GT vs HCM

Comparison between Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT, Company) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM, Company).

GT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while HCM is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceGT has outperformed HCM, delivering a return of -17.5% compared to -22.3%

GT vs HCM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GT(COMPANY)	HCM(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.85B	$1.85B
Max Drawdown	91.07%	82.18%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.87	-0.72
5Y Beta	1.08	0.80
Industry	Auto Parts	Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
P/E Ratio	-0.89	4.05
Forward P/E	7.86	12.33
PEG Ratio	0.43	0.00
5Y Dividends CAGR	28.31%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	22.20%	N/A
Debt to Equity	264.78%	7.53%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-6.80%	-4.26%
P/S Ratio	0.11	3.37
P/B Ratio	0.63	1.50

Market Cap

Winner

$1.85B

HCM

$1.85B

Max Drawdown

91.07%

Winner

HCM

82.18%

Sharpe Ratio

-0.87

Winner

HCM

-0.72

5Y Beta

1.08

Winner

HCM

0.80

Industry

Auto Parts

HCM

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

P/E Ratio

Winner

-0.89

HCM

4.05

Forward P/E

Winner

7.86

HCM

12.33

PEG Ratio

0.43

Winner

HCM

0.00

5Y Dividends CAGR

28.31%

HCM

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

22.20%

HCM

N/A

Debt to Equity

264.78%

Winner

HCM

7.53%

Free Cash Flow Yield

-6.80%

Winner

HCM

-4.26%

P/S Ratio

Winner

0.11

HCM

3.37

P/B Ratio

Winner

0.63

HCM

1.50

GT vs HCM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GT	HCM
1 month	+11.69%	-0.69%
3 months	-0.90%	-25.81%
6 months	-26.12%	-16.19%
1 year	-40.52%	-27.09%
5 years(CAGR)	-17.54%	-22.28%
10 years(CAGR)	-11.98%	-1.38%
Max(CAGR)	-5.57%	-1.52%

Winner

+11.69%

HCM

-0.69%

Winner

-0.90%

HCM

-25.81%

-26.12%

Winner

HCM

-16.19%

-40.52%

Winner

HCM

-27.09%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

-17.54%

HCM

-22.28%

10Y(CAGR)

-11.98%

Winner

HCM

-1.38%

Max(CAGR)

-5.57%

Winner

HCM

-1.52%

GT vs HCM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GT	HCM
2026	-26.12%	-16.19%
2025	+0.11%	-11.60%
2024	-36.66%	-17.70%
2023	+40.53%	+10.56%
2022	-53.40%	-58.54%
2021	+109.64%	+3.06%
2020	-28.20%	+21.15%
2019	-21.85%	+9.96%
2018	-35.39%	-43.87%
2017	+5.01%	+163.68%
2016	-2.51%	+1.27%
2015	+16.29%	N/A
2014	+22.53%	N/A
2013	+70.63%	N/A
2012	-5.22%	N/A
2011	+15.77%	N/A
2010	-19.88%	N/A
2009	+116.59%	N/A
2008	-77.74%	N/A
2007	+23.77%	N/A
2006	+17.53%	N/A
2005	+16.64%	N/A
2004	+86.51%	N/A
2003	+11.97%	N/A
2002	-70.52%	N/A
2001	+9.25%	N/A
2000	-10.77%	N/A
1999	-28.04%	N/A

GT vs HCM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GT was -90.42%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 2418 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HCM was -82.18%, occurring on Oct 25, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current GT drawdown is -80.59%. The current HCM drawdown is -73.36%.

Rank	GT	HCM
#1	-90.42% Jul 9, 2007 - Feb 13, 2017	-82.18% Aug 9, 2021 - Oct 25, 2022
#2	-89.60% Nov 16, 1999 - Apr 27, 2007	-63.07% Jan 2, 2018 - Jul 21, 2021
#3	-86.54% Mar 15, 2017 - Mar 18, 2020	-20.59% Jun 15, 2016 - Dec 2, 2016
#4	-7.80% Jun 5, 2007 - Jul 5, 2007	-14.78% Jan 3, 2017 - Mar 13, 2017
#5	-6.66% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999	-14.57% Nov 16, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017
#6	-5.35% Apr 27, 2007 - May 17, 2007	-14.55% Aug 8, 2017 - Oct 2, 2017
#7	-3.42% Feb 21, 2017 - Mar 14, 2017	-13.03% Jul 22, 2021 - Jul 30, 2021
#8	-2.37% May 18, 2007 - May 29, 2007	-12.01% Oct 11, 2017 - Oct 27, 2017
#9	-0.28% May 29, 2007 - May 31, 2007	-11.04% Mar 30, 2017 - May 17, 2017
#10	-0.28% Feb 15, 2017 - Feb 21, 2017	-10.72% May 6, 2016 - Jun 8, 2016
#11	N/A	-9.17% Dec 6, 2016 - Jan 3, 2017
#12	N/A	-8.91% Mar 15, 2017 - Mar 30, 2017
#13	N/A	-7.54% Apr 20, 2016 - May 6, 2016
#14	N/A	-7.09% Oct 27, 2017 - Nov 15, 2017
#15	N/A	-6.74% Jul 5, 2017 - Aug 3, 2017