GT vs CCU
Comparison between Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT, Company) and Compania Cervecerias Unidas S.A. (CCU, Company).
GT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while CCU is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceCCU has outperformed GT, delivering a return of -6.5% compared to -14.7%
GT vs CCU - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GT vs CCU - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GT vs CCU - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GT | CCU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -21.19% | -8.49% |
| 2025 | +0.11% | +15.00% |
| 2024 | -36.66% | -8.93% |
| 2023 | +40.53% | +0.40% |
| 2022 | -53.40% | -16.24% |
| 2021 | +109.64% | +23.99% |
| 2020 | -28.20% | -21.30% |
| 2019 | -21.85% | -20.93% |
| 2018 | -35.39% | -13.96% |
| 2017 | +5.01% | +45.54% |
| 2016 | -2.51% | -0.87% |
| 2015 | +16.29% | +18.96% |
| 2014 | +22.53% | -20.54% |
| 2013 | +70.63% | -23.18% |
| 2012 | -5.22% | +26.58% |
| 2011 | +15.77% | +6.35% |
| 2010 | -19.88% | +58.07% |
| 2009 | +116.59% | +40.58% |
| 2008 | -77.74% | -21.01% |
| 2007 | +23.77% | -0.74% |
| 2006 | +17.53% | +13.61% |
| 2005 | +16.64% | -0.93% |
| 2004 | +86.51% | -26.55% |
| 2003 | +11.97% | +28.62% |
| 2002 | -70.52% | -25.64% |
| 2001 | +9.25% | +8.30% |
| 2000 | -10.77% | N/A |
| 1999 | -28.04% | N/A |
GT vs CCU Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GT was -90.42%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 2418 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CCU was -65.69%, occurring on Aug 5, 2002. Recovery took 2365 trading sessions.
The current GT drawdown is -79.29%. The current CCU drawdown is -47.97%.
| Rank | GT | CCU |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -90.42% Jul 9, 2007 - Feb 13, 2017 | -65.69% Feb 1, 2001 - Jul 26, 2010 |
| #2 | -89.60% Nov 16, 1999 - Apr 27, 2007 | -63.08% May 2, 2013 - Oct 30, 2020 |
| #3 | -86.54% Mar 15, 2017 - Mar 18, 2020 | -24.36% Apr 2, 2012 - Jan 18, 2013 |
| #4 | -7.80% Jun 5, 2007 - Jul 5, 2007 | -21.16% May 10, 2011 - Dec 21, 2011 |
| #5 | -6.66% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999 | -15.76% Nov 22, 2010 - Apr 20, 2011 |
| #6 | -5.35% Apr 27, 2007 - May 17, 2007 | -11.08% Jan 4, 2001 - Jan 11, 2001 |
| #7 | -3.42% Feb 21, 2017 - Mar 14, 2017 | -9.50% Sep 13, 2010 - Nov 9, 2010 |
| #8 | -2.37% May 18, 2007 - May 29, 2007 | -7.70% Mar 22, 2013 - Apr 29, 2013 |
| #9 | -0.28% May 29, 2007 - May 31, 2007 | -7.22% Jan 17, 2001 - Jan 31, 2001 |
| #10 | -0.28% Feb 15, 2017 - Feb 21, 2017 | -6.08% Feb 28, 2012 - Mar 27, 2012 |
| #11 | N/A | -4.58% Apr 21, 2011 - May 10, 2011 |
| #12 | N/A | -4.40% Nov 9, 2010 - Nov 19, 2010 |
| #13 | N/A | -4.30% Aug 9, 2010 - Aug 26, 2010 |
| #14 | N/A | -4.30% Jan 30, 2013 - Feb 28, 2013 |
| #15 | N/A | -2.94% Mar 5, 2013 - Mar 12, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between GT and CCU is 0.35 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
GT vs CCU dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GT | CCU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.45% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 3.10% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 3.65% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 2.09% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 5.93% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 12.08% |
| 2020 | 1.47% | 4.05% |
| 2019 | 4.11% | 6.62% |
| 2018 | 2.84% | 3.05% |
| 2017 | 1.36% | 1.47% |
| 2016 | 1.00% | 1.42% |
| 2015 | 0.77% | 1.41% |
| 2014 | 0.77% | 1.91% |
| 2013 | 0.21% | 1.30% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 0.84% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.56% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 2.08% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.47% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 5.17% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.17% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.58% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.65% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.61% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 5.73% |
| 2002 | 7.05% | 1.14% |
| 2001 | 4.28% | 1.42% |
| 2000 | 5.22% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.07% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks