HL-P-B vs MT
Comparison between Hecla Mining Company (HL-P-B, Company) and ArcelorMittal (MT, Company).
5-Year PerformanceMT has outperformed HL-P-B, delivering a return of +15.7% compared to +8.7%
HL-P-B vs MT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
HL-P-B vs MT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
HL-P-B vs MT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | HL-P-B | MT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -7.86% | +27.45% |
| 2025 | +43.01% | +102.52% |
| 2024 | +4.03% | -16.41% |
| 2023 | +0.10% | +8.57% |
| 2022 | +6.53% | -17.23% |
| 2021 | +1.30% | +34.13% |
| 2020 | +21.07% | +29.31% |
| 2019 | +1.26% | -12.23% |
| 2018 | +8.38% | -39.18% |
| 2017 | +2.16% | +43.41% |
| 2016 | +6.13% | +137.07% |
| 2015 | +13.90% | -60.43% |
| 2014 | +5.03% | -36.59% |
| 2013 | N/A | +2.53% |
| 2012 | N/A | -8.10% |
| 2011 | N/A | -48.80% |
| 2010 | N/A | -19.09% |
| 2009 | N/A | +79.03% |
| 2008 | N/A | -66.82% |
| 2007 | N/A | +93.01% |
| 2006 | N/A | +69.10% |
| 2005 | N/A | -26.22% |
| 2004 | N/A | +329.92% |
| 2003 | N/A | +299.55% |
| 2002 | N/A | +18.92% |
| 2001 | N/A | -36.36% |
| 2000 | N/A | -85.71% |
| 1999 | N/A | +50.80% |
HL-P-B vs MT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for HL-P-B was -91.82%, occurring on Oct 20, 2017. Recovery took 356 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MT was -96.35%, occurring on Feb 11, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current HL-P-B drawdown is -36.78%. The current MT drawdown is -65.17%.
| Rank | HL-P-B | MT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -91.82% Aug 5, 2016 - Jan 4, 2018 | -96.35% Jun 5, 2008 - Feb 11, 2016 |
| #2 | -37.85% Jan 26, 2026 - Jun 9, 2026 | -95.62% Jan 14, 2000 - Aug 2, 2004 |
| #3 | -24.31% Mar 6, 2020 - Apr 13, 2020 | -46.40% Feb 25, 2005 - May 8, 2006 |
| #4 | -21.02% Feb 14, 2022 - Jul 28, 2023 | -28.64% May 8, 2006 - Oct 19, 2006 |
| #5 | -20.13% Jul 28, 2023 - Sep 22, 2025 | -28.56% Oct 29, 2007 - Apr 4, 2008 |
| #6 | -17.29% Jan 4, 2018 - Feb 12, 2019 | -27.60% Dec 1, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 |
| #7 | -16.37% Feb 12, 2019 - Jan 8, 2020 | -22.91% Oct 6, 2004 - Oct 26, 2004 |
| #8 | -13.86% Jul 13, 2015 - Feb 10, 2016 | -20.72% Jul 12, 2007 - Sep 14, 2007 |
| #9 | -12.73% Jul 17, 2020 - Jan 4, 2021 | -12.06% Sep 13, 2004 - Oct 4, 2004 |
| #10 | -11.49% Dec 14, 2021 - Jan 14, 2022 | -10.37% Dec 7, 1999 - Dec 21, 1999 |
| #11 | -11.23% Jan 13, 2021 - Mar 25, 2021 | -9.62% Aug 10, 2004 - Sep 7, 2004 |
| #12 | -10.28% Dec 19, 2025 - Jan 14, 2026 | -8.75% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 26, 2007 |
| #13 | -9.70% Jul 27, 2016 - Aug 5, 2016 | -7.75% Dec 11, 2006 - Jan 23, 2007 |
| #14 | -9.14% May 20, 2015 - Jun 29, 2015 | -6.91% Jun 21, 2007 - Jul 9, 2007 |
| #15 | -8.20% Jun 13, 2016 - Jul 25, 2016 | -6.66% Oct 26, 2006 - Dec 11, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between HL-P-B and MT is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2005 - 2026)
HL-P-B vs MT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | HL-P-B | MT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.75% | 0.50% |
| 2025 | 4.93% | 1.21% |
| 2024 | 6.62% | 2.16% |
| 2023 | 6.43% | 1.55% |
| 2022 | 6.03% | 1.45% |
| 2021 | 6.14% | 0.94% |
| 2020 | 5.97% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 6.73% | 1.14% |
| 2018 | 6.38% | 0.48% |
| 2017 | 6.60% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 6.33% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 6.33% | 4.03% |
| 2014 | 1.69% | 1.54% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.91% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.65% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.51% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.67% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.39% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 6.48% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 5.41% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.32% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks