GTLS vs HBM

Comparison between Chart Industries Inc (GTLS, Company) and Hudbay Minerals Inc (HBM, Company).

GTLS is from the Industrials sector, while HBM is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceHBM has outperformed GTLS, delivering a return of +30.3% compared to +6.9%

GTLS vs HBM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GTLS(COMPANY)	HBM(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$9.88B	$9.84B
Max Drawdown	90.06%	92.73%
Sharpe Ratio	1.53	1.97
5Y Beta	1.52	1.74
Industry	Specialty Industrial Machinery	Copper
P/E Ratio	-320.83	14.91
Forward P/E	14.33	15.22
PEG Ratio	0.62	0.05
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.09%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	5.89%
Debt to Equity	119.94%	30.14%
Free Cash Flow Yield	0.10%	2.57%
P/S Ratio	2.39	4.28
P/B Ratio	3.14	2.88

Market Cap

Winner

GTLS

$9.88B

HBM

$9.84B

Max Drawdown

Winner

GTLS

90.06%

HBM

92.73%

Sharpe Ratio

GTLS

1.53

Winner

HBM

1.97

5Y Beta

Winner

GTLS

1.52

HBM

1.74

Industry

GTLS

Specialty Industrial Machinery

HBM

Copper

P/E Ratio

Winner

GTLS

-320.83

HBM

14.91

Forward P/E

Winner

GTLS

14.33

HBM

15.22

PEG Ratio

GTLS

0.62

Winner

HBM

0.05

Dividend Yield

GTLS

N/A

HBM

0.09%

5Y Dividends CAGR

GTLS

N/A

HBM

5.89%

Debt to Equity

GTLS

119.94%

Winner

HBM

30.14%

Free Cash Flow Yield

GTLS

0.10%

Winner

HBM

2.57%

P/S Ratio

Winner

GTLS

2.39

HBM

4.28

P/B Ratio

GTLS

3.14

Winner

HBM

2.88

GTLS vs HBM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GTLS	HBM
1 month	-0.67%	+4.42%
3 months	-0.37%	+18.29%
6 months	+0.38%	+43.05%
1 year	+40.99%	+182.33%
5 years(CAGR)	+6.90%	+30.28%
10 years(CAGR)	+22.85%	+18.84%
Max(CAGR)	+14.02%	+11.89%

GTLS

-0.67%

Winner

HBM

+4.42%

GTLS

-0.37%

Winner

HBM

+18.29%

GTLS

+0.38%

Winner

HBM

+43.05%

GTLS

+40.99%

Winner

HBM

+182.33%

5Y(CAGR)

GTLS

+6.90%

Winner

HBM

+30.28%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

GTLS

+22.85%

HBM

+18.84%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

GTLS

+14.02%

HBM

+11.89%

GTLS vs HBM - Annual Returns (2006 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GTLS	HBM
2026	+0.08%	+32.51%
2025	+8.61%	+133.63%
2024	+41.13%	+48.66%
2023	+18.62%	+8.81%
2022	-25.08%	-28.48%
2021	+34.69%	-1.52%
2020	+71.21%	+70.87%
2019	+2.34%	-13.25%
2018	+34.39%	-48.53%
2017	+26.89%	+47.04%
2016	+103.27%	+46.50%
2015	-47.59%	-56.93%
2014	-63.36%	+6.88%
2013	+40.21%	-22.57%
2012	+19.24%	-0.96%
2011	+48.34%	-44.04%
2010	+98.36%	+37.87%
2009	+49.91%	+211.30%
2008	-65.63%	N/A
2007	+91.81%	N/A
2006	+6.64%	N/A

GTLS vs HBM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GTLS was -90.06%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 670 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HBM was -92.21%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 3731 trading sessions.

The current GTLS drawdown is -13.81%. The current HBM drawdown is -16.45%.

Rank	GTLS	HBM
#1	-90.06% Jul 31, 2008 - Mar 29, 2011	-92.21% Dec 10, 2010 - Oct 13, 2025
#2	-89.05% Oct 2, 2013 - Jan 6, 2021	-40.97% Nov 9, 2009 - Oct 15, 2010
#3	-57.01% Nov 8, 2022 - Mar 17, 2023	-36.16% Feb 27, 2026 - May 29, 2026
#4	-46.00% Sep 23, 2021 - Aug 8, 2022	-31.59% Jun 11, 2009 - Aug 5, 2009
#5	-39.10% Jul 19, 2011 - Nov 15, 2011	-22.54% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
#6	-35.96% Nov 6, 2007 - Mar 4, 2008	-20.13% Oct 14, 2009 - Nov 5, 2009
#7	-31.12% Aug 3, 2006 - Jan 23, 2007	-19.50% May 4, 2009 - Jun 11, 2009
#8	-26.96% Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 1, 2013	-17.02% Oct 13, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025
#9	-22.49% Mar 31, 2011 - Jul 1, 2011	-13.22% Jan 28, 2026 - Feb 24, 2026
#10	-21.91% Mar 15, 2021 - Aug 5, 2021	-12.80% Feb 26, 2009 - Mar 24, 2009
#11	-19.49% Jul 13, 2007 - Sep 18, 2007	-11.92% Mar 27, 2009 - Apr 2, 2009
#12	-16.10% Aug 10, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022	-9.02% Apr 13, 2009 - Apr 24, 2009
#13	-15.84% Jan 22, 2021 - Feb 8, 2021	-7.91% Feb 18, 2009 - Feb 24, 2009
#14	-13.98% Dec 9, 2011 - Feb 23, 2012	-7.32% Aug 13, 2009 - Sep 9, 2009
#15	-13.92% Nov 15, 2011 - Dec 9, 2011	-6.98% Sep 30, 2009 - Oct 6, 2009