GS vs TM
Comparison between Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS, Company) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM, Company).
GS is from the Financial Services sector, while TM is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceGS has outperformed TM, delivering a return of +23.3% compared to +6.7%
GS vs TM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GS vs TM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GS vs TM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GS | TM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +2.97% | -13.93% |
| 2025 | +55.97% | +14.71% |
| 2024 | +51.03% | +10.10% |
| 2023 | +14.96% | +36.47% |
| 2022 | -10.84% | -24.81% |
| 2021 | +46.87% | +24.20% |
| 2020 | +15.28% | +12.26% |
| 2019 | +36.40% | +22.49% |
| 2018 | -33.76% | -6.75% |
| 2017 | +6.79% | +10.83% |
| 2016 | +37.26% | -0.23% |
| 2015 | -6.07% | +3.20% |
| 2014 | +11.02% | +7.00% |
| 2013 | +36.40% | +29.82% |
| 2012 | +35.95% | +40.05% |
| 2011 | -47.13% | -15.35% |
| 2010 | -1.92% | -6.33% |
| 2009 | +97.00% | +28.90% |
| 2008 | -58.99% | -36.78% |
| 2007 | +7.85% | -20.02% |
| 2006 | +56.00% | +28.83% |
| 2005 | +22.81% | +30.52% |
| 2004 | +8.25% | +20.14% |
| 2003 | +43.04% | +29.25% |
| 2002 | -24.73% | +4.74% |
| 2001 | -7.04% | -18.72% |
| 2000 | +21.66% | -34.77% |
| 1999 | +35.76% | +42.68% |
GS vs TM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GS was -78.84%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2288 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TM was -60.16%, occurring on Apr 14, 2003. Recovery took 1423 trading sessions.
The current GS drawdown is -3.52%. The current TM drawdown is -24.47%.
| Rank | GS | TM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.84% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 1, 2016 | -60.16% Apr 25, 2000 - Dec 21, 2005 |
| #2 | -54.58% Sep 11, 2000 - Nov 1, 2005 | -56.11% Jan 4, 2007 - May 13, 2013 |
| #3 | -48.75% Mar 12, 2018 - Dec 28, 2020 | -36.79% Jan 13, 2022 - Jan 19, 2024 |
| #4 | -42.37% Mar 24, 2000 - Aug 28, 2000 | -34.92% Mar 27, 2024 - Feb 4, 2026 |
| #5 | -32.82% Nov 2, 2021 - Mar 20, 2024 | -27.92% Mar 30, 2015 - Jan 3, 2018 |
| #6 | -30.91% Feb 18, 2025 - Jun 25, 2025 | -25.20% Nov 11, 2019 - Nov 11, 2020 |
| #7 | -29.29% Jun 13, 2007 - Oct 9, 2007 | -24.47% Feb 13, 2026 - May 8, 2026 |
| #8 | -19.43% Jan 15, 2026 - Mar 13, 2026 | -22.65% May 5, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 |
| #9 | -17.48% Apr 20, 2006 - Sep 22, 2006 | -20.90% Aug 2, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 |
| #10 | -16.17% Mar 3, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 | -18.07% May 10, 2018 - Sep 13, 2019 |
| #11 | -15.39% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000 | -17.21% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 27, 2000 |
| #12 | -14.00% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 23, 2007 | -11.75% May 21, 2013 - Jul 17, 2013 |
| #13 | -11.92% Jan 14, 2021 - Feb 16, 2021 | -11.53% Jan 17, 2018 - May 10, 2018 |
| #14 | -10.89% Jun 4, 2021 - Aug 6, 2021 | -11.45% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021 |
| #15 | -10.42% Aug 27, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -9.96% Sep 29, 2021 - Nov 16, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between GS and TM is 0.88 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
GS vs TM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GS | TM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.48% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 1.59% | 2.95% |
| 2024 | 2.01% | 2.81% |
| 2023 | 2.72% | 2.45% |
| 2022 | 2.62% | 2.90% |
| 2021 | 1.70% | 2.45% |
| 2020 | 1.90% | 2.74% |
| 2019 | 1.80% | 1.30% |
| 2018 | 1.89% | 3.40% |
| 2017 | 1.14% | 2.96% |
| 2016 | 1.09% | 3.23% |
| 2015 | 1.41% | 5.59% |
| 2014 | 1.16% | 2.57% |
| 2013 | 1.16% | 2.08% |
| 2012 | 1.39% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 1.55% | 1.90% |
| 2010 | 0.83% | 1.31% |
| 2009 | 0.90% | 1.41% |
| 2008 | 1.66% | 4.19% |
| 2007 | 0.65% | 2.19% |
| 2006 | 0.65% | 1.99% |
| 2005 | 0.78% | 1.17% |
| 2004 | 0.96% | 1.07% |
| 2003 | 0.75% | 0.91% |
| 2002 | 0.74% | 1.21% |
| 2001 | 0.52% | 0.72% |
| 2000 | 0.45% | 0.93% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks