GSM vs CRD-A
Comparison between Ferroglobe Plc (GSM, Company) and Crawford & Co. - Class A (CRD-A, Company).
GSM is from the Basic Materials sector, while CRD-A is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceCRD-A has outperformed GSM, delivering a return of +3.6% compared to -11.3%
GSM vs CRD-A - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GSM vs CRD-A - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GSM vs CRD-A - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GSM | CRD-A |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -29.51% | +1.86% |
| 2025 | +19.65% | +1.73% |
| 2024 | -40.94% | -7.92% |
| 2023 | +77.87% | +147.47% |
| 2022 | -40.03% | -25.48% |
| 2021 | +293.04% | +8.09% |
| 2020 | +72.63% | -32.56% |
| 2019 | -43.37% | +34.22% |
| 2018 | -90.18% | +7.57% |
| 2017 | +75.14% | -6.49% |
| 2016 | -0.34% | +97.00% |
| 2015 | -36.58% | -38.28% |
| 2014 | -2.66% | +15.94% |
| 2013 | +26.97% | +36.90% |
| 2012 | -1.77% | +49.04% |
| 2011 | -21.54% | +70.23% |
| 2010 | +78.81% | -24.53% |
| 2009 | +32.58% | -56.34% |
| 2008 | N/A | +86.70% |
| 2007 | N/A | -42.62% |
| 2006 | N/A | +4.59% |
| 2005 | N/A | -10.39% |
| 2004 | N/A | +3.60% |
| 2003 | N/A | +76.03% |
| 2002 | N/A | -49.92% |
| 2001 | N/A | -9.05% |
| 2000 | N/A | -3.54% |
| 1999 | N/A | +0.09% |
GSM vs CRD-A Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GSM was -98.30%, occurring on Mar 16, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CRD-A was -82.82%, occurring on Sep 27, 2010. Recovery took 1997 trading sessions.
The current GSM drawdown is -84.74%. The current CRD-A drawdown is -12.90%.
| Rank | GSM | CRD-A |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.30% Jul 13, 2011 - Mar 16, 2020 | -82.82% Aug 11, 2008 - Jul 18, 2016 |
| #2 | -23.08% Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 17, 2010 | -70.16% Mar 18, 2002 - Aug 11, 2008 |
| #3 | -16.94% Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 7, 2011 | -52.67% Dec 16, 2019 - Jun 16, 2023 |
| #4 | -15.74% Sep 30, 2009 - Nov 12, 2009 | -40.76% Feb 26, 2024 - Mar 11, 2024 |
| #5 | -13.43% Jan 20, 2010 - Mar 8, 2010 | -32.87% Nov 21, 2016 - Feb 1, 2019 |
| #6 | -12.73% Mar 4, 2011 - Apr 5, 2011 | -30.76% Jun 29, 2001 - Mar 18, 2002 |
| #7 | -12.42% Aug 5, 2009 - Sep 30, 2009 | -20.81% Mar 5, 2019 - Jun 27, 2019 |
| #8 | -10.07% Nov 12, 2009 - Dec 8, 2009 | -19.53% Jun 30, 2023 - Nov 20, 2023 |
| #9 | -8.70% Feb 17, 2011 - Feb 28, 2011 | -17.94% Jan 11, 2000 - Jun 20, 2001 |
| #10 | -8.58% Jan 18, 2011 - Feb 8, 2011 | -12.24% Jul 18, 2016 - Nov 11, 2016 |
| #11 | -6.84% Nov 8, 2010 - Dec 3, 2010 | -11.15% Dec 29, 2023 - Feb 15, 2024 |
| #12 | -5.97% Dec 10, 2010 - Jan 7, 2011 | -9.95% Jul 15, 2019 - Sep 12, 2019 |
| #13 | -5.74% Oct 18, 2010 - Nov 2, 2010 | -8.21% Feb 19, 2019 - Mar 1, 2019 |
| #14 | -4.24% Apr 26, 2010 - Apr 29, 2010 | -5.83% Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999 |
| #15 | -4.21% Dec 9, 2009 - Dec 23, 2009 | -5.70% Sep 30, 2019 - Nov 13, 2019 |
Correlation
Correlation between GSM and CRD-A is -0.55 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
GSM vs CRD-A dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GSM | CRD-A |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.93% | 1.37% |
| 2025 | 1.21% | 2.58% |
| 2024 | 1.37% | 2.42% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 1.97% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 4.32% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 3.20% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 2.57% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.44% |
| 2018 | 7.55% | 3.15% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 3.29% |
| 2016 | 2.95% | 2.96% |
| 2015 | 2.98% | 5.52% |
| 2014 | 1.74% | 2.80% |
| 2013 | 1.46% | 2.34% |
| 2012 | 1.82% | 2.84% |
| 2011 | 1.49% | 2.46% |
| 2010 | 0.88% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 3.01% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 4.14% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.43% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 3.39% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 9.76% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 6.41% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 5.42% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.14% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks