 - Dec 29, 2017	-4.29% Jan 14, 2010 - Mar 16, 2010
#14	-1.52% Sep 22, 2025 - Oct 27, 2025	-4.27% Apr 2, 2012 - Aug 6, 2012
#15	-1.45% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 5, 2021	-4.07% Dec 10, 2008 - Dec 30, 2008

Correlation

Correlation between HYDB and AOM is 0.99 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.99

-101

Dividend Comparison (2008 - 2026)

HYDB vs AOM dividend yield comparison.

Year	HYDB	AOM
2026	2.29%	0.63%
2025	7.04%	2.98%
2024	6.95%	3.10%
2023	7.00%	2.79%
2022	6.30%	2.27%
2021	4.70%	1.56%
2020	5.81%	2.02%
2019	5.68%	2.66%
2018	6.16%	2.53%
2017	2.70%	3.31%
2016	0.00%	2.14%
2015	0.00%	1.98%
2014	0.00%	2.08%
2013	0.00%	1.87%
2012	0.00%	2.11%
2011	0.00%	2.33%
2010	0.00%	1.72%
2009	0.00%	2.01%
2008	0.00%	0.58%