HR vs CLF
Comparison between Healthcare Realty Trust Inc (HR, Company) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company).
HR is from the Real Estate sector, while CLF is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceHR has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +1.7% compared to -9.8%
HR vs CLF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
HR vs CLF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
HR vs CLF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | HR | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +24.04% | +0.22% |
| 2025 | +10.01% | +39.20% |
| 2024 | +5.61% | -52.45% |
| 2023 | -5.95% | +21.62% |
| 2022 | -23.46% | -25.86% |
| 2021 | +18.37% | +50.97% |
| 2020 | -2.76% | +88.69% |
| 2019 | +29.96% | +10.16% |
| 2018 | -7.28% | -2.66% |
| 2017 | +10.63% | -16.26% |
| 2016 | +12.91% | +403.59% |
| 2015 | +6.98% | -77.52% |
| 2014 | +35.27% | -71.27% |
| 2013 | -8.19% | -30.80% |
| 2012 | +32.78% | -38.56% |
| 2011 | -8.83% | -23.00% |
| 2010 | +3.93% | +63.25% |
| 2009 | +6.42% | +57.60% |
| 2008 | -0.69% | -46.54% |
| 2007 | -22.23% | +112.27% |
| 2006 | +27.55% | +5.86% |
| 2005 | -10.35% | +76.79% |
| 2004 | +23.20% | +95.85% |
| 2003 | +32.76% | +147.09% |
| 2002 | +13.01% | +7.53% |
| 2001 | +42.74% | -14.70% |
| 2000 | +50.85% | -24.00% |
| 1999 | -17.29% | +8.53% |
HR vs CLF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for HR was -61.46%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 1510 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current HR drawdown is -2.81%. The current CLF drawdown is -86.06%.
| Rank | HR | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -61.46% Feb 20, 2007 - Feb 19, 2013 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 |
| #2 | -47.04% Aug 15, 2022 - Mar 14, 2024 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 |
| #3 | -34.81% Mar 6, 2020 - Oct 20, 2021 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 |
| #4 | -28.79% May 17, 2013 - Jan 6, 2015 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 |
| #5 | -26.00% Jan 27, 2015 - Jan 22, 2016 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 |
| #6 | -24.38% Jun 26, 2017 - Jun 19, 2019 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 |
| #7 | -23.35% Aug 1, 2016 - Jun 13, 2017 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #8 | -23.28% Apr 2, 2004 - Dec 1, 2004 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 |
| #9 | -23.25% Nov 2, 1999 - Apr 27, 2000 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 |
| #10 | -23.03% Oct 28, 2021 - Aug 12, 2022 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 |
| #11 | -20.83% Aug 26, 2002 - Jun 9, 2003 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 |
| #12 | -18.47% Aug 3, 2005 - Sep 20, 2006 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 |
| #13 | -16.70% Sep 28, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 |
| #14 | -14.58% Aug 15, 2019 - Aug 19, 2019 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 |
| #15 | -14.50% Dec 6, 2004 - Jul 12, 2005 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between HR and CLF is -0.14 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
HR vs CLF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | HR | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.34% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 6.49% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 7.32% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 7.20% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 34.01% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 7.89% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 7.26% | 0.82% |
| 2019 | 7.34% | 3.10% |
| 2018 | 4.22% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 3.74% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 3.96% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 4.24% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 4.39% | 8.40% |
| 2013 | 5.63% | 2.29% |
| 2012 | 5.00% | 5.59% |
| 2011 | 6.46% | 1.35% |
| 2010 | 5.67% | 0.65% |
| 2009 | 7.18% | 0.55% |
| 2008 | 6.56% | 1.37% |
| 2007 | 26.94% | 0.50% |
| 2006 | 6.68% | 0.98% |
| 2005 | 7.89% | 0.68% |
| 2004 | 6.27% | 0.19% |
| 2003 | 6.91% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 8.17% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 8.25% | 2.19% |
| 2000 | 10.49% | 6.96% |
| 1999 | 3.49% | 1.21% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks