GT vs ECPG

Comparison between Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT, Company) and Encore Capital Group Inc (ECPG, Company).

GT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while ECPG is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceECPG has outperformed GT, delivering a return of +13.7% compared to -14.4%

GT vs ECPG - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GT(COMPANY)	ECPG(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.93B	$1.93B
Max Drawdown	91.07%	95.07%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.65	2.49
5Y Beta	1.10	1.25
Industry	Auto Parts	Credit Services
P/E Ratio	-0.92	6.73
Forward P/E	7.86	5.54
PEG Ratio	0.43	0.17
5Y Dividends CAGR	28.31%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	22.20%	5.64%
Debt to Equity	264.78%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-6.51%	8.60%
P/S Ratio	0.11	1.04
P/B Ratio	0.64	1.88

Market Cap

Winner

$1.93B

ECPG

$1.93B

Max Drawdown

Winner

91.07%

ECPG

95.07%

Sharpe Ratio

-0.65

Winner

ECPG

2.49

5Y Beta

Winner

1.10

ECPG

1.25

Industry

Auto Parts

ECPG

Credit Services

P/E Ratio

Winner

-0.92

ECPG

6.73

Forward P/E

7.86

Winner

ECPG

5.54

PEG Ratio

0.43

Winner

ECPG

0.17

5Y Dividends CAGR

28.31%

ECPG

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

22.20%

ECPG

5.64%

Debt to Equity

264.78%

Winner

ECPG

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

-6.51%

Winner

ECPG

8.60%

P/S Ratio

Winner

0.11

ECPG

1.04

P/B Ratio

Winner

0.64

ECPG

1.88

GT vs ECPG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GT	ECPG
1 month	+22.03%	+6.25%
3 months	+1.89%	+9.11%
6 months	-22.25%	+59.03%
1 year	-33.83%	+130.37%
5 years(CAGR)	-14.42%	+13.66%
10 years(CAGR)	-11.49%	+13.81%
Max(CAGR)	-5.21%	+12.96%

Winner

+22.03%

ECPG

+6.25%

+1.89%

Winner

ECPG

+9.11%

-22.25%

Winner

ECPG

+59.03%

-33.83%

Winner

ECPG

+130.37%

5Y(CAGR)

-14.42%

Winner

ECPG

+13.66%

10Y(CAGR)

-11.49%

Winner

ECPG

+13.81%

Max(CAGR)

-5.21%

Winner

ECPG

+12.96%

GT vs ECPG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GT	ECPG
2026	-18.33%	+59.54%
2025	+0.11%	+15.64%
2024	-36.66%	-7.37%
2023	+40.53%	+2.88%
2022	-53.40%	-21.93%
2021	+109.64%	+66.83%
2020	-28.20%	+8.38%
2019	-21.85%	+44.09%
2018	-35.39%	-44.05%
2017	+5.01%	+43.93%
2016	-2.51%	-1.61%
2015	+16.29%	-33.70%
2014	+22.53%	-10.36%
2013	+70.63%	+63.66%
2012	-5.22%	+37.12%
2011	+15.77%	-10.67%
2010	-19.88%	+33.16%
2009	+116.59%	+151.08%
2008	-77.74%	-18.64%
2007	+23.77%	-21.11%
2006	+17.53%	-26.49%
2005	+16.64%	-25.50%
2004	+86.51%	+60.68%
2003	+11.97%	+1158.33%
2002	-70.52%	+323.08%
2001	+9.25%	-23.53%
2000	-10.77%	-90.41%
1999	-28.04%	+12.79%

GT vs ECPG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GT was -90.42%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 2418 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ECPG was -95.07%, occurring on Dec 14, 2000. Recovery took 871 trading sessions.

The current GT drawdown is -78.54%. The current ECPG drawdown is -4.89%.

Rank	GT	ECPG
#1	-90.42% Jul 9, 2007 - Feb 13, 2017	-95.07% Nov 5, 1999 - Apr 29, 2003
#2	-89.60% Nov 16, 1999 - Apr 27, 2007	-88.48% Nov 30, 2004 - Feb 15, 2011
#3	-86.54% Mar 15, 2017 - Mar 18, 2020	-67.51% Feb 14, 2014 - Oct 13, 2021
#4	-7.80% Jun 5, 2007 - Jul 5, 2007	-62.54% Jul 29, 2022 - Mar 4, 2026
#5	-6.66% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999	-41.61% May 31, 2011 - May 17, 2013
#6	-5.35% Apr 27, 2007 - May 17, 2007	-32.81% Jul 25, 2003 - Dec 12, 2003
#7	-3.42% Feb 21, 2017 - Mar 14, 2017	-24.27% Jan 30, 2004 - Sep 7, 2004
#8	-2.37% May 18, 2007 - May 29, 2007	-22.40% Feb 18, 2022 - Jul 29, 2022
#9	-0.28% May 29, 2007 - May 31, 2007	-17.00% Jun 17, 2003 - Jul 15, 2003
#10	-0.28% Feb 15, 2017 - Feb 21, 2017	-15.31% Apr 30, 2003 - May 9, 2003
#11	N/A	-13.94% Jun 13, 2013 - Jul 31, 2013
#12	N/A	-13.85% Feb 25, 2011 - Apr 26, 2011
#13	N/A	-11.23% Oct 30, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014
#14	N/A	-9.88% Mar 4, 2026 - Apr 7, 2026
#15	N/A	-7.93% Nov 8, 2021 - Dec 22, 2021