StockComparison Logo
vs

HOFT vs EML

Comparison between Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT, Company) and Eastern Company (EML, Company).

HOFT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while EML is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceEML has outperformed HOFT, delivering a return of -1.9% compared to -12.1%

HOFT vs EML - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
HOFT
$146M
EML
$146M
Max Drawdown
HOFT
85.39%
Winner
EML
75.58%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
HOFT
0.65
EML
0.27
5Y Beta
HOFT
0.85
Winner
EML
0.69
Industry
HOFT
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
EML
Tools & Accessories
P/E Ratio
Winner
HOFT
-6.41
EML
25.16
Forward P/E
HOFT
17.61
Winner
EML
9.61
PEG Ratio
Winner
HOFT
-0.07
EML
1.15
Dividend Yield
Winner
HOFT
5.08%
EML
1.78%
5Y Dividends CAGR
HOFT
-3.86%
Winner
EML
4.56%
5Y EPS CAGR
HOFT
N/A
EML
-6.41%
Debt to Equity
Winner
HOFT
0.00%
EML
26.41%
Free Cash Flow Yield
HOFT
-13.30%
Winner
EML
7.00%
P/S Ratio
Winner
HOFT
0.52
EML
0.64
P/B Ratio
Winner
HOFT
0.86
EML
1.25

HOFT vs EML - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
HOFT
-19.35%
Winner
EML
+2.06%
3M
HOFT
+9.23%
Winner
EML
+10.57%
6M
HOFT
+6.19%
Winner
EML
+35.72%
1Y
Winner
HOFT
+28.57%
EML
+6.69%
5Y(CAGR)
HOFT
-12.08%
Winner
EML
-1.92%
10Y(CAGR)
HOFT
-1.82%
Winner
EML
+5.46%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
HOFT
+7.97%
EML
+5.71%

HOFT vs EML - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearHOFTEML
2026+25.33%+24.80%
2025-9.98%-24.60%
2024-43.50%+23.96%
2023+46.46%+13.68%
2022-16.36%-23.08%
2021-23.14%+11.14%
2020+29.30%-17.61%
2019-4.07%+21.13%
2018-36.69%-6.94%
2017+16.83%+32.09%
2016+58.11%+12.90%
2015+50.76%+4.20%
2014+7.78%+8.47%
2013+14.58%-0.24%
2012+27.65%-16.95%
2011-17.18%+14.23%
2010+14.43%+36.69%
2009+67.08%+54.80%
2008-59.92%-50.78%
2007+32.53%-4.95%
2006-3.92%+53.51%
2005-22.90%-0.52%
2004+14.04%+32.17%
2003+127.72%+46.15%
2002+106.99%-3.38%
2001+17.58%-6.55%
2000N/A-13.40%
1999N/A+2.34%

HOFT vs EML Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for HOFT was -80.92%, occurring on Apr 16, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for EML was -74.76%, occurring on Dec 29, 2008. Recovery took 2488 trading sessions.

The current HOFT drawdown is -62.83%. The current EML drawdown is -27.03%.

RankHOFTEML
#1-80.92%
Dec 6, 2017 - Apr 16, 2025
-74.76%
Jun 5, 2007 - Apr 21, 2017
#2-78.71%
Oct 6, 2004 - Apr 10, 2015
-51.23%
Jun 3, 2021 - Mar 25, 2024
#3-39.72%
Mar 21, 2016 - Dec 12, 2016
-48.80%
Jan 16, 2020 - May 10, 2021
#4-23.15%
Dec 10, 2003 - Jul 28, 2004
-47.01%
Oct 17, 2024 - Jan 28, 2026
#5-22.49%
May 17, 2002 - Dec 13, 2002
-30.64%
Mar 27, 2024 - Oct 17, 2024
#6-21.94%
Jan 4, 2017 - Apr 6, 2017
-30.18%
Feb 7, 2001 - Jul 16, 2003
#7-20.48%
May 14, 2003 - Sep 12, 2003
-29.44%
May 21, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019
#8-20.22%
Jan 19, 2001 - May 9, 2001
-28.14%
Jan 20, 2000 - Jan 22, 2001
#9-16.74%
May 9, 2017 - Sep 22, 2017
-25.58%
Aug 17, 2005 - Sep 29, 2006
#10-14.04%
May 18, 2015 - Nov 25, 2015
-21.53%
Jun 5, 2017 - May 21, 2018
#11-13.42%
Jul 5, 2001 - Dec 20, 2001
-17.95%
Apr 24, 2007 - May 29, 2007
#12-12.99%
Oct 3, 2017 - Nov 30, 2017
-16.20%
Feb 8, 2007 - Mar 12, 2007
#13-12.62%
Dec 1, 2015 - Jan 6, 2016
-15.03%
Mar 1, 2005 - Jul 1, 2005
#14-10.14%
Jan 7, 2016 - Feb 22, 2016
-12.82%
Oct 2, 2006 - Dec 26, 2006
#15-10.04%
May 9, 2001 - Jul 5, 2001
-12.13%
Mar 12, 2007 - Apr 16, 2007

Correlation

Correlation between HOFT and EML is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.73
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

HOFT vs EML dividend yield comparison.

YearHOFTEML
20261.67%0.91%
20257.13%2.23%
20246.57%1.66%
20233.41%2.00%
20224.39%2.28%
20213.18%1.76%
20202.05%1.83%
20192.37%1.44%
20182.16%1.82%
20171.18%1.68%
20161.11%2.11%
20151.58%2.39%
20142.33%2.81%
20132.40%2.64%
20123.44%2.53%
20113.49%1.80%
20102.83%2.91%
20093.23%2.68%
20085.22%3.84%
20071.99%1.74%
20061.98%1.62%
20051.63%2.25%
20041.06%2.20%
20031.05%2.81%
20022.04%3.99%
20012.92%3.66%
20000.00%3.35%
19990.00%0.70%

Select Stocks to Compare