HIFS vs GOOD
Comparison between Hingham Institution For Savings (HIFS, Company) and Gladstone Commercial Corp (GOOD, Company).
HIFS is from the Financial Services sector, while GOOD is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceHIFS has outperformed GOOD, delivering a return of +0.8% compared to -2.3%
HIFS vs GOOD - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
HIFS vs GOOD - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
HIFS vs GOOD - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | HIFS | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.68% | +23.20% |
| 2025 | +15.26% | -27.71% |
| 2024 | +29.44% | +33.12% |
| 2023 | -29.30% | -22.93% |
| 2022 | -34.21% | -21.83% |
| 2021 | +95.00% | +56.45% |
| 2020 | +7.87% | -7.47% |
| 2019 | +6.33% | +30.45% |
| 2018 | -1.41% | -6.71% |
| 2017 | +4.23% | +11.63% |
| 2016 | +68.39% | +53.74% |
| 2015 | +44.21% | -7.62% |
| 2014 | +13.35% | +4.17% |
| 2013 | +24.72% | +7.43% |
| 2012 | +30.04% | +10.39% |
| 2011 | +13.87% | +0.80% |
| 2010 | +50.54% | +53.14% |
| 2009 | +14.20% | +68.57% |
| 2008 | -12.31% | -46.07% |
| 2007 | -10.68% | -6.25% |
| 2006 | -7.94% | +31.90% |
| 2005 | -8.66% | +1.83% |
| 2004 | +8.03% | +6.14% |
| 2003 | +41.71% | +13.16% |
| 2002 | +29.83% | N/A |
| 2001 | +41.53% | N/A |
| 2000 | +16.80% | N/A |
| 1999 | -0.79% | N/A |
HIFS vs GOOD Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for HIFS was -64.80%, occurring on Oct 31, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for GOOD was -67.15%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 869 trading sessions.
The current HIFS drawdown is -29.83%. The current GOOD drawdown is -27.40%.
| Rank | HIFS | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.80% Jan 4, 2022 - Oct 31, 2023 | -67.15% Oct 27, 2006 - Apr 14, 2010 |
| #2 | -43.69% Dec 4, 2017 - Jan 14, 2021 | -66.25% Nov 1, 2019 - Apr 29, 2021 |
| #3 | -43.10% Apr 25, 2005 - Sep 17, 2010 | -53.23% Dec 31, 2021 - May 16, 2023 |
| #4 | -24.08% Nov 4, 1999 - Aug 10, 2000 | -26.07% Mar 20, 2015 - Apr 25, 2016 |
| #5 | -18.60% Aug 9, 2011 - Mar 29, 2012 | -25.84% Nov 29, 2017 - Feb 20, 2019 |
| #6 | -15.69% Jan 4, 2017 - Nov 21, 2017 | -22.75% May 31, 2011 - Jan 30, 2012 |
| #7 | -15.65% Oct 17, 2012 - Feb 5, 2013 | -15.90% May 17, 2013 - Feb 27, 2015 |
| #8 | -15.62% Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 18, 2013 | -14.43% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 25, 2010 |
| #9 | -15.24% Jul 31, 2001 - Mar 18, 2002 | -13.35% Feb 3, 2012 - Aug 29, 2012 |
| #10 | -13.61% Nov 10, 2015 - May 31, 2016 | -13.21% Sep 23, 2016 - Nov 16, 2016 |
| #11 | -12.39% Jan 15, 2014 - Jun 30, 2014 | -12.59% Apr 18, 2017 - Sep 26, 2017 |
| #12 | -12.24% May 3, 2021 - Sep 15, 2021 | -11.64% Apr 4, 2006 - Aug 23, 2006 |
| #13 | -11.67% Jan 22, 2004 - Feb 1, 2005 | -10.68% Jun 25, 2010 - Oct 5, 2010 |
| #14 | -11.39% Feb 4, 2005 - Apr 25, 2005 | -10.44% Dec 23, 2004 - Aug 31, 2005 |
| #15 | -10.68% Jun 2, 2016 - Sep 14, 2016 | -10.20% Sep 24, 2012 - Jan 10, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between HIFS and GOOD is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
HIFS vs GOOD dividend yield comparison.
| Year | HIFS | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.68% | 3.92% |
| 2025 | 0.89% | 11.25% |
| 2024 | 0.74% | 7.39% |
| 2023 | 1.30% | 9.06% |
| 2022 | 1.10% | 8.13% |
| 2021 | 0.67% | 5.83% |
| 2020 | 1.61% | 8.35% |
| 2019 | 0.73% | 6.86% |
| 2018 | 0.70% | 8.37% |
| 2017 | 0.63% | 7.12% |
| 2016 | 0.62% | 7.46% |
| 2015 | 1.79% | 10.28% |
| 2014 | 1.57% | 8.74% |
| 2013 | 1.68% | 8.35% |
| 2012 | 2.04% | 8.36% |
| 2011 | 2.57% | 8.55% |
| 2010 | 2.58% | 7.97% |
| 2009 | 3.49% | 11.19% |
| 2008 | 4.07% | 17.65% |
| 2007 | 2.70% | 8.21% |
| 2006 | 2.33% | 7.15% |
| 2005 | 2.53% | 5.82% |
| 2004 | 2.10% | 2.81% |
| 2003 | 2.12% | 0.06% |
| 2002 | 2.67% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.49% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 3.82% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks