HCM vs EEFT

Comparison between HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM, Company) and Euronet Worldwide Inc (EEFT, Company).

HCM is from the Healthcare sector, while EEFT is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceEEFT has outperformed HCM, delivering a return of -15.6% compared to -18.5%

HCM vs EEFT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	HCM(COMPANY)	EEFT(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$2.50B	$2.49B
Max Drawdown	82.18%	81.21%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.14	-1.57
5Y Beta	0.78	1.04
Industry	Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic	Software - Infrastructure
P/E Ratio	5.36	8.92
Forward P/E	40.82	6.05
PEG Ratio	0.00	0.47
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	5.04%
Debt to Equity	7.60%	210.90%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-1.99%	12.25%
P/S Ratio	4.42	0.58
P/B Ratio	2.25	2.06

Market Cap

Winner

HCM

$2.50B

EEFT

$2.49B

Max Drawdown

HCM

82.18%

Winner

EEFT

81.21%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

HCM

-1.14

EEFT

-1.57

5Y Beta

Winner

HCM

0.78

EEFT

1.04

Industry

HCM

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

EEFT

Software - Infrastructure

P/E Ratio

Winner

HCM

5.36

EEFT

8.92

Forward P/E

HCM

40.82

Winner

EEFT

6.05

PEG Ratio

Winner

HCM

0.00

EEFT

0.47

5Y EPS CAGR

HCM

N/A

EEFT

5.04%

Debt to Equity

Winner

HCM

7.60%

EEFT

210.90%

Free Cash Flow Yield

HCM

-1.99%

Winner

EEFT

12.25%

P/S Ratio

HCM

4.42

Winner

EEFT

0.58

P/B Ratio

HCM

2.25

Winner

EEFT

2.06

HCM vs EEFT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	HCM	EEFT
1 month	-13.50%	-4.74%
3 months	-22.76%	-8.00%
6 months	-18.33%	-15.09%
1 year	-38.15%	-40.55%
5 years(CAGR)	-18.53%	-15.63%
10 years(CAGR)	-2.00%	-1.53%
Max(CAGR)	-1.94%	+12.27%

HCM

-13.50%

Winner

EEFT

-4.74%

HCM

-22.76%

Winner

EEFT

-8.00%

HCM

-18.33%

Winner

EEFT

-15.09%

Winner

HCM

-38.15%

EEFT

-40.55%

5Y(CAGR)

HCM

-18.53%

Winner

EEFT

-15.63%

10Y(CAGR)

HCM

-2.00%

Winner

EEFT

-1.53%

Max(CAGR)

HCM

-1.94%

Winner

EEFT

+12.27%

HCM vs EEFT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	HCM	EEFT
2026	-19.71%	-10.04%
2025	-11.60%	-24.71%
2024	-17.70%	+2.24%
2023	+10.56%	+5.56%
2022	-58.54%	-22.35%
2021	+3.06%	-15.27%
2020	+21.15%	-8.65%
2019	+9.96%	+55.14%
2018	-43.87%	+20.22%
2017	+163.68%	+15.34%
2016	+1.27%	+3.50%
2015	N/A	+33.86%
2014	N/A	+15.46%
2013	N/A	+100.04%
2012	N/A	+22.92%
2011	N/A	+5.60%
2010	N/A	-22.66%
2009	N/A	+81.86%
2008	N/A	-60.36%
2007	N/A	-0.27%
2006	N/A	+4.87%
2005	N/A	+9.88%
2004	N/A	+40.12%
2003	N/A	+132.49%
2002	N/A	-57.21%
2001	N/A	+302.22%
2000	N/A	-34.71%
1999	N/A	+146.91%

HCM vs EEFT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for HCM was -82.18%, occurring on Oct 25, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for EEFT was -81.21%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1896 trading sessions.

The current HCM drawdown is -74.48%. The current EEFT drawdown is -60.84%.

Rank	HCM	EEFT
#1	-82.18% Aug 9, 2021 - Oct 25, 2022	-81.21% Mar 20, 2006 - Sep 30, 2013
#2	-63.07% Jan 2, 2018 - Jul 21, 2021	-79.22% Jan 28, 2002 - May 19, 2004
#3	-20.59% Jun 15, 2016 - Dec 2, 2016	-62.39% Jul 10, 2019 - Jun 10, 2026
#4	-14.78% Jan 3, 2017 - Mar 13, 2017	-62.37% Mar 31, 2000 - Jul 23, 2001
#5	-14.57% Nov 16, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017	-39.29% Aug 23, 2001 - Oct 16, 2001
#6	-14.55% Aug 8, 2017 - Oct 2, 2017	-34.02% Jun 25, 2004 - Nov 30, 2004
#7	-13.03% Jul 22, 2021 - Jul 30, 2021	-29.41% Nov 6, 2015 - Oct 3, 2016
#8	-12.01% Oct 11, 2017 - Oct 27, 2017	-28.75% Oct 23, 2017 - Sep 12, 2018
#9	-11.04% Mar 30, 2017 - May 17, 2017	-26.67% Dec 18, 2013 - Jul 1, 2014
#10	-10.72% May 6, 2016 - Jun 8, 2016	-25.83% Feb 15, 2000 - Mar 27, 2000
#11	-9.17% Dec 6, 2016 - Jan 3, 2017	-22.99% Dec 3, 2014 - Apr 22, 2015
#12	-8.91% Mar 15, 2017 - Mar 30, 2017	-20.67% Dec 31, 1999 - Feb 14, 2000
#13	-7.54% Apr 20, 2016 - May 6, 2016	-20.58% Sep 16, 2005 - Jan 30, 2006
#14	-7.09% Oct 27, 2017 - Nov 15, 2017	-19.98% Dec 3, 2018 - Feb 8, 2019
#15	-6.74% Jul 5, 2017 - Aug 3, 2017	-18.82% Dec 1, 1999 - Dec 6, 1999